[kictanet] We will not block free access to Facebook, says government

[Nanjira Sambuli]

Sure thing. And we can also have some of the people who've worked on the
issue in India, who can join in virtually. I'll let you know once paper is
published, as we need this to progress from an objective, evidence-based
rather than emotive, opinion-based view point.


Regards,
Nanjira Sambuli
Research Lead
iHub <http://www.ihub.co.ke/> | Research <http://www.ihub.co.ke/research> |
UXLab <http://www.ihub.co.ke/uxlab> | Consulting
<http://www.ihub.co.ke/consulting>
*Mobile:* +254722481566
*Skype:* nanjirasambuli | *Twitter:* @NiNanjira




On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Many thanks Nanjira,
>
> Maybe you could consider a soft launch for the paper to coincide with with
> a national stakeholder discussion on the same issue. Happy to help set this
> up. I agree with you the issue is not just facebook, there is more that
> needs to be understood and unravelled.
>
> Regards
> On Feb 11, 2016 1:07 PM, "Nanjira Sambuli" <nanjira at ihub.co.ke> wrote:
>
>> I am finalising a paper on this, extensive research on what the issues
>> are. I'll be able to share the published version in the Journal of Cyber
>> Policy by the end of the month.
>> Highlights though:
>> 1. Emerging markets need a different definition of NN. I shared a blog
>> post by Prof Vishal Misra explaining why price discrimination needs to be
>> part of the definition.
>> 2. This is not just about Facebook. Their offering for zero rating is an
>> issue! But alternative forms of zero-rating exist, and will share more
>> examples of such, eg Mozilla's.
>> 3. This is a critical discussion for us, and for it to happen, we need to
>> delink the issues. I will also be on BBC World Service this evening talking
>> about the problematic framing around the battle for net neutrality as
>> denying the poor access to the Internet. It is a shame, that in this day
>> and age, we can be told, or can believe that these aren't issues for us to
>> consider or stand for.
>>
>> More soon.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nanjira.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>
>> On 11 Feb 2016, at 12:47, Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nanjira,
>>
>> I think we need a sober discussion on this matter for it to be fully
>> understood. Kictanet can take a lead on this.
>>
>> Regards
>> On Feb 11, 2016 11:27 AM, "Nanjira Sambuli via kictanet" <
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>
>>> The CS is cited as saying that we won't go the India route.
>>>
>>> I'm amazed at how reporting on the TRAI decision has been summarised to
>>> banning Free Basics; the bigger picture and ruling relegated to the back
>>> seat...
>>>
>>>
>>> http://nairobinews.nation.co.ke/news/will-block-free-access-facebook-says-government/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nanjira.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> kictanet mailing list
>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>
>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otieno.barrack%40gmail.com
>>>
>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>>
>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20160211/a1b42f14/attachment.htm>