[kictanet] ICT Authority to weed out quacks

JImmy Gitonga jimmygitts at gmail.com
Fri Dec 2 14:35:09 EAT 2016


Wow Andrew,

It seems that is everyone's journey here until "recently" when Computer
Science became a course in our universities. I am a "quack" as much as you
are.

I loved the story and all the best.

So, Listers, this is my take. The problem is that the government has
allowed tenderpreneurs to flourish in every sector, and the experts in the
government, who ought to supervise, are compromised for various reasons.

We are just feeling the heat now because we are in the way of the rent
seekers. Look at our mechanical engineering sector and see the chaos caused
by "regulation".

Regards

Jimmy Gitonga
*Web and Motion*


On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 2:12 PM, <kictanet-request at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
wrote:

> Send kictanet mailing list submissions to
>         kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         kictanet-request at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         kictanet-owner at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of kictanet digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: ICT Authority to weed out quacks (Andrew Alston)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:10:41 +0000
> From: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
> To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority to weed out quacks
> Message-ID:
>         <AMSPR03MB534A8D637B9580FA82CDF1AEE8E0 at AMSPR03MB534.
> eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi All,
>
> I wade into this debate with a great degree of caution, but at the same
> time I feel it would be amiss not to tell my own story ? and let you judge
> my stance from that.
>
> When I was 12 years old, living in South Africa, I walked door to door at
> every computer shop in the town I lived in, begging for a chance to help
> out in the stores ? I didn?t want money ? I wanted to be near the
> machines.  There was a guy, interestingly he shared my first name, and
> decided he?d give me a chance, and so at 12 years old I started showing up
> on Saturdays and installing dos on machines and installing windows 3.1 and
> hanging around their workshop.  By the time I was 13, I was putting
> together machines for them. They were even kind enough to give me the
> equivalent of 140 KSH for a Saturday morning.
>
> Somewhere along the way, I got hold of a copy of turbo pascal and begged
> pleaded and borrowed some manuals and taught myself how to program, first
> in pascal, and then in assembler.  By the time I was 16, I was then faced
> with a choice.  I could stick with high school, finish, leave at the same
> time as everyone else, go to universities, spend years getting a degree,
> and then enter the job market at the same time as all my school friends.
> Or, due to the age of the industry and how new it was where I was growing
> up, I could leave school, get a job, and get a 2 and a half year experience
> head start on everyone I was at school with.  I made my choice, and in
> around March, 3 months into grade 10, I clearly remember getting up in the
> middle of science class, and walking out.  I never went back.
>
> By the time I left though, I had already organized myself a job, relying
> on the experience I had working in computer stores for the previous 3 and a
> half odd years, and relying on the fact that I could already program.  So,
> I got on a bus, at age 16, travelled a thousand kilometres down to Cape
> Town and started my working life.  Over the next few years, I worked my ass
> off, earned just enough money to keep me afloat, and eventually started my
> own IT security company, got defrauded, went broke as a result, got up, and
> started again.  Eventually ending up working for the University of Cape
> Town in their IT department.  While there I started moonlighting for TENET
> (the South African academic network), and eventually ended up as their CTO
> where I was for 6 years.  After leaving there and doing a whole bunch of
> contracting (primarily for various universities), I took a contract with
> Liquid which eventually ended up becoming permanent and I ended up where I
> am today, in a senior position building networks across the continent.
>
> The point of this story is ? there are individuals out there who have
> chosen a different route ? I am not alone in the path I took, and I am not
> special, I was not born to wealth and honestly I don?t think I could have
> afforded to go to University anyway ? my parents certainly didn?t have the
> money to pay for it, nor was I born with insane brain power, I merely chose
> to find my own path and work hard to reach the heights I have.  And in all
> of this ? I fail to see why any system should penalize people such as
> myself, and indirectly penalize the people who I could share my knowledge
> and experience with.  I fail to see why a qualification actually matters if
> someone can *prove* they can do the job ? and do it well, with an equal
> amount of passion, drive and skill, however it was acquired.
>
> Obviously, this post is written from an intensely personal perspective,
> but I argue that there are many who shared the path I chose to walk, and I
> believe that anything that removes the ability of these people to
> contribute to society and to our industry, is unfair, dangerous and against
> the interests of the industry as a whole.
>
> I know that I am PROUD to work in this industry, it is with pride that I
> stand among my colleagues, both Kenyan and otherwise, both certified and
> non-certified, and I just want the opportunity to continue the work I have
> dedicated the last 21 years of my life to and continue to build this
> industry and be able to contribute.
>
> Just my thoughts
>
> Andrew
>
>
> From: kictanet [mailto:kictanet-bounces+andrew.alston=liquidtelecom.
> com at lists.kictanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of Dorcas Muthoni via kictanet
> Sent: 02 December 2016 11:53
> To: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
> Cc: Dorcas Muthoni <dmuthoni at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority to weed out quacks
>
>
> Unfortunately, judging from my experience,  both in public and private
> sector, HR and top IT management do indeed either get it wrong, lack
> ability or sometimes objectivity while onboarding vendors or staff.
>
> In which case,  industry professionals can help in defining a criteria for
> all. This of course should also be shared with tertiary institutions and
> universities.
>
> As we know,  new professions are being defined daily. Some core
> fundamentals remain the same.
>
> On Dec 2, 2016 11:27 AM, "Francis Nderitu via kictanet" <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
> In my own view this kind of vetting they are asking for should be
> institutional but not individual - which is already happening naturally.
> Does Company A have the capacity to offer service XYZ? That kind of
> approach could be helpful, just like in the construction industry, diffrent
> companies have diffrent clearance level.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Nelson J kwaje via kictanet <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
>
> @James,
>
> I like how people are open minded about ICT professional.  it is okay to
> be a drop out, it is okay to not have any qualifications, just have passion
> and be good at what you do.
>
> Doctors and Pilots used to be treated the same way. few  regulations, few
> standards and no regularity body  until we realized that our lives depends
> on these people and their mistakes can be catastrophic.
>
> The ICT Industry is heading in the same direction. our errors  are
> starting to cause some serious damages  and the society is right when it
> demands some yardstick to know who is who.
>
> Will you fly with an uncertified pilot ?
>
> Can you go to the  operating theater  with a passionate and committed
> doctor but no certificate ?
>
> Why will you accept anyone to mange  the system for your bank, hospital,
> airport and even national security.
>
> Cheers
>
> Nelson
>
>
> On 02/12/2016 10:42 WD, James Muendo wrote:
> Nelson,
>
> "we can not sit and and watch as the industry gets  diluted in the name of
> innovation and disruption."
>
> I think what you have quoted there is what drives the profession and the
> industry at large. What you are suggesting is we curb creativity of people
> who seek to curb a niche out of the huge industry. As Ahmed said, this is
> not like professions, like, being a doctor or a lawyer that have a pre-set
> set of standards. If anything, the industry thrives on its dynamic nature,
> which leads to disruption and innovation.
>
> On that I beg to disagree with you. Also, in terms of standards, if we
> look outside .KE, what other country/town has ICT standards?
>
> Am with Ngigi in this one, we need to separate business from profession.
> The tricky bit, would be, what criteria will you use to do so.
>
> Regards,
>
> On 2 December 2016 at 10:28, Nelson J kwaje via kictanet <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
>
> Let us face it, the ICT Industry has a problem with  standards,
>  ambiguity rules the ICT Industry in Kenya.  the words below can have as
> many meanings as the are ICT professionals
>
>   *   Cloud Solution
>   *   Software Architect
>   *   Software Developer
>   *   IoT
>   *   Web APP
>   *   and many other
>
> we can not sit and and watch as the industry gets  diluted in the name of
> innovation and disruption.
>
>
> On 02/12/2016 10:12 WD, Dorcas Muthoni via kictanet wrote:
>
> My point is,  chaos are eminent in the industry.  Is it what we want.. NO.
>
> Then, let's agree on the criteria. ICT Authority is part of the KICTANET
> community, let's engage them, instead of shooting in your defense. Let's
> get a constructive multi-stakeholder engagement.
>
> I am afraid that having a few highly opinionated people rule mailing lists
> stalls multi-stakeholder participation.
>
> I hope that the ICT Authority is listening somewhere.
>
> On Dec 2, 2016 10:00 AM, "Ahmed Mohamed Maawy via kictanet" <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
> Its not really about why people feel insecure. Its about what policy is
> meant to do. Why? Technologists are not doctors or lawyers.
> With all due respect. What does the education system offer as a yardstick
> for competence? Most of us got jobs before we even graduated school. And we
> went on to work for projects and institutions that went on to win Awards in
> the international arena.
>
> You see, IT is not about being a Doctor or being a Lawyer (where theory is
> a factor). IT is an operational field. IT, more than any other field - is
> based on Talent. Not much on Knowledge. This is why we have so many people
> out of Uni looking for Internships that they can not find. In a market
> where the dynamics are governed by people who did not even do that degree -
> to drive technical jobs.
>
> And yes, we have several CEOs in several companies who (and some of them
> entrepreneur their own way through) did not even do a BCom at the least.
> Some of them did not even see an higher learning institution.
> We need to understand that the market dynamics are shifting. Schools in
> developing are evolving. Why? Because Technology has changed the education
> field. The education field is not changing technology. Apologies if we
> believe so.
> Just my two cents.
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Collins Areba via kictanet <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
> @Dorcas.
> Before we even get to answering why many people are insecure about the
> discussion, I would point to the more obvious question. What are the
> protagonists trying to do? what are they trying to solve? Unfortunately
> thus far, It is not clear. What is in need of regulation? and why does it
> need to be regulated? is this regulation for regulation's sake?
>
> I did mention yesterday that from my point of view, Regulation makes sense
> only where there is a limited resource, shared by many, which left without
> regulation would result in disorder and "law of the jungle". Which ICT
> component is this that needs to be streamlined to prevent it from
> spiralling out of control?
>
> From where I sit, It feels like a bunch of individuals feel shortchanged
> about the time, effort and money they spent in learning "the science" only
> to come out here and find the arena flattened by the same technology. It
> feels like "the bill" which seeks to assign non existent value to those
> that feel some level of entitlement to that "ict professional" title purely
> on the basis of having done ICT formally.
>
> I stand corrected.
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Dorcas Muthoni via kictanet <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
>
> Why are so many people insecure about this topic.
>
> Can a bank CEO act as the principal legal officer of a bank? Why not?
>
> Which Innovators are these people are referring to?  As far as I know,
> most of the referenced global innovators dropped out of some computer
> science programs and employ thousands of highly qualified CS and
> engineering graduates.
>
> I don't think starting a box-pushing or software license reselling entity
> coupled with hiring a few technicians can turn anyone into a domain
> professional.  Let's get this straight and boldly address the true issues
> at hand.
>
> Obviously,  this loose arrangement is leading to the proliferation of
> extreme tender-prenuership.
>
> Can anyone point me to potential local Bill Gates, Larry Page or Mark Mark
> Zuckerberg. We can't use such example to complicate this discussion.
>
> If anything, we should be providing a friendly environment those with
> money and great experience invest in highly scalable startups.
>
> Nothing bars anyone who falls short of an agreed criteria from working on
> it.
>
> Obviously,  we cannot water down such an important topic.
>
> On Dec 1, 2016 10:28 PM, "Alfred Kinyua via kictanet" <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
>
> Two things stand out, concerning ICT Authority.
> 1. Conformance of set standards (raising the bar).
> 2. locking out unqualified personnel, where government has interests .
> This is not a trivial issue, because one might be qualified but
> incompetent (theorists) / unsitable, while the opposite might be true,
> unqualufied but competent/suitable, this is true for ICT realtad mattets.
> Personally I thing further probing is required.
>
> On Dec 1, 2016 22:01, "Beryl Aidi via kictanet" <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Law and policy seldom exist in a vacuum. Does anyone know anywhere in the
> world where the kind of regulation or ICT standards being anticipated to be
> used to weed out quacks have been used successfully? Successfully here
> being key, which means no victimization of those without any certifications
> that may exist; startups; or those just playing around and happen to
> stumble on something that may end up taking the world by storm; and by no
> means a way to stifle internet freedoms. Anyone knows where such a model
> exists? My two cents.
>
> Beryl Aidi
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Waithaka Ngigi via kictanet <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
> In summary... ICT is "...A coalition of The Willing..."
>
> Waithaka Ngigi
>
> Alliance Technologies
> www.at.co.ke<http://www.at.co.ke>
> From: Collins Areba via kictanet
> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2016 9:30 PM
> To: Ngigi Waithaka
> Reply To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
> Cc: Collins Areba; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority to weed out quacks
>
>
>
> Exactly!
> ICT is a disruptive sector. It is unfortunate when we attempt to define it
> as one would engineering, or architecture, or survey. The action - reaction
> - feedback - correction continum time wise is soo tiny. A decision for
> instance in some of these association, say which colour to paint a wall
> might take four months.
>
> I would still ask, what is the problem we are trying to solve? If this can
> be defined we should be in a position to find solutions collectively.
>
> On 1 Dec 2016 21:12, "Mwendwa Kivuva" <Kivuva at transworldafrica.com<mailto:
> Kivuva at transworldafrica.com>> wrote:
>
> The said procurement quacks are like Josephine Kabura. But they are not
> really quacks because they work as conduits for their masters in high
> places.
>
> If it was possible to weed out "quacks" from the industry, the said
> masters would still use the "professionals" to commit heinous crimes.
>
> Show me major scandals in Kenya conducted by quacks and I will show you a
> liar. Goldenberg, Anglo-leasing, euro bond...
>
> On Dec 1, 2016 7:36 PM, "Collins Areba via kictanet" <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
>
> I believe regulation should only be present where there is a limited,
> shared resource that might be subject to abuse. Short of having a set of
> rules: don't test an EMP in a built up area, don't access government
> servers even if their passwords are admin, admin. Don't give the
> president's number on twitter, etc etc etc. That is progressive legislation.
>
> On 1 Dec 2016 18:24, "Collins Areba" <arebacollins at gmail.com<mailto:
> arebacollins at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Dorcas: show me the chaos. Then we discuss order.
>
> On 1 Dec 2016 18:17, "James Muendo" <james at muendo.co.ke<mailto:jam
> es at muendo.co.ke>> wrote:
> Collins,
>
> +1
>
>
> --
> James Muendo
>
> Chief Executive Officer (CEO),
>
> Logic Craft Ltd,
>
> Suite 39, 2nd Floor, Visions Plaza, Mombasa Road
>
> P.O Box 28016 ? 00200,
>
> Nairobi,KE
>
>
>
> M:| +254.725.567.508 S: | tim.rick Gtalk:| james.muendo T: | @MmuendoW:|
> http://about.me/muendo
>
>
>
> Too Brief? Here's Why
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:15 PM +0300, "Collins Areba via kictanet" <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
>
> Personally I seek examples of the damage done by the said quacks that
> professional institutions haven't done. The distinct point of departure
> which will show the distinct difference so as to justify regulation.
>
> On 1 Dec 2016 17:32, "waudo siganga via kictanet" <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
> Kivuva, you forgot Zuckerberg.
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Mwendwa Kivuva via kictanet wrote:
> College drop outs who rule the world.
>
> Michael Saul Dell, William Henry ?Bill? Gates iii, Paul Gardner Allen,
> Lawrence Joseph Ellison, Stephen ?Woz? Wozniak, Steven Paul Jobs, Robert
> Edward ?Ted? Turner iii
> http://lord.me.ke/college-dropouts-who-rule-the-world/
>
> I wonder who among those would be considered an ICT pro in Kenya.
>
> ______________________
> Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
> twitter.com/lordmwesh<http://twitter.com/lordmwesh>
>
>
>
> On 1 December 2016 at 12:03, Ali Hussein via kictanet <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
> The real important question has not been answered. Not since the term ICT
> started being used.
>
> WHO IS AN ICT PRACTITIONER?
>
> And who is this WATCHDOG who will abrogate himself/herself the role of
> GateKeeper and RentSeeker?
>
> Ali Hussein
> Principal
> Hussein & Associates
> +254 0713 601113<tel:+254%20713%20601113>
>
>
> Twitter: @AliHKassim
>
> Skype: abu-jomo
>
> LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
>
> "Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking
> what no one else has thought".  ~ Albert Szent-Gy?rgyi
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 1 Dec 2016, at 10:51 AM, Athar Ahmad Bhatti via kictanet <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
>
> Brian they will implant a chip in your brain and track your IQ to see
> whether you are fit for IT. Whereas the millennial generation will lose
> most as they are hands on.
>
> Athar Ahmad Bhatti
> +254726488311<tel:+254%20726%20488311>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:43 AM +0300, "Brian Muhia via kictanet" <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
>
> This is only to be applied to people trying to do contract jobs for the
> government, right?
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:27 AM WANGARI KABIRU via kictanet <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
> Blessed Thursday!
>
> Might the sector be getting its shape?
>
> Private schooling started as an innovative approach to education - now we
> even have more innovative home schooling and best practice approaches.
> Healthcare etc
>
> Who has helped to weed out quacks proactively in most instances - it is
> the industry associations working with the governments. An angle to borrow
> from.
>
> "....He said the authority will in the next couple of weeks launch ICT
> standards where every professional in the field seeking to serve public
> service must comply.
> ?One of the things which we are doing very soon in the next couple of
> weeks, is that we shall be launching ICT standard, these are ICT national
> standards and we plan on having them effective from first of January and
> based on that vendors will have to comply with the standards,? said the
> CEO, adding that those who will not comply to the standards will be
> blacklisted..."
>
> How might the players engage in the discourse to give it shape while keep
> its jelly-nature?
>
> Be blessed.
>
> Regards/Wangari
>
> ---
> Pray God Bless. 2013Wangari circa - "Being of the Light, We are Restored
> Through Faith in Mind, Body and Spirit; We Manifest The Kingdom of God on
> Earth".
>
>
> On Thursday, 1 December 2016, 8:43, Ahmed Mohamed Maawy via kictanet <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke<mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
> mailman/options/kictanet/dmuthoni%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
> ...
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------
>  This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered
> safely by Mimecast.
>  For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/
> attachments/20161202/189821d2/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of kictanet Digest, Vol 115, Issue 57
> *****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20161202/36884149/attachment.htm>


More information about the KICTANet mailing list