[kictanet] Media Bill
alice
alice at apc.org
Mon May 21 22:26:31 EAT 2007
Dear all
In my opinion, the justification for our media bill would be the policy
vacuum in the media sector and an outdated existing legislative
framework characterised by often times conflicting laws with regards to
the access and dissemination of information.
Therefore the presence of an implementable legislative framework allows
for the establishment of, for example, professional bodies, which
would monitor professional and ethical conduct and practices, while
protecting consumers. The media sector, I am sure does agree that the
absence of self and or co-regulatory measures in the sector would and
has resulted in many governments, ours included, to consider applying
sometimes unfavorable/draconian regulatory measures (we have seen this
played out in in various aspects/instances) in order to protect Kenyans
rights to dignity, privacy, etc
I would agree and join Brian in urging the media and all stakeholders
including consumer networks to, quoting Brian, " take hold of the
olive leaf extended by this government - and the goodwill that is
present at the Ministry - and ensure that we have a good if not a great
Media Act"
best
alice
Note: The above comment are entirely personal and do not reflect any
position of the organisations I am affiliated with.
Brian Longwe wrote:
> To all,
>
> I would like to take a little bit of your "airtime" and lay down a
> slightly different perspective with regards to the Media Bill that is
> under discussion. (Although my comments relate to any Bill that is
> put before Parliament.)
>
> First and foremost my personal position is that I welcome the move to
> put a law in place that governs the 4th estate. On a recent radio
> input I emphasized that any sector law has two sides to it:
> 1) It defines and protects a particular constituent group e.g.
> Communications Industry (Communications Act '98), Childrens Bill etc...
> 2) It protects society and the Kenyan populace in general from harm
> caused by the parties covered under the Act/Bill
>
> Therefore taking these two elements into consideration I would
> encourage that the media fraternity (and all other stakeholders) take
> this opportunity to engage with the process and ensure that we put in
> place a good if not excellent law/Act.
>
> I will give a short story to illustrate my point:
>
> In 1997, the Kenya Communications Bill was published - it aimed to
> regulate, govern and facilitate the growth and development of the
> communications sector. For those of you who recall, the first draft
> was a nightmare and if that is what eventually became the law - we
> would still be living in the dark ages of blind control.
>
> There was a lot of activity surrounding this bill. I remember a
> number of public forum discussions that sought to provide government
> with opportunity to shed light on some of the less clearer parts of
> the bill (i.e. most of it) but also to hear from the public and
> stakeholders what their views and opinions were. The Institute of
> Economic Affairs played a key role in a number of these fora.
>
> Eventually it became abundantly clear that there was a lot of talk
> but very little action. So a group of non-profits, Insitute of
> Economic Affairs, Econews, FemNet and East African Internet
> Association got together and went clause by clause through the draft
> and came up with a very comprehensive set of submissions that
> addressed what we felt were the key/crucial parts of the Bill.
>
> As many of you know, in the commonwealth law system any bill of
> parliament must go through a series of readings. This allows both
> fellow parliamentarians as well as the public to provide input along
> the process. Public input into the process is normally handled by a
> select committee of parliamentarians who are responsible for
> capturing and channeling the inputs into the process and where
> necessary making amendements/changes to the draft.
>
> In our case, we made an appointment to see the House committe - at
> the time chaired by Hon. Shem Ochuodho - and the Chair of the EAIA at
> the. Mr. Suchindranath Aiyer then presented the paper to the House
> Committee. At the end of the presentation our group was
> unceremoniously thrown out (paper, submissions and all). I guess that
> was the governance style of the day (read - KANU).
>
> Nevertheless we didn't give up and decided to use all means possible
> to "squeeze" in our submissions. There were breakfast, lunches and
> cocktails held for parliamentarians - none of which seemed to yield
> much. Eventually it was too late - the Bill had gone for 2nd reading
> - and passed without any changes - now only the Minister and
> President could make any changes. But we didn't give up.....
>
> At the end of the day we were able to find a way of getting the draft
> to the then Minister - Hon. Ntimama. He read through our comments,
> understood all of them and passed them to the Attorney General to
> incorporate. The Kenya Communications Act '98 - which has governed
> our communications sector for the past 9 years consists of almost
> every single point that we had in our draft. As an individual I will
> always have respect and admiration for Ntimama - he was truly
> concerned and focused on this role.
>
> I have told this long story to make one strong point. As a country we
> need good laws to ensure that not only our present - but our future
> and that of our children can be brighter than our present. I would
> strongly encourage the media and all other stakeholders to take hold
> of the olive leaf extended by this government - and the goodwill that
> is present at the Ministry - and ensure that we have a good if not a
> great Media Act.
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> On May 21, 2007, at 10:14 AM, bitange at jambo.co.ke wrote:
>
>
>> Dear All,
>> I feel compelled to respond to Kanja's surprising response to the
>> Media
>> Bill. Media especially MOA has decided to distort information with
>> blatant
>> disregard of a journalist's cardinal rule (objectivity) to poison the
>> People of Kenya with lies and propaganda;
>>
>> Here are the Facts
>> .
>> •The Bill was drafted by stakeholders among then Kanja himself;
>> •The content especially on the code of conduct for journalist were
>> transposed from the current code of conduct with the Media Council;
>> • All stakeholders were kept informed throughout the stages of the
>> Bill
>> and Kanja as the former Chair of MOA received letters informing him
>> of the
>> progress;
>> • The Bill does not seek to control, it simply gives some teeth to the
>> Media council to regulate professional journalists;
>> • Regulation is not control (think, we all are free to drive but we
>> must
>> drive on the left hand side);
>> • Without regulation you have quacks as journalists who may plunge the
>> country into chaos (just listen to Venacular FM stations to
>> understand why
>> we need professionalism in Journalism and remember what happened
>> with Hope
>> FM);
>> • The controversy in the Bill arises from funding. MOA and KUJ did
>> not
>> want to fund the Advisory Board and the Media Council instead they
>> asked
>> the Government to finance; and
>> • Government funding comes with certain strings as you all
>> understand and
>> even if you were to fund you will expect the recipient to adhere to
>> certain rules (we have gone through this with the World Bank even
>> though
>> we did not like it).
>>
>>
>> Bitange Ndemo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by Jambo MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>> ---------------------------------------------
>> "easy access to the world"
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at kictanet.or.ke
>> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>
>> Please unsubscribe or change your options at http://kictanet.or.ke/
>> mailman/options/kictanet/brian%40isisweb.nl
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at kictanet.or.ke
> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Please unsubscribe or change your options at http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alice%40apc.org
>
>
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list