[kictanet] DotConnectAfrica's response to dot Africa Reserve Name Policy Discussions (Introduction)

[Gideon]

McTim,

>  But they did, it is regarding lack of governmental support. This was
>> clearly raised in Beijing.
>>
> McTim,  thanks and yes I understand the reasons were not publicly
published, but I wanted to clarify further that the deliberations inside
GAC as we have confirmed were evident of the support issue.

Regards
Gideon


>
>
> It may have been raised in Beijing, but the Beijing Communique only says:
>
> "IV. GAC Advice to the ICANN Board2
> 1. New gTLDs
> a. GAC Objections to Specific Applications
> i. The GAC Advises the ICANN Board that:
> i. The GAC has reached consensus onGAC Objection Advice according
> to Module 3.1 part I of the Applicant Guidebook on the following
> applications:
> 3
> .
> 1. The application for .africa (Application number 1-1165-42560)
> 2. The application for .gcc (application number: 1-1936-2101)"
>
>
> That was what I was referring to in my previous post.
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
> indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20130705/ce091327/attachment.htm>