[kictanet] Zero Rating in the African Context - was 'Telkom Kenya cries foul over social media’s free ride on its

Fri Oct 7 06:39:14 EAT 2016

Walu

This is useful and requires some weekend reading. However my first glimpse of the executive summary tells me that the authors of this report AVE dine some good research and are saying that Net Neutrality need to be looked at from an African context. Something that we have advocated in this list for sometime. 

More after I have read the full report. 

Ali Hussein
Principal
Hussein & Associates
+254 0713 601113 

Twitter: @AliHKassim
Skype: abu-jomo
LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim

"Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what no one else has thought".  ~ Albert Szent-Györgyi

Sent from my iPad

> On 6 Oct 2016, at 6:57 PM, Walubengo J via kictanet <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
> 
> @Mwende, Ali et al,
> 
> If up to some academic reading with policy implications, here is some research data on this Zero rating (free ride)  issue. Research covered  the case for Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya & SA.
> 
> >>>> 
> A fresh, public-interested assessment of the zero-rating of certain applications (apps) and platforms in the African mobile prepaid environment is overdue. This policy paper examines the issue of zero-rating within the contexts of the range of discounted and dynamically-priced African mobile network operator (MNO) products, and the priority public policy issues facing the continent in relation to the Internet. The research is based on a four country assessment-Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa.
> >>>
> 
> More @ Research ICT Africa
> 
> 
> Research ICT Africa
> By Creative Storm
> 
> or
> http://researchictafrica.net/home.php?h=190
> 
> walu.
> 
> From: Mwende Njiraini via kictanet <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> To: jwalu at yahoo.com 
> Cc: Mwende Njiraini <mwende.njiraini at gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 10:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Telkom Kenya cries foul over social media’s free ride on its - Corporate News
> 
> Good morning
> 
> The network neutrality debate has landed on the shores of Africa.
> 
> Here is an excerpt of an academic paper i had written some time back.
> 
> The net neutrality debate can be viewed as the next battle between the netheads and the bellheads; providers of broadband access on one side and Internet content and application providers on the other side. Frieden (cited Orlowski 2006) states that the Bellheads are investing heavily in fiber capability which will solve a problem that the “Netheads” have proved themselves unable or unwilling to tackle, that of high quality video over IP.
>  
> Given that US government is keen to facilitate the rollout of universal and affordable broadband[1].  It can be argued that the aggressive fiber rollouts could suffer if network operator shares continue to lose value making it difficult to blame the companies if they did slow down roll out. The companies, after all, have a duty to shareholders to pursue maximum profits not necessarily to fulfill the goals of Internet advocates (Drucker, 2006).   However one has to be careful in analysing the market as forces in telecommunications can be misleading. Telephone companies, for example, get billions of dollars in federal and state subsidies for rural service.   Access charges are designed to compensate network providers for the use of their facilities and the compensation scheme is in part funds universal service.  Additionally, these companies may be claiming more in the depreciation and the value of their assets. 
>  
> Regulators may therefore seek to eliminate access charges by allowing rates to rise to cover network cost if not service providers should pay access charges.  This is however difficult to implement politically on the basis of public interest.  Additionally, it is equally difficult to expect new entrants to pay access since the avoidance of access is, at least in part, the source of their perceived competitive advantage. 
>  
> Historically, the FCC has not regulated the Internet or the services provided over it. However following the 9/11 terror attacks in the US, security is a key government priority.  Consequently, open access to the Internet articulated in the FCC “Four Network Freedoms”, is subject to legality of content and needs of law enforcement (Frieden, 2006)    The FCC is thus constantly reviewing mechanisms[2] to implement important social objectives, such as public safety, law enforcement access, consumer protection and disability access, as communications migrate to Internet-enabled services.
>  
> On Wednesday, 28th June 2006 the Senate commerce panel voted against amending the telecommunications bill by attaching the net neutrality provisions that would prevent operators from blocking, degrading or prioritising service on their networks (Orlowski, 2006).  The defeat of the amendment could herald the return of the vertically integrated incumbent firm providing services along the whole value chain.  Despite the fact that the access network has been considered a natural monopoly area as a single firm could presumably construct and provide local services at a lower average cost than two or more firms (Spulber, 2002)[3], Sir Tim Berners-Lee, the creator of the web, views the defeat of the net neutrality legislation as the entering a “dark period” for the Internet, if access suppliers were allowed to choose which traffic to prioritise (BBC, 2006). 
>  
> The higher costs of a “tiered Internet” levied content providers will simply be passed on to consumers, directly or indirectly. As there is no “free ride” on the network, and consumers will bear the costs of network development through higher access charges and higher prices for online goods and services[4]. Moreover, a “tiered Internet” will further concentrate the market power of the cable modem and DSL duopoly, eliminating competition in the conduits and leaving consumers with no escape from content discrimination.
>  
> The potential return of the two tiered Internet may further widen the digital divide between developed and developing countries.  It may be argued that successful internet organizations should contribute to the cost of internet infrastructure either through Internet settlement agreements or contribution to universal access funds.  This argument is based on the fact that these companies are providing functional equivalent services, thus there is a need for operators to maintain network integrity and for governments to guarantee national security, and I concur.
> 
> [1] FCC defines "high speed" as 200 kilobits in at least one direction.
> [2] On February 12, 2004, the FCC ruled that an entirely Internet-based VoIP service would be an unregulated information service in USA.  However the FCC released an order requiring VoIP providers to deliver enhanced 911 emergency services to its customers.   Source: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/emergencies.html
> [3] This theory is based on the assumption that firms will seek to leverage on economies of scale to achieve production efficiencies, pricing services above cost and not precluding competition
> [4] Scott (2006) predicts that companies like Google and Yahoo that support their free services through advertising revenue will raise their advertising rates, resulting in higher consumer prices on all the goods that advertise on these sites.  While Amazon and eBay will raise their rates to account for the extra charges and I-Tunes and other pay-per-download content sites will charge higher rates as well, to cover access charges by AT&T and Verizon.
> 
> Disclaimer: Views expressed except those referenced are the author's own.  The full paper is available on request.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Ali Hussein via kictanet <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
> Listers
> 
> This is getting abit tiring..Telcos complaining social media platforms are getting a free ride on their infrastructure.
> 
> http://www. businessdailyafrica.com/ Corporate-News/Telkom-Kenya- cries-foul-over-social-media/ 539550-3379938-9liqm4/
> 
> What are your thoughts? Should Telcos charge companies like Google and Facebook for access to their networks? 
> 
> What would be next? A small fee for every website? 
> 
> #NetNeutrality
> 
> Ali Hussein
> Principal
> Hussein & Associates
> +254 0713 601113 
> 
> Twitter: @AliHKassim
> Skype: abu-jomo
> LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin. com/in/alihkassim
> 
> 
> "Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what no one else has thought".  ~ Albert Szent-Györgyi
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> ______________________________ _________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> 
> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/options/kictanet/ mwende.njiraini%40gmail.com
> 
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
> 
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> 
> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com
> 
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
> 
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> 
> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com
> 
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
> 
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20161007/66c7c296/attachment.htm>