[kictanet] Day 3 of 10- BPO Discussions, Institutional Frameworks
muriuki mureithi
mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke
Thu Jun 4 16:24:15 EAT 2009
Gilda thanks
I agree with you this is the way to go
Cheers
MM
-----Original Message-----
From: godera at skyweb.co.ke [mailto:godera at skyweb.co.ke]
Sent: 04 June 2009 16:13
To: mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke
Cc: 'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions'
Subject: RE: [kictanet] Day 3 of 10- BPO Discussions, Institutional
Frameworks
I hear you Muriuki. I was stating in a questioning format that according to
Government, they have a body handling BPO.
This institutional framework needs to be re-looked at so we have one
coordinating body as you say Muriuki.
A body- not a steering committee.
Gilda
Quoting muriuki mureithi <mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke>:
> Hi Gilda
> The study we are discussing points out that there are problems even with
the
> existence of KICTB ---
>
> quoting Walu' 'The biggest challenge in Kenya was that there seemed to
be
> no overall, cordinating body overseeing these functions - leading to
alot
> of duplicated and un-cordinated effort from the various Players.'
>
> This is what I was what I was addressing
>
> Cheers
> muriuki mureithi
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: godera at skyweb.co.ke [mailto:godera at skyweb.co.ke]
> Sent: 04 June 2009 14:48
> To: mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke
> Cc: 'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions'
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Day 3 of 10- BPO Discussions, Institutional
> Frameworks
>
>
>
> Muriuki,
>
> I thought the institutional body you are referring to already exists in
the
> name
> of Kenya ICT Board?
>
> Gilda
> Quoting muriuki mureithi <mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke>:
>
> > Hi walu
> >
> > I think the more the organs - govt/ private sector participating in the
> bpo
> > sector the merrier. Each of the organisations comes in with resources
> and
> > goodwill to the help the sector based on its specialised mandate and
> > mission. The tragedy is if the organisations are pulling apart or
> > uncoordinated and thus lack of synergy. The resources and goodwill is
> lost.
> >
> > Two approaches borrowing heavily from the strategies to mainstreams icts
> in
> > 1990s have been tried for such industry initiatives. In the first
> approach,
> > a coordinating organ based on policy and regulatory mandate is
> established
> > and positioned to operate at a level higher that the participating
> > ministries/departments. In our situation such a body would be
> > interministerial operating under the auspices of the President, Prime
> > Minister or Vice President (I am not expert on protocol and this is not
> > intended) . At this level such an institution is able to easily draw and
> > coordinate the resources that are necessary to take the BPO sector to
> the
> > next the level. If you recall in 1990s those countries who wanted to
> > mainstream ICT for fast development largely used this model. This model
> > avoids BPO being seen as ministry of Infocom project and therefore any
> > contribution to its success is an infocom success and their input
'wasted'
> >
> > Another approach is a legal mandate and through it establishes a purpose
> > built independent body. Appointments at the board and any of its other
> > organs will be selected to ensure all stakeholders are integrated in its
> > decision making. Such a body would need to be positioned in the ministry
> > that provides most resources or backward/forward linkages. In the Kenyan
> > scenario, we need to address the big question - is bpo a telecom issue
or
> a
> > trade issue. In South Africa it is trade issue, globally, it is an
> activity
> > of International Trade Centre of UNCTAD/WTO. ITU provides technical
skills
> > if necessary.
> >
> > Act we must act now to tap the goodwill and resources
> >
> > Cheers
> > MM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> kictanet-bounces+mureithi=summitstrategies.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> >
>
[mailto:kictanet-bounces+mureithi=summitstrategies.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.k
> > e] On Behalf Of Walubengo J
> > Sent: 04 June 2009 08:14
> > To: mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke
> > Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
> > Subject: [kictanet] Day 3 of 10- BPO Discussions, Institutional
Frameworks
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Listers,
> >
> > I am encouraged by the flood of ideas that kicked in after Bill and Dr.
> > Ndemo's interventions. Ofcourse Kenduiywo, Bakuli and Peres your
> discourse
> > is as insightful as that of MM and Barrack. Lets keep the ideas flowing
> on
> > previous themes even as we move onto today's theme - just ensure you
pick
> > against the corresponding subject line and post.
> >
> > I wish to open today's theme on Institutional Frameworks. The
Researchers
> > found that in S.Africa, Mauritius, and India, the Private Sector BPO
lobby
> > groups, Data Security Groups and Government Agencies were working
> > harmoniously with clear, non-overlapping mandates to support the BPO
> sector.
> > In Kenya it was found that several bodies were involved in the BPO
Sector.
> > These were largely Government agencies such as the Min of Education
> > (Technology Parks), Kenya ICT Board, KenInvest, Export Promotion
Council,
> > CCK amongst others. The biggest challenge in Kenya was that there seemed
> to
> > be no overall, cordinating body overseeing these functions - leading to
> alot
> > of duplicated and un-cordinated effort from the various Players. And so
> our
> > next Qtn is:
> >
> > Qtn 5: What needs to be done to improve/strengthen the institutional
> > framework in order for the BPO and outsourcing sector to play its
planned
> > role in the Kenyan economy?
> >
> > We have today on this since tmrw we shall move into the Government
> > Subsidiy/Incentive Issues for the BPO Sector.
> >
> > walu.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kictanet mailing list
> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> >
> > This message was sent to: mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke
> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
> >
>
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mureithi%40summitstrate
> > gies.co.ke
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kictanet mailing list
> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> > http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> >
> > This message was sent to: godera at skyweb.co.ke
> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
> >
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/godera%40skyweb.co.ke
> >
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list