[kictanet] Day 5 of 10-KCA 2008, IT Section - the Bad + Recommendations

[Gakuru Alex]

Realizing no law is carved in stone-all are changeable including the
Constitution,
Irrespective of varied stakeholders interests lobbying, advocacy, or
discussions,
Recalling Deputy Speaker's eloquently stated "ipso facto" principle,
Cognizant of new law requirements, aware ignorance is inexcusable,
In observing universally accepted, democratic 'Rule of Law' principle.

Implementation capacity building includes ICT expertise-legal convergence,
Exploring digitally efficient, well-ICT-equipped judicial system infrastructure,
Best practices advice and technical capacity to industry for compliance,
Consumers advisory on various issues therein,
ICT-Legal resource to professionals and the public,

The Centre for Law in ICT Administration-Claw-IT (est.2003) invites,
Like-minded legal practitioners, technologists and academicians,
Stakeholders with demonstrable process value-add propositions,
To collaboration for mutual benefit and clearer legal implications.

If interested contact me off-list gakuru at gmail.com. Spread the word.

Thank you

Alex Gakuru

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Barrack Otieno
<otieno.barrack at gmail.com> wrote:
> If i may contribute to this exchange i think the discussion is important
> Bill. The Law is already in place , however everyone seems to be having
> their own opinion on the Pro's and Cons of the New law which is
> counterproductive in the long run for the sector.Dont forget there are
> vested interests and sideshows in this whole Law issue, as practitioners it
> is important that we are all informed on the benefits (or good tidings) that
> the new new law brings and the challenges it might bring to the sector in
> the long run.In short as others are submitting their petitions let the
> debate continue, we were challenged at the Hilton Forum to embrace Research
> and the kind of information being exchanged on this forum is of utmost
> importance to all members.
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:55 PM, John Walubengo <jwalu at yahoo.com> wrote: