[kictanet] Call for input into Election Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2017 and Election Offences (Amendment) Bill 2017
S.M. Muraya
murigi.muraya at gmail.com
Wed Oct 4 22:03:31 EAT 2017
Kanini,
Check paragraph 257 on page 107 of the Supreme Court majority ruling..
"Was he in the same vein also admitting that not *all* Forms 34A had been
electronically transmitted to the National Tallying Centre from the polling
centres as required by law?"
Paragraph 258: "not scanning all Forms 34A and simultaneously transmitting
them to the NTC"
Paragraph 260 (b) Whether all the Forms 34A had been electronically
transmitted from the polling stations to the National
Tallying Centre.
Paragraphs 262-266 - further emphasizing of electronic transmission, no
sane person is bound to ignore.
Not sure how the Supreme Court complied with Article 159(2)(d) of the
Constitution, but it seems like FOUR Supreme Court judges chose to focus on
the procedural technicalities.. the scanning + electronic transmission of
*ALL* form 34a's to the National Tallying Centre, before the announcement
of results.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:45 PM, kanini mutemi <kaninimutemi at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I get the gist but yes I think there's an error in reporting. The correct
> position in my view:
> 1. Electronic transmission is the bedrock
> 2. Guidelines on use of the electronic system extend to setting up a
> complementary system
> 3. IEBC should set up a complementary system for transmission.
>
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 20:38 S.M. Muraya <murigi.muraya at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Kanini,
>>
>> Do you see any problem (conflict) with the statements below? (could be
>> journalistic error)
>>
>> http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2017/09/iebc-directed-
>> deploy-alternative-oct-17-case-technology-fails/
>>
>> Sep 20 – The Supreme Court has directed the Independent Electoral and
>> Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to put in place a complementary system for the
>> fresh October 17 presidential poll, in compliance with Section 44A of the
>> Elections Act.
>>
>> Chief Justice David Maraga said the court could not simply overlook the
>> negation of guidelines on the use of technology in the transmission of
>> results saying the electronic transmission was the bedrock upon which the
>> new election laws passed by the bi-cameral Parliament were anchored.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 8:12 PM, kanini mutemi via kictanet <
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>
>>> The current Section 44A of the Elections Act allows IEBC to set up a
>>> *complementary* system for transmission of results. I believe that
>>> should take care of those instances. What the Bill proposes is to have two
>>> parallel systems where the manual is superior.
>>>
>>> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 20:01 S.M. Muraya via kictanet <
>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If electronic transmission of results is the only prescribed option in
>>>> the current act, then an amendment is now inevitable ):
>>>>
>>>> Technology firms have indicated, it may not be possible to
>>>> electronically transmit all results from all polling stations.
>>>>
>>>> Forms 34b, transmitted from the Constituency tallying center are
>>>> already described as too bulky..
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nation.co.ke/news/politics/Wafula-Chebukati-
>>>> outlines-tough-demands-on-OT-Morpho-/1064-4119384-10rr6uaz/index.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Further, on plans by the commission to display all the forms 34B from
>>>> constituencies, the firm says it is technologically impossible to do this
>>>> given the bulky nature of the forms.DATA CAPACITYMr Chebukati insists that
>>>> the tech firm should enhance its data capacity to accommodate the bulk
>>>> data.“Please not that since OT-Morpho are the ones who receive the forms
>>>> 34A first, they must make them public. Text results without forms, shall
>>>> not be allowed in whatever circumstances,” he tersely says.He instructs
>>>> them to avoid a situation that happened in August where some 10,000 polling
>>>> stations sent results without forms.*
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Barrack Otieno via kictanet <
>>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Listers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Proposed election amendments make electronic results irrelevant
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> Specifically, proposed amendments kill the need to have electronic
>>>>> results, given that the manual ones are legally authoritative.
>>>>> To bury the ICT agenda for good, the amendments propose total
>>>>> mutilation of Section 44 (use of technology) by deleting subsections
>>>>> 5, 6, 7 & 8.
>>>>> One gets the feeling that these amendments are more geared towards
>>>>> supporting ICT-illiterate lawyers in the next presidential petition.
>>>>>
>>>>> read more:
>>>>> http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560-
>>>>> 4124394-k96oxc/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/4/17, Lawrence Dinga, CISSP via kictanet
>>>>> <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>> > I completely concur with the views so far.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It is evident from the current mood of the country that the
>>>>> amendments to
>>>>> > the Election Laws are not all inclusive and the general feeling is
>>>>> that it
>>>>> > is more of a political game undermining the electoral commission
>>>>> ahead of
>>>>> > the repeat presidential elections. As Barrack says, our key interest
>>>>> is
>>>>> > promoting the best use of ICT to bring lasting solutions to our
>>>>> myriad
>>>>> > problems.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > As we are aware, the contentious issue that led to the nullification
>>>>> of the
>>>>> > presidential election was that IEBC refused to open the servers for
>>>>> scrutiny
>>>>> > and get the logs for analysis. The reason they were citing is that
>>>>> servers
>>>>> > are not located in Kenya and "the custodians were still asleep"
>>>>> while the
>>>>> > logs were needed by the Supreme Court. This brings my point of Data
>>>>> > Protection and Residency Laws in Kenya. (Please I do apologise in
>>>>> advance
>>>>> > incase there are any such laws which I am ignorant of). If only
>>>>> KICTANet
>>>>> > could engage in such initiatives as to help Kenya in having Data
>>>>> Protection
>>>>> > and Residency Laws, then that would solve a lot of problems for the
>>>>> nation.
>>>>> > As it turns out, many of us were victims of data privacy violations
>>>>> in 2013
>>>>> > when most of us found themselves to be members of various political
>>>>> parties
>>>>> > without their knowledge. Technology is changing rapidly and shaping
>>>>> our ways
>>>>> > of life and that is why even Europe is replacing the old EU Data
>>>>> Protection
>>>>> > Directive which has been there since 1998 with the new legislation
>>>>> that is
>>>>> > far more comprehensive than our old Act, the journey that started
>>>>> way back
>>>>> > in 2012.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We can start somewhere by KICTANet initiating stakeholders workshops
>>>>> to
>>>>> > educate the public on basic understanding of personal data, what data
>>>>> > privacy means to everyone, protecting your digital identity and how
>>>>> to
>>>>> > respond to a data breach. This may culminate into some select
>>>>> committee of
>>>>> > technology and legal professionals to draft our data protection
>>>>> regulation.
>>>>> > I think by this we will have contributed something we can be proud
>>>>> of as
>>>>> > KICTANet instead of involving ourselves in a process which is viewed
>>>>> by many
>>>>> > Kenyans as not all inclusive and could be having some sinister
>>>>> motives.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > That is just my opinion
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Lawrence Dinga, MSc. (InfoSec & Forensics), CISSP
>>>>> > Managecom Systems Ltd
>>>>> > +254 721226324/ 0733973999
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > From: Ali Hussein via kictanet
>>>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2017 11:57 AM
>>>>> > To: ldinga at managecom.co.ke
>>>>> > Cc: Ali Hussein
>>>>> > Subject: Re: [kictanet] Call for input into Election Laws
>>>>> (Amendment) Bill,
>>>>> > 2017 and Election Offences (Amendment) Bill 2017
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I agree with Barrack.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We may object to some or all of the amendments but we must adhere to
>>>>> the
>>>>> > spirit of our new constitution, part of which specifically urges the
>>>>> Govt
>>>>> > and the citizenry to engage through public participation. It is also
>>>>> > critical that we in the sector don’t create a vacuum in this space
>>>>> for
>>>>> > nature surely abhors a vacuum.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Ali Hussein
>>>>> > Principal
>>>>> > Hussein & Associates
>>>>> > +254 0713 601113
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Twitter: @AliHKassim
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Skype: abu-jomo
>>>>> >
>>>>> > LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act
>>>>> but a
>>>>> > habit." ~ Aristotle
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Sent from my iPad
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 4 Oct 2017, at 10:21 AM, Barrack Otieno via kictanet
>>>>> > <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Hi John,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I think it is worth commenting otherwise someone else will comment
>>>>> on
>>>>> > our behalf. We have many Kenyans with public interest at heart who
>>>>> > contribute towards the many strides this country makes yet we keep
>>>>> > reversing the same without thinking through well. We should rise
>>>>> up in
>>>>> > one accord and say no to what is not right for our nation without
>>>>> fear
>>>>> > or favour, i beleive the network is apolitical, our key interest in
>>>>> > promoting the best use of ICT's.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 10/4/17, John Kieti <jkieti at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > My sense is that the ammendments are rushed if not too
>>>>> reactionary.
>>>>> > Also
>>>>> >
>>>>> > too close to an election (Just days!). As Grace Bomu observes,
>>>>> there is
>>>>> >
>>>>> > much we could contribute but with the nature of the process, you
>>>>> wonder
>>>>> >
>>>>> > whether its worth putting our valuable time in it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Barrack Otieno via kictanet <
>>>>> >
>>>>> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Dear Grace,
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I object to the amendments . I have gone through the bill and
>>>>> found
>>>>> >
>>>>> > some of the amendments to be ill advised. I think we should
>>>>> always
>>>>> >
>>>>> > uphold the spirit of the law other than the letter of the law.
>>>>> For
>>>>> >
>>>>> > instance when we say that in the event manual transmission
>>>>> defers
>>>>> > from
>>>>> >
>>>>> > electronic transmission the manual transmission will carry the
>>>>> day
>>>>> > yet
>>>>> >
>>>>> > we know basic principles of computing such as Garbage in
>>>>> Garbage out
>>>>> >
>>>>> > (GIGO) or What You See is What you get (WYSWYG) it shows that
>>>>> the
>>>>> >
>>>>> > processes and use of electronic system as supplementary aids is
>>>>> >
>>>>> > misunderstood why should we entertain a situation where the
>>>>> input
>>>>> >
>>>>> > differs from the output. Electronic aids only make the system
>>>>> more
>>>>> >
>>>>> > efficient and effective they don't alter results unless there
>>>>> is
>>>>> >
>>>>> > interference.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On another note, we have new members of parliament who are
>>>>> just being
>>>>> >
>>>>> > inducted, it would therefore be untrue to claim that they have
>>>>> >
>>>>> > understood the election management system and processes which
>>>>> have
>>>>> >
>>>>> > taken time to develop and now want to dismantle it to suit
>>>>> temporary
>>>>> >
>>>>> > political interests , i think we should uphold the interests
>>>>> of the
>>>>> >
>>>>> > country first and i would urge our elected leaders to be at
>>>>> the fore
>>>>> >
>>>>> > front of this effort. The election laws might not be perfect
>>>>> but it
>>>>> >
>>>>> > would be prudent to have a consensus based approach of
>>>>> scrutinizing
>>>>> >
>>>>> > any weak areas and addressing the same based on merit.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Finally and in my humble opinion, in as much as we have
>>>>> deployed
>>>>> >
>>>>> > technology and used technology to make many advances in
>>>>> different
>>>>> >
>>>>> > spheres of our nation, we are yet to fully embrace and
>>>>> intergrate
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Information Technology Governance principles and practices in
>>>>> our
>>>>> >
>>>>> > institutions be they public or private. I think this is our
>>>>> archilles
>>>>> >
>>>>> > heel and this are the issues that might need to be addressed.
>>>>> We
>>>>> >
>>>>> > deploy good systems but lack the manners to use the same
>>>>> correctly
>>>>> > let
>>>>> >
>>>>> > alone protect the data under our custody. A data protection
>>>>> act will
>>>>> >
>>>>> > help resolve some of this challenges we are trying to resolve
>>>>> >
>>>>> > politically, the election laws amendment bill is just a red
>>>>> herring,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > technology is here to stay and will continue affecting every
>>>>> aspect
>>>>> > of
>>>>> >
>>>>> > our lives if we don't address IT, IT will address us
>>>>> politically and
>>>>> >
>>>>> > socially sooner than later.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Regards
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Best Regards
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 10/3/17, Grace Mutung'u (Bomu) via kictanet
>>>>> >
>>>>> > <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Hi all,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > There is a lot to say about the substance of the proposed
>>>>> law but I
>>>>> >
>>>>> > think
>>>>> >
>>>>> > the process is ill advised. There should be no amendments to
>>>>> the
>>>>> > law
>>>>> >
>>>>> > given
>>>>> >
>>>>> > the very limited time period before the rerun.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > And although we have been invited because we care about
>>>>> technology,
>>>>> > I
>>>>> >
>>>>> > would
>>>>> >
>>>>> > like to believe that we also care about the nation. We shall
>>>>> > achieve
>>>>> >
>>>>> > very
>>>>> >
>>>>> > little in terms of building trust in our processes and
>>>>> institutions
>>>>> > in
>>>>> >
>>>>> > such
>>>>> >
>>>>> > a rushed process. Shelve this law.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On 2 Oct 2017 16:57, "Grace Githaiga via kictanet" <
>>>>> >
>>>>> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Listers
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Greetings!
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > KICTANet has been invited on Thursday October 5, 2017, to a
>>>>> > meeting of
>>>>> >
>>>>> > the
>>>>> >
>>>>> > select committees on Election laws 2017. Considering that
>>>>> there
>>>>> > will
>>>>> >
>>>>> > be
>>>>> >
>>>>> > many other groups participating, we would like to present a
>>>>> > memorandum
>>>>> >
>>>>> > containing our specific concerns as they pertain to tech
>>>>> issues.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Further, we realize that the time is too short to hold a
>>>>> > moderated
>>>>> >
>>>>> > debate
>>>>> >
>>>>> > and therefore would like to hear from you on specific tech
>>>>> issues.
>>>>> > We
>>>>> >
>>>>> > have
>>>>> >
>>>>> > to do this by *Wednesday October 4, 2017 at** 2 p.m.
>>>>> *Thereafter,
>>>>> > I
>>>>> >
>>>>> > and
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Kanini Mutemi will collate the views in readiness for
>>>>> Thursday.
>>>>> > In
>>>>> >
>>>>> > addition, it would be good for those who participated in
>>>>> the
>>>>> > KICTANet
>>>>> >
>>>>> > observation mission on August 8, 2017 to also attend this
>>>>> > Thursday
>>>>> >
>>>>> > meeting.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We attach the two bills, and would like to draw your
>>>>> attention
>>>>> > to:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 1. Election Laws (Amendment) Bill
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > - Clause 6 (Electronic AND manual transmission of
>>>>> presidential
>>>>> >
>>>>> > election results, with manual taking precedence).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > - Clause 7 (Substantially amends Section 44 of the
>>>>> Elections
>>>>> > Act
>>>>> >
>>>>> > which
>>>>> >
>>>>> > prescribes the use of technology in the conduct of
>>>>> elections).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > - Clause 8 (Amends Section 44A on use of a complementary
>>>>> > mechanism
>>>>> >
>>>>> > for
>>>>> >
>>>>> > identification of voters).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > - Clause 9 (Amends Section 83 on the effect of
>>>>> non-compliance).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > - Clause 11 (Criminal liability for failing to sign
>>>>> documents).
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2. Election Offences (Amendment) Bill-
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > - Clause 2 (Amends Election Offences Act to allow the
>>>>> government
>>>>> > to
>>>>> >
>>>>> > publish advertisements on its achievements during the
>>>>> election
>>>>> >
>>>>> > period).
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Kindlyprovide your input by providing which clause you
>>>>> think is
>>>>> >
>>>>> > problematic, what your concerns are, and the
>>>>> recommendations.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Asanteni sana.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Rgds
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Grace
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > -----------------------------
>>>>> -------------------------------
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ----------------------
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > *Grace Githaiga*
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Twitter: @ggithaiga
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Skype: gracegithaiga
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gracegithaiga
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > .*..**the most important office in a democracy is the
>>>>> citizen. So,
>>>>> > you
>>>>> >
>>>>> > see, that’s what our democracy demands. It needs
>>>>> you!----Barrack
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Obama.*
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> >
>>>>> > kictanet mailing list
>>>>> >
>>>>> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > mailman/options/kictanet/nmutungu%40gmail.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a
>>>>> multi-stakeholder
>>>>> >
>>>>> > platform
>>>>> >
>>>>> > for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT
>>>>> policy
>>>>> > and
>>>>> >
>>>>> > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for
>>>>> reform in
>>>>> > the
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ICT
>>>>> >
>>>>> > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled
>>>>> growth and
>>>>> >
>>>>> > development.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of
>>>>> acceptable
>>>>> > behaviors
>>>>> >
>>>>> > online that you follow in real life: respect people's
>>>>> times and
>>>>> >
>>>>> > bandwidth,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize,
>>>>> respect
>>>>> > privacy,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > do
>>>>> >
>>>>> > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Barrack O. Otieno
>>>>> >
>>>>> > +254721325277
>>>>> >
>>>>> > +254733206359
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Skype: barrack.otieno
>>>>> >
>>>>> > PGP ID: 0x2611D86A
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> >
>>>>> > kictanet mailing list
>>>>> >
>>>>> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > mailman/options/kictanet/jkieti%40gmail.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>>>>> > platform
>>>>> >
>>>>> > for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT
>>>>> policy and
>>>>> >
>>>>> > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform
>>>>> in the
>>>>> > ICT
>>>>> >
>>>>> > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and
>>>>> >
>>>>> > development.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
>>>>> > behaviors
>>>>> >
>>>>> > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and
>>>>> >
>>>>> > bandwidth,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect
>>>>> privacy,
>>>>> > do
>>>>> >
>>>>> > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > John Kieti
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Phone: +254-735-764242 // +254-722-764242
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Twitter: @johnKieti // Skype: jkieti
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Blog: gmeltdown.com <http://www.gmeltdown.com> // LinkedIn:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > https://ke.linkedin.com/in/*kieti* <https://ke.linkedin.com/in/
>>>>> kieti>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The ordinary just won't do
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Barrack O. Otieno
>>>>> > +254721325277
>>>>> > +254733206359
>>>>> > Skype: barrack.otieno
>>>>> > PGP ID: 0x2611D86A
>>>>> >
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > kictanet mailing list
>>>>> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>> > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%
>>>>> 40campusciti.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>>>>> platform
>>>>> > for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>>>> > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the
>>>>> ICT
>>>>> > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and
>>>>> > development.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
>>>>> behaviors
>>>>> > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and
>>>>> bandwidth,
>>>>> > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect
>>>>> privacy, do
>>>>> > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> --------------------
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > kictanet mailing list
>>>>> > kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>> > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>>>> > https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/
>>>>> ldinga%40managecom.co.ke
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>>>>> platform for
>>>>> > people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>>>> > regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the
>>>>> ICT
>>>>> > sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and
>>>>> > development.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
>>>>> behaviors
>>>>> > online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and
>>>>> bandwidth,
>>>>> > share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect
>>>>> privacy, do
>>>>> > not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Barrack O. Otieno
>>>>> +254721325277
>>>>> +254733206359
>>>>> Skype: barrack.otieno
>>>>> PGP ID: 0x2611D86A
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> kictanet mailing list
>>>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>>
>>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
>>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/murigi.muraya%40gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>>>>> platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy
>>>>> and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>>>>
>>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> SMM
>>>>
>>>> *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than
>>>> one who takes a city." Prov 16:32*
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> kictanet mailing list
>>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>>
>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/kaninimutemi%40gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>>>
>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> *Mercy Mutemi, Advocate*.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> kictanet mailing list
>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>>
>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
>>> mailman/options/kictanet/murigi.muraya%40gmail.com
>>>
>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>>
>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> SMM
>>
>> *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one
>> who takes a city." Prov 16:32*
>>
> --
> *Mercy Mutemi, Advocate*.
>
>
>
>
--
SMM
*"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one
who takes a city." Prov 16:32*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20171004/2b7bd556/attachment.htm>
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list