[kictanet] KIXP connectivity

[robert yawe]

Hi,

You have a very negative nature, why "ka wagoire na ngoi" (google wont help you 
here)

We contribute to find solutions to our local problems there is a place and time 
for being the devils advocate.  
Loadmwesh, thanks for the confidence that I can provide direction in providing 
more reliable peering for local traffic and I will work towards this McTim or 
not.

In addition can Fiona tell us if the recently launched Mombasa exchange 
point straddle the 3 marine cables?  On the licensing issue I believe Dr. Ndemo 
has told us many times that he is willing to be of assistance is we can proof 
that legislation is hindering progress.  Please forward me the CCK directive 
that required us to have a content provider license so as to peer at KIXP.

On that issue does it mean that anyone who has a website is requires to get a 
Content Provider licence?  That would actually be laughable, I always believed 
that this license was required for short code resellers?

I still insist that the local bandwidth needs to be higher than that of the 
incoming pipes as the terrestrial cable needs to carry the foreign traffic and 
local traffic as well.

Regards
 Robert Yawe
KAY System Technologies Ltd
Phoenix House, 6th Floor
P O Box 55806 Nairobi, 00200
Kenya


Tel: +254722511225, +254202010696




________________________________
From: McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com>
To: robertyawe at yahoo.co.uk
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Thu, 30 September, 2010 23:10:05
Subject: Re: [kictanet] KIXP connectivity

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:01 PM, lordmwesh <lordmwesh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Robert, hold your praises on TESPOK.
>
> Even after praising Fiona, and all the Tespok crew, i dont think they
> are very genuine, or keen to embrace single players into the IXP. We
> have had so many forums, especially  IGFs, and other Kictanet
> moderated forums, and at no single point have we seen the 'grave
> isssues' raised by FIONA appear in the public domain.

At every forum I have attended, the KIXP folk have made it a point to
bring up the licensing issue.

>
> Is somebody playing PR?
>
> What would be the modalities of establishing a parallel IXP for
> private content providers, who can then peer with KIXP

You can't peer with KIXP, you peer with others at KIXP.

IIUC, if you get a Content Providers license, then you can join the
peering mesh.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: robertyawe at yahoo.co.uk
Unsubscribe or change your options at 
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/robertyawe%40yahoo.co.uk



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20101001/124b9881/attachment.htm>