[kictanet] Safaricom changes to home fibre ToS

[Mwendwa Kivuva]

Thanks Sidney for initiating this debate.

On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 19:44, Sidney Ochieng via kictanet <
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:

> Listers,
> Not sure if you've seen the stir online of changes to the ToS with
> Safaricom's home offering.
> Safaricom is destroying Home Fibre with new ‘Fair Usage’ Limits:
> https://tech-ish.com/2021/02/14/safaricom-is-destroying-home-fibre-with-new-fair-usage-limits/
>
> The response from the company has been disappointing in the extreme,
> misleading with statistics and suggesting that it's best customers are
> thieves <https://twitter.com/Safaricom_Care/status/1360876964651929600>,
> never mind that working for home has lead to increased demand and use of
> their services.
>

That tweet certainly does not call resellers thieves. It calls them
resellers.


>
> All this is beside the point, at least for this forum, what I'm concerned
> about this that if we didn't have an eagle-eyed blogger looking out for
> this, it would have been completely missed until it was already in place.
>
> So I have a few of questions:
>
>    1. Does the CA have any policies around ToS changes around services
>    under their purview and how they are communicated to users?
>
> CA has a consumer and public affairs department. Here is what they have to
say about ToC ( CA/CPA/CEP/B/05/2014 )
https://ca.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Consumer-Rights-and-Responsibilities.pdf


Perhaps CA should update that information. It is 6 years old. But good
information nevertheless.

>
>    1. Should companies that run what could be considered critical
>    infrastructure be allowed to arbitrarily change their ToS to apply
>    retroactively especially if it's to the detriment of their customers?
>
> I hope lawyers here can help us with this.

>
>    1.
>    2. If customers choose not to accept a change in ToS what redress do
>    they have given that perhaps the provider is the only one available in
>    their area.
>    3. Finally, given that we know this could all be avoided if there was
>    more competition in the fibre market, what is the CA doing to make it so
>    that we have more competition in that area? It's concerning that Safaricom
>    seems to only option for home connections in several places
>
>  Determined by the market and economic forces. Just the other day,
Safaricom was not in the home fibre market. What they have provided are
more options for consumers. Numbers are stubborn facts. Fixed data
subscription is as follows: Data source CA, July -September 2020 period,
page 19
https://ca.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Sector-Statistics-Report-Q1-2020-2021.pdf
 Safaricom PLC 229,406 subscribers, 35.6% market share
Wananchi Group (Kenya) Ltd* 202,237 subscribers , 31.4 35.6% market share
 Jamii Telecommunications Ltd 127,914  subscribers , 19.8 Poa  % market
share
 Internet Kenya Ltd 56,824  subscribers ,8.8% market share
 Mawingu Networks Ltd 11,087 subscribers, 1.7 % market share
 Internet Solutions Kenya Ltd 9,228  subscribers, 1.4 % market share

Consumers are speaking with their wallets.

As a policy discussion list, probably what we should be asking is what is
the fair cost for certain broadband packages, and whether there is anything
that can be really unlimited. Wearing my competent network engineer hat, I
can tell you even at Safaricom, they don't have unlimited bandwidth.
Bandwidth is a limited resource to the extent of the network devices,
network media, and cost of acquiring and delivering that bandwidth to your
edge device.

Best Regards
______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mwendwa-kivuva
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20210216/3edc19c7/attachment.htm>