[kictanet] 3 Media houses protest Majanja's Digital Migration Ruling
Walubengo J
jwalu at yahoo.com
Mon Dec 30 10:35:40 EAT 2013
@Ngigi, @Ndemo,
this is the hard-talk that keeps me coming back to KICTAnet :-)
my 2pence is that this war is NOT about digital migration - given that both Government and Media houses agree on that. This was is about who controls the digital signal distribution (licence). Its sort of a chicken and egg problem in that the current digital signal distributors (Signet/PANG) dont have "local" content but have the license to distribute. While the current local content guys (media houses) have the content but lack the digital license to distribute.
A license without content is like a gun without a bullet. A bullet without a gun is of no use either. Who will blink first?
Afrosinema continues :-)
walu.
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 12/30/13, Ngigi Waithaka <ngigi at at.co.ke> wrote:
Subject: Re: [kictanet] 3 Media houses protest Majanja's Digital Migration Ruling
To: jwalu at yahoo.com
Cc: "Consumer and Public Affairs" <cpa at cck.go.ke>, "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Date: Monday, December 30, 2013, 9:32 AM
Daktari,
Having looked at your comments, I would want
to think the comparisons you have picked do not quite cut
it.
Fact, we currently have firms in Kenya apart
from KBC who have a reliable analogue transmission network
across the entire country and so far they have delivered on
this.
To upgrade this transmission network to pump
out Digital Signals, instead of the Analogue is not rocket
science. It can be done easily and would reuse such existing
infrastrucure such as sites, masts, backup generators,
logistics & security etc
To say or assume that these firms could *not*
provide a Digital Solution if asked to, simply does not
add up. Not when they have 60% of what you need and the
remaining parts e.g multiplexers, antennas are off-the-shelf
parts.
Second, to compare these firms to Mobitelea is
really pushing it. Here you are talking of firms that have
demostrated capacity in building & maintaining their own
infrastructure and that are employing Kenyans to maintain
and operate them.
These are not politically connected individuals
who have nothing else to offer apart from access to high
places.
These are solid Kenyan companies.
Thirdly, this case cannot even be remotely
compared to KPTC where competition had to be introduced to
kickstart our Telco Sector. In this case you are actually
consolidating the *infrastructure* industry to a single
vendor not liberating it.
You are going from more than 10 firms each with
own transmission infrastrucure to two firms, one of which
(KBC) as you have correctly indicated doesn't cut it.
So infact you have consolidated our entire
transmission industry into a single company, and then given
that to the Chinese!
If there is something that smells Mobitelea.
That is it!
Fourth you mention the China Telcom partnering
up with Apple iPhone as an example of how countries
sometimes partner with firms outside their own. But you fail
to mention they never went to Apple as their first point of
call. They first partnered up with Lenovo, HTC, Huawei
(solid Chines firms) before the call to Cupertino was
made.
You take care of your own first before you go
taking care of others. That's what smart countries &
leadership does.
Lastly, please let us differentiate btn the
Infrastructure issues and Digital Migration issues.
On Digital migration, we are headed there and
there is not much support for Media firms on this. Wapende
wasipende!
However, on denying them the deal to build
the Digital Infrastructure is very questionable and on the
very least points to a certain 'Mobitelea' type
deal, exactly what you say we ought to have avoided.
But then again, This is Kenya. Where the
impossible happens.
Waithaka Ngigi
Alliance Technologies
Nairobi, Kenya
www.A1.io
On 29 Dec 2013 21:36,
"Bitange Ndemo" <bitange at jambo.co.ke>
wrote:
Kivuva,
Iam a supporter of building local capacities but whichever
way CCK would
have given out the license, there was going to be criticism.
CCK wanted
someone capable of putting up infrastructure after we
discovered Signet
was taking too long and Government did not have money. The
financial bid
for all the local firms did not measure up to what CCK had
requested.
You realize CCK has gone through this journey before and
were hit hard
when policy requirement needed 70 percent local
participation, we got
Mobitelea. Every policy pronouncement has some wheeler
dealers behind
singing patriotism. World over what is needed is the
ability to provide
the solution. You read the other day that China Telcom was
partnering
with I-Phone yet China is the greatest producer of mobile
handsets. There
comes a time when we must accept partnerships that will help
us build
capacity. We provided that opportunity in Signet but it
was declined.
When you focus on coverage to offer essential service, you
look at
capability as demonstrated in the financials.
For many years we protected KPTC as a critical
infrastructure but what we
ended up with was poverty en masse. Our people would not
afford
telephony. Ever since we liberalized the communications
sector, it is now
contributing more than 5 percent to the economy up from zero
percent. It
is dangerous to focus on one aspect of migration
infrastructure. If each
of the broadcaster is given multiplexing ability, they will
hoard the
spectrum and shut out new entrants just when the creative
economy is
trying to pick up. The current Media is simply trying to
protect its own
interests considering the fact that we have new hard working
Kenyans
entering the broadcast arena. Why would we be supportive of
oligopolistic
practices when the industry is opening up to more players?
Court or no court Migration will take place and new business
models will
emerge. This is where we need to focus our attention.
The delaying
tactics you are seeing is to disenfranchise more than 100
new broadcasters
that are born and bred in this country. I said before and
would state
here that not even Signet or PANG would build a sustainable
business model
without serious content aggregation strategy considering the
fact that
technology changes every 3 years.
Ndemo.
> Ali, I'm afraid many listers are not getting your
argument, that of
> auctioning our critical resources to foreigners.
>
> Many of us have been dragged into taking sides either
for the
> government (CCK), or the local media houses. If we
divorce them from
> this debate, maybe we will be more objective.
>
> Let me digress, we have enough coal in Kitui to setup a
powerplant
> that can propell Kenya to vision 2030 and stop relying
on poor
> rainfall and other unreliable renewable energy like
geothermal. But
> what did we do with the coal? We auctioned it to the
Chinese "who need
> the power more than us." That is the same thing
happening to our
> spectrum resources.
>
> Forget about procurement laws and let's think about
economics that
> will build the country without taking sides. Is it
better to give the
> frequency distribution to a local firm, and keep local
dollars local,
> or is it better to have that capital flight to China?
We should even
> give the third licence FREE to a consortium of local
firms than
> auction it for a Billion dollars to a foreigner.
>
> Are we a nation that has lost national pride?
>
> Remember CCK cannot have an objective stand on this
since Wambua has
> to respond with the official government position, and I
cannot fault
> him for that. Only civil society can take the high
moral ground and do
> what is good for Kenya. Advocate for our critical
resources, airwaves,
> minerals, tourism, ... to be controlled by locals.
>
> Dr. Ndemo is the economist on the list. Can he teach us
why developed
> economies work so hard to support their industries,
while Kenya works
> extra hard to support foreign economies? What are the
repercussions on
> future generations?
>
> Anybody who cannot get this argument is beyond
uncolonization.
>
> --
> ______________________
> Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
> twitter.com/lordmwesh
> kenya.or.ke | The Kenya we
know
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/bitange%40jambo.co.ke
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a
multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in
ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for
reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled
growth and
> development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of
acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect
people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or
personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ngigi%40at.co.ke
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a
multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions
interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The
network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth
and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect
people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't
flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam,
do not market your wares or qualifications.
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a
multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions
interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The
network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth
and development.
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect
people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame
or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do
not market your wares or qualifications.
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list