[kictanet] Privacy vs National Interest-Draft Data Protection Bill?

Wed Jul 28 20:21:31 EAT 2010

Those who were at Monetary studies can bear me witness that we indeed
harmonized the FOI and its policy framework along with Data Protection and
agreed to move them forward.  The problem has been the delay.  Further we
always have time after the first reading to make some contributions.

Regards

Ndemo.

> As per the foregoing, it seems the law (though unsure which one) in
> Kenya, is developed on top-bottom approach, that the Draft Bill in
> discussion here, was not shared with stakeholders.
>
> Once it gets at the Cabinet, it's practically impossible to discuss it
> with the concerned.
> Maybe the new constitutional dispensation, if it sees light from on
> Wednesday next week, will change the whole process.
>
> There are two people onlist who I firmly believe can be of much help
> here: Dr. Ndemo and Eng. Rege. Both have access to any policy
> documents easily.
> As Mwololo has pointed out, it would be prudent to share the bill out
> so that we read from the same script.
>
> On 28/07/2010, Mwololo Tim <timwololo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Dr. Ndemo,
>> The re-developed policy was never shared with stakeholders, at least as
>> far
>> as I can remember. Could you kindly share it. tm
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:23 AM, <bitange at jambo.co.ke> wrote:
>>
>>> Hon. Rege,
>>> Indeed the AG cleared the Bill only to find out that the policy that
>>> developed it was not sufficient.  We quickly developed the policy and
>>> sent
>>> it to Cabinet.  It is waiting to go through the Cabinet Sub Committee
>>> Chaired by the PM before getting to Full Cabinet.
>>>
>>> I know you can push it through from where it is at the moment.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> Ndemo.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > Dear Colleagues,
>>> > I have been a way from civilization, campaigning for the "Yes" katiba
>>> > for
>>> > sometime now. In fact I am not supposed to be in  Nairobi City today
>>> but
>>> > came back for the IGF.
>>> > Engineer John Kariuki, please correct me if I am wrong in my
>>> understanding
>>> > that it would be prudent to have FOI Act before the Data Protection
>>> one?
>>> > Two weeks ago I ran into the AG in Parliament.  I asked him if the
>>> FOI
>>> has
>>> > been cleared and ready for presentation on the floor of the House.
>>> His
>>> > answer was that the document is with the Ministry.  Dr Ndemo, please
>>> > advise.
>>> >
>>> > Kind regards
>>> > Hon. James Rege, MP, Karachuonyo
>>> >
>>> > Sent from my iPad
>>> >
>>> > On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Walubengo J <jwalu at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > @ Ndemo,
>>> >
>>> > I hear you. We must also find a way to educate our Cabinet that the
>>> phrase
>>> >  "1 day in Politics is a long time" does apply more in ICTs than in
>>> > politics...If they endorse an ICT bill discussed four years ago, the
>>> ICT
>>> > terrain would have changed significantly to warrant a review of the
>>> > earlier discussions...
>>> >
>>> > walu.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --- On Sat, 7/24/10, bitange at jambo.co.ke <bitange at jambo.co.ke> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > From: bitange at jambo.co.ke <bitange at jambo.co.ke>
>>> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Privacy vs National Interest-Draft
>>> > DataProtectionBill?
>>> > To: "Walubengo J" <jwalu at yahoo.com>
>>> > Cc: bitange at jambo.co.ke, "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions"
>>> > <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
>>> > Date: Saturday, July 24, 2010, 4:03 PM
>>> >
>>> > Walibengo,
>>> > I am equallly frustrated because it takes at least four years to go
>>> > through Cabinet, AG's office and Parliament.  These are processes
>>> beyond
>>> > my control.
>>> >
>>> > Iy you recall, we merged the two FOIs, the Prof. Nyongo one and our
>>> own
>>> > draft.  We indeed agreed that I send to Cabinet.  I have promised
>>> > practically anyone I meet that the bill will soon be out of Cabinet
>>> > soon.
>>> > I am confident that it will happen one day since FOI for example is
>>> an
>>> > agenda 4 item.
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Ndemo.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> Bwana PS,
>>> >>
>>> >> true that these drafts were debated and i recall attending the forum
>>> at
>>> >> KSPS. Problem is this was a while back (2006-7) but the problem has
>>> >> always
>>> >> been that you never get to know what part of non-government
>>> >> stakeholders
>>> >> contributions were taken on board (went to the cabinet) and which
>>> parts
>>> >> were ignored.
>>> >>
>>> >> Eventually ofcourse one will get to know the details when the Bill
>>> gets
>>> >> to
>>> >> the floor of Parliament. And then the real challenge starts in that
>>> if
>>> >> other stakeholders think that what is before parliament is not
>>> >> "inclusive"
>>> >> enough, they will try to influence MPs to change it accordingly.  At
>>> >> that
>>> >> level ONLY the big "influential" stakeholders (read: donors/private
>>> >> sector) can get the attention of the MPs; let alone their "buy-in"
>>> to
>>> >> make
>>> >> changes (read: forget our famous wanjiku's input at this level)
>>> >>
>>> >> Finally, even if the big stakeholders do get their changes in, if at
>>> >> all
>>> >> the Executive feels that those changes significantly alter their
>>> >> original
>>> >> policy objectives, they can always play the red card (veto) and take
>>> >> the
>>> >> whole process back to square1.
>>> >>
>>> >> So in short, my submission is that it is always cheaper to build and
>>> >> probably more importantly confirm consensus at the beginning of the
>>> >> policy
>>> >> process rather than towards the end.
>>> >>
>>> >> walu.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --- On Sat, 7/24/10, bitange at jambo.co.ke <bitange at jambo.co.ke>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> From: bitange at jambo.co.ke <bitange at jambo.co.ke>
>>> >> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Privacy vs National Interest-Draft
>>> >> DataProtectionBill?
>>> >> To: jwalu at yahoo.com
>>> >> Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions"
>>> <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
>>> >> Date: Saturday, July 24, 2010, 9:17 AM
>>> >>
>>> >> We debated the FOI and Data Protection at School of Monetary
>>> studies.
>>> >> We
>>> >> shall as public have another go at it when it is published and gone
>>> >> through the first reading in Parliament.
>>> >>
>>> >> Ndemo.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Sent from my BlackBerryÂ®
>>> >>
>>> >> -----Original Message-----
>>> >> From: David Otwoma <otwomad at gmail.com>
>>> >> Sender: kictanet-bounces+bitange=jambo.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> >> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:52:40
>>> >> To: <bitange at jambo.co.ke>
>>> >> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
>>> >> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Privacy vs National Interest-Draft Data
>>> >>     ProtectionBill?
>>> >>
>>> >> Dear Edith,
>>> >>
>>> >> Cabinet Memoranda are classified documents intended for tabling in
>>> >> Cabinet Meetings. These documents are regulated by strict rules
>>> issued
>>> >> by the Presidency ...when they are approved then the Bill goes to
>>> >> Parliament and is again in the public domain for your input as per
>>> >> Parliamentary procedures.
>>> >>
>>> >> Enjoy your Furahi day all.
>>> >>
>>> >> Kind regards
>>> >>
>>> >> David
>>> >>
>>> >> On 7/22/10, Edith Adera <eadera at idrc.or.ke> wrote:
>>> >>> Dr Ndemo,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Can it not be circulated to stakeholders for review? Wasn't a
>>> >>> participatory
>>> >>> process followed to draft it?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Edith
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>>> >>> From: kictanet-bounces+eadera=idrc.or.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> >>> [mailto:kictanet-bounces+eadera
>>> <kictanet-bounces%2Beadera>=idrc.or.ke
>>> @lists.kictanet.or.ke] On
>>> >>> Behalf
>>> >>> Of bitange at jambo.co.ke
>>> >>> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 11:03 AM
>>> >>> To: Edith Adera
>>> >>> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Privacy vs National Interest-Draft Data
>>> >>> ProtectionBill?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The draft bill is in Cabinet.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Ndemo.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Sent from my BlackBerry(r)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>>> >>> From: Walubengo J <jwalu at yahoo.com>
>>> >>> Sender: kictanet-bounces+bitange=jambo.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> >>> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:57:59
>>> >>> To: <bitange at jambo.co.ke>
>>> >>> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Privacy vs National Interest-Draft Data
>>> >>> Protection
>>> >>>     Bill?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> kictanet mailing list
>>> >>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> >>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This message was sent to: bitange at jambo.co.ke Unsubscribe or change
>>> >>> your
>>> >>> options at
>>> >>>
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/bitange%40jambo.co.ke
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> kictanet mailing list
>>> >>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> >>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This message was sent to: eadera at idrc.or.ke Unsubscribe or change
>>> your
>>> >>> options at
>>> >>>
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/eadera%40idrc.or.ke
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> kictanet mailing list
>>> >>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> >>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This message was sent to: otwomad at gmail.com
>>> >>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> >>>
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otwomad%40gmail.com
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> kictanet mailing list
>>> >> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> >> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>> >>
>>> >> This message was sent to: bitange at jambo.co.ke
>>> >> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> >>
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/bitange%40jambo.co.ke
>>> >>
>>> >> ----------------------------------------------
>>> >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> >> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
>>> >> believed to be clean.
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------
>>> >> "easy access to the world"
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> kictanet mailing list
>>> >> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> >> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>> >>
>>> >> This message was sent to: jwalu at yahoo.com
>>> >> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> >> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ----------------------------------------------
>>> >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> >> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
>>> >> believed to be clean.
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------
>>> >> "easy access to the world"
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ----------------------------------------------
>>> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> > dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
>>> > believed to be clean.
>>> > ---------------------------------------------
>>> > "easy access to the world"
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > kictanet mailing list
>>> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>> >
>>> > This message was sent to: jamesrege at rocketmail.com
>>> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> >
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jamesrege%40rocketmail.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ----------------------------------------------
>>> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> > dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
>>> > believed to be clean.
>>> > ---------------------------------------------
>>> > "easy access to the world"
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > kictanet mailing list
>>> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>> >
>>> > This message was sent to: bitange at jambo.co.ke
>>> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> >
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/bitange%40jambo.co.ke
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>>> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
>>> believed to be clean.
>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>> "easy access to the world"
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> kictanet mailing list
>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>
>>> This message was sent to: timwololo at gmail.com
>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/timwololo%40gmail.com
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> Solomon MbÅ©rÅ© Kamau
>
> *****************************************************
> Man is a gregarious animal and enjoys agreement as cows will graze all
> the same way to the side of a hill!
>
> AND
>
> It is better to die in dignity than in the ignomity of ambiguous
> generosity!
>
> http://smiley2.wordpress.com
> http://mburu.sikika.co.ke
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> This message was sent to: bitange at jambo.co.ke
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/bitange%40jambo.co.ke
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> ---------------------------------------------
> "easy access to the world"
>
>

---------------------------------------------- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------
"easy access to the world" 