[kictanet] Day 1 of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback - Policy, Legal & Regulatory Issues

[Walubengo J]

mmh,
Very quiet in here..I know silence means consent but will be good to know how many agree/disagree with the findings. For example in point (a).
a) 52% of the respondents felt that the Universal Service Fund(USF) had not met its objective. 40% felt that it had to a moderate extent while 8% felt it had a very large extent.
It would be nice to know why those who felt USF has NOT performed to elaborate why. Better still, the 8% who thought they had performed to give us a few examples.
We only have 1day on this since tomorrow we look at the next set of results.
walu.

      From: Walubengo J <jwalu at yahoo.com>
 To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>; ISOC Kenya Chapter <isoc at lists.my.co.ke> 
 Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 9:00 AM
 Subject: Day 1 of 3: 2016 ICT Year in Review Feedback - Policy, Legal & Regulatory Issues
   
Listers, (apologies for cross-posting)
Thanks again for those who spared time to provide feedback - so that the rest of us can read and interrogate the same :-)
Over the next 3 days I shall share the feedback and basically hope to get further reactions from the floor.  I attach the feedback document but with summaries below:
1. Policy & Legal Feedback
a) 52% of the respondentsfelt that the Universal Service Fund(USF) had not met its objective. 40% feltthat it had to a moderate extent while 8% felt it had a very large extent.  b) 61% of the respondents felt that ICT Policies and initiativehad not impacted the counties. 23% of the respondents felt that these hadmoderately impacted the counties, while 10% felt they had an impact to a verylarge extent.c) 41% of the respondents felt that the multi-stakeholder approachbetween ICT stakeholders and government was moderately achieved. 31% feltit was not achieved while  25% felt it was, to a very large extent.d) Policy/Legal Issues not yet addressed include: Cyber Crime/Cyber Security Bill and its position in Senate and National Assembly, DataProtection Bill, ICT Practitioners Bill, Privacy Issue Linkages betweenNational & County Governments on ICT matters, Quality of Internet,Infrastructure SharingRegulatory Feedback2. Regulatory Feedbacka) 48% of the respondents felt that the question of affordablecommunications/internet pricing had not been well addressed. 30% felt that thequestion of affordable pricing has been moderately addressed while 20% felt ithas been addressed to a very large extent.b) 68% of the respondents felt that the issue of dominance inthe sector was affecting pricing of communication services to a very largeextent. 16% felt it moderately affected pricing while 13% felt it was reallynot an issue.c) 48% of the respondents felt that the urban-rural digitaldivide had not been adequately addressed while 34% felt that it had beenmoderately addressed while only 7% felt it had been addressed to a very largeextent. d) 65% of the respondents felt that the regulator had notaddressed the issue of inclusivity with regard to persons with disabilities(PWD). 27% felt this had been moderately addressed while only 5% felt it hasbeen addressed to a large extent.e) Areas needing RegulatoryInterventions: Operator Dominance Issues, Internet Pricing & Affordabilityissues, White Spaces, Operationalization of Universal Service Fund &Access, Failed Number Portability, Data protection for Subscriber Data,Conflict between regulatory bodies, Last mile connectivity and Way-leaves,Net-Neutrality, Support for ICT-startups, Support for Digital evidence incourts, Inclusion & Support for Persons With 
Irrespective of whether you participated  in the questionnaire or not, you are invited to comment, support, oppose and/or seek clarifications on the views of stakeholders.Tommorrow we shall post the feedback on Human Capital & Infrastructure.



   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20161128/0c9037aa/attachment.htm>