[kictanet] Public Consultations on the Development of a National Addressing System (NAS) framework
Mwendwa Kivuva
Kivuva at transworldafrica.com
Tue Apr 26 10:31:43 EAT 2016
On 26 April 2016 at 10:26, Tony White via kictanet <
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 5.1. Some of the features the NAS System should have include the
> following;
> ...
> ...
> j) The system places the responsibility of address display to the
> citizen and charges a fee, which reduces the need for huge cost
> outlay.
>
...
> ...
> m) Counties will raise revenue from property numbering and addressing fees.
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
So this means the residents of Nairobi and elsewhere will pay the county
government to have numbers displayed in their gates? Probably an annual fee?
>
>
> As usual, madness prevails!
>
> How can you charge for having an 'address' - which, presumably, will
> be mandatory?
>
______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
twitter.com/lordmwesh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20160426/a7ae626f/attachment.htm>
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list