[Kictanet] Day 6 of 10: Best Business & Regulatory Model forprovisioning OFC(EASsy, TEAMs, etc)

[Bill Kagai]

I agree with both [Ndemo and Kai] Esq.. albeit in part.

Open Access can be re-defined at a new (higher) level if both Govt (TEAMS)
and Private (FLAG) float shares to the public in these ventures before the
projects commence. We (Mwananchi) thus becomes consumers in ownership
earning dividend...and everybody goes home happy.

Maybe our primary recommendation should be that a venture which entails
public consumables like this cable should first be floated to the public so
that we ALL gain.

Bill
On 1/29/07, bitange at jambo.co.ke <bitange at jambo.co.ke> wrote:

> Dear All,
> It is appropriate to thank Walubengo for the excellent job he is doing in
> moderating this discussion.  I am suprised that some of you are making
> outrageous statements like "TEAMs is to go to a monopoly".  This is not
> true because I am sure that the TEAMs design has not been made public.
> Secondly, it in the Government interest that these projects benefit
> mwananchi.
>
> The Government would continue to encourage competition to ensure the costs
> are at the lowest.  The only reason one would feel hurt about competitor
> progress is when that person wants the monopoly status.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Ndemo
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20070129/3e35e1f8/attachment.htm>