[kictanet] Day 2(a) of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback - Human Capital Feedback

Tue Nov 29 19:38:54 EAT 2016

Hi Walu,
My comments inline.
Regards,

> Summary feedback on Human Capital was as follows with detailed document
> attached.
>
> *a) 41% of the respondents felt that the government had provided
> sufficient ICT opportunities for the youth to a moderate extent. 30%
> however felt youth opportunities had not been effectively provided, while
> 27% felt it had been done to a large extent.*
>
I look forward though to the day when we move from quantity matters( how
many youth were provided with opportunities) to quality matters (who are
these youth? how did the opportunities change their communities? has
providing youth with opportunities helped us to curb rural urban migration
etc) 

> *b) 58% of the respondents felt that the DLP (Laptop Project) will have a
> positive impact to a very large extent. 30% felt it would be a moderate
> impact while 12% think it will have little or no impact.*
>
I have great faith in the DLP project. I hope that by the time DLP
children complete KCPE, many will be curious about technology and that
 those who join youth polytechnics will be able to assemble rudimentary
computers, or whatever we shall be calling them in those days. 

> *c) 40% of the respondents felt that tertiary institutions were, to a
> moderate extent providing the requisite skill set for the ICT industry. 34%
> felt they were to a large extent providing these skills while 24% felt they
> were not.*
>
Maybe it is a bigger problem with the education system but really, the gap
between graduates and markets still exists. I wonder what impact technical
education through TIVETs and Technical universities is having in bridging
the gap
. And overall, what tech is coming out of universities anyway since the
role of the universities cannot be relegated to merely churning
graduates....

> *d) 40% of the respondents felt that Konza City will have a positive
> impact to a very large extent. 21% felt it will be a moderate impact while
> 25% think it will have no impact.*
>
Konza city will also have non ICT related impacts....most obvious being
the value of land around that area. 

> *e) Provide general ICT literacy programmes to the public, Coding as a
> skill to all students – irrespective of discipline, Continuity in
> government offices (rather than sabotage of previous holder initiatives),
> Improve Academia- Government-Industry linkages, Cryptography training,
> Identify and support Technology Universities, Promote Incubation Center,
> Have mechanisms to weed out ICT quacks, Provide ICT scholarships,
> Standardize ICT Trainings, Digitization of key services - police occurrence
> books, land registries should be availed to the youth.*
>
In addition, let Government lead from the front by purchasing/promoting
local ICT products....Is there an e-citizen app yet?  

> Toa maoni (let hear your reactions)
>
> walu.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack at gmail.com>
> *To:* Walubengo J <jwalu at yahoo.com>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:47 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [kictanet] Day 1 of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback -
> Policy, Legal & Regulatory Issues
>
> Listers,
>
> We welcome  more feedback  on day 1 discussions on how we have
> performed as an industry in 2016 . We will start day two this
> afternoon after providing a summary of day ones discussion should we
> receive feedback by then.
>
> Best Regards
>
> On 11/28/16, Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Walu,
> >
> > Many thanks for the email. My humble opinion is that generally the
> > government and related agencies have made great efforts in investing
> > in ICT's. However it is worth noting that government is never good at
> > marketing itself or communicating and i guess this is where the
> > Ministry and related agencies need to pay attention. For example the
> > issue of IFMIS has really been misunderstood. Software should never be
> > blamed for fraud , people commit Fraud. We should always remember that
> > ICT's are a means to an end and not an end in themselves.
> >
> > Regards
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
> mailman/options/kictanet/nmutungu%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>

-- 
Grace L.N. Mutung'u
Nairobi Kenya
Skype: gracebomu
Twitter: @Bomu

<http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/profile/GraceMutungu>

PGP ID : 0x33A3450F
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20161129/7339ed06/attachment.htm>