[kictanet] kictanet Digest, Vol 60, Issue 21
Angela Nganga- Mumo
anganga at orange-tkl.co.ke
Fri May 4 01:37:00 EAT 2012
----- Original Message -----
From: kictanet-request at lists.kictanet.or.ke [mailto:kictanet-request at lists.kictanet.or.ke]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:37 PM
To: Angela Nganga- Mumo
Subject: kictanet Digest, Vol 60, Issue 21
Send kictanet mailing list submissions to
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
kictanet-request at lists.kictanet.or.ke
You can reach the person managing the list at
kictanet-owner at lists.kictanet.or.ke
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kictanet digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: #140Friday Policy Paper Draft - collaboration Edition
(Brian Munyao Longwe)
2. Re: #140Friday Policy Paper Draft - collaboration Edition (Kivuva)
3. The real challenge of corporate governance: reinvent the
board of directors! (Grace Githaiga)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:57:36 +0300
From: Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe at gmail.com>
To: Muchiri Nyaggah <muchiri at semacraft.com>
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Subject: Re: [kictanet] #140Friday Policy Paper Draft - collaboration
Edition
Message-ID:
<CAHSdPfZjdySM2YmZt=5aTuZ4E_6XoKiZAD9AR75-NdYqQzV4bA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Oops - seems like team members who can updated have to be added - please
send me an offlist email if you are interested so that I can add you.
Thanks for pointing this out Muchiri!
Best regards,
Brian
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe at gmail.com>wrote:
> Seems that the free version of document collaboration on Sync.in had a
> limit of 8 simultaneous users - which restricted some from posting their
> comments.
>
> I have found another site that uses the same Etherpad technology (which is
> a Google Code project) and allows unlimited team members to collaborate.
>
> I have transferred the content to date to the "new" tool. To participate,
> go to http://140friday.titanpad.com - you will be asked to create an
> account, which will then allow you to login and work on the document.
>
> Apologies for the changes - no goalposts are being moved - looking forward
> to your comments/input.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brian
>
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Muchiri Nyaggah <muchiri at semacraft.com>wrote:
>
>> Brian,
>>
>> Many thanks for this.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Muchiri Nyaggah
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It has been a challenge finding an appropriate tool for the
>>> collaboration and coordination of multiple inputs needed on the #140Friday
>>> Policy Paper. We have tried to use Google Docs but that hasn't worked out
>>> very well.
>>>
>>> I have found a lighter, and seemingly more appropriate tool called
>>> Sync.in - please find the current draft at http://sync.in/uQhr7V3IO4(which I am continuing to update with scattered inputs gathered over the
>>> past 6 weeks from here and there).
>>>
>>> Please type in your name in the field on the right so that we can be
>>> able to make attributions when the time comes.
>>>
>>> Let's hope this works!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Brian
>>>
>>>
>>> "Give us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand
>>> for, because unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything."
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> kictanet mailing list
>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>
>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/muchiri%40semacraft.com
>>>
>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>>
>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Brian Munyao Longwe
> e-mail: blongwe at gmail.com
> cell: +254715964281
> blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com
> meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com
>
> "Give us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand
> for, because unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything."
>
>
--
Brian Munyao Longwe
e-mail: blongwe at gmail.com
cell: +254715964281
blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com
meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com
"Give us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand
for, because unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20120503/3a64ee5f/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 16:03:54 +0300
From: Kivuva <Kivuva at transworldafrica.com>
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Subject: Re: [kictanet] #140Friday Policy Paper Draft - collaboration
Edition
Message-ID:
<CAEhPqwrGygNM6QwGRMgX0Gh3ziPMW=uaN57JT4HrrCMDBuUgGA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mr. Longwe,
The effort and research is well noted. At least some of us have learned of
tools like titanpad.com and sync.in.
Regards
10rdmwesh
On 3 May 2012 15:57, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oops - seems like team members who can updated have to be added - please
> send me an offlist email if you are interested so that I can add you.
>
> Thanks for pointing this out Muchiri!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brian
>
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Seems that the free version of document collaboration on Sync.in had a
>> limit of 8 simultaneous users - which restricted some from posting their
>> comments.
>>
>> I have found another site that uses the same Etherpad technology (which
>> is a Google Code project) and allows unlimited team members to collaborate.
>>
>> I have transferred the content to date to the "new" tool. To participate,
>> go to http://140friday.titanpad.com - you will be asked to create an
>> account, which will then allow you to login and work on the document.
>>
>> Apologies for the changes - no goalposts are being moved - looking
>> forward to your comments/input.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Brian
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Muchiri Nyaggah <muchiri at semacraft.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Brian,
>>>
>>> Many thanks for this.
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Muchiri Nyaggah
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Brian Munyao Longwe <blongwe at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> It has been a challenge finding an appropriate tool for the
>>>> collaboration and coordination of multiple inputs needed on the #140Friday
>>>> Policy Paper. We have tried to use Google Docs but that hasn't worked out
>>>> very well.
>>>>
>>>> I have found a lighter, and seemingly more appropriate tool called
>>>> Sync.in - please find the current draft at http://sync.in/uQhr7V3IO4(which I am continuing to update with scattered inputs gathered over the
>>>> past 6 weeks from here and there).
>>>>
>>>> Please type in your name in the field on the right so that we can be
>>>> able to make attributions when the time comes.
>>>>
>>>> Let's hope this works!
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Give us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand
>>>> for, because unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> kictanet mailing list
>>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>>
>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/muchiri%40semacraft.com
>>>>
>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>>>
>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Brian Munyao Longwe
>> e-mail: blongwe at gmail.com
>> cell: +254715964281
>> blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com
>> meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com
>>
>> "Give us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand
>> for, because unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything."
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Brian Munyao Longwe
> e-mail: blongwe at gmail.com
> cell: +254715964281
> blog : http://zinjlog.blogspot.com
> meta-blog: http://mashilingi.blogspot.com
>
> "Give us clear vision that we may know where to stand and what to stand
> for, because unless we stand for something, we shall fall for anything."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/kivuva%40transworldafrica.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
--
______________________
Mwendwa Kivuva
For
Business Development
Transworld Computer Channels
Cel: 0722402248
twitter.com/lordmwesh
www.transworldAfrica.com | Fluent in computing
kenya.or.ke | The Kenya we know
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20120503/fc4cb4d1/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 20:32:35 +0000
From: Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga at hotmail.com>
To: <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Subject: [kictanet] The real challenge of corporate governance:
reinvent the board of directors!
Message-ID: <BAY151-W440BCBB829419FD2335861B42F0 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Listers
After the drama by the NHIF board on television, this story has relevance 8 years later.
RgdsGG
http://www.sunwords.com/2004/03/01/the-real-challenge-of-corporate-governance-reinvent-the-board-of-directors/
The real challenge of corporate
governance: reinvent the board of directors!
by Sunny
Bindra on March 1, 2004 ? 1 comment
in The East African
Share
inShare
The EastAfrican announces a new management
series by Sunny Bindra focusing on the key strategic
issues facing senior executives in the region today.
We start with the first part of a challenging look at
a hallowed institution: the board of directors.
The corporate board is on fire. Across the world, boards
are under unprecedented pressure. Directors of listed
companies are wilting under the glare of the spotlight of
unrelenting public scrutiny. And many business thinkers
now believe that this will be the decade in which we
dramatically redesign the entire concept of the board of
directors.
That is entirely as it should be. The venerable
institution called the board of directors has, in essence,
remained unchanged for many decades. During this period,
the business world has undergone dramatic upheavals.
Information and communications technology has transformed
the way business is done the world over. Globalisation has
provided a quantum leap in the scale of operations of many
corporations ? whilst simultaneously opening them up to
ferocious competition. Customers have used this new
freeing of markets and the remarkable array of consumer
technology now available to them to tremendous effect: to
demand ? and get ? unprecedented choice and value for
money.
In response to this wave of unparalleled change,
businesses have had to uproot their deepest structures.
Organisational design has moved away from functional
?silos? to customer-facing processes. Companies have
learned to define their ?core competencies? and narrow the
scope of operations to doing that which they do
unambiguously well ? and outsourcing the rest. Information
technology has penetrated every facet of the modern
corporation. Reward and incentive systems have been
transformed as the importance of attracting and retaining
the best human talent is recognised in company after
company.
Yet the governance mechanism sitting right at the top of
the corporation ? the board of directors ? has managed, by
and large, to emerge unscathed from this turmoil. The
structure is unchanged: a chairman and a dozen or so
directors, some of whom are executives and others
outsiders. Board composition is pretty much standard:
retired (and tired) CEOs, politicians and professionals,
mostly male. And board processes ? how the board?s work is
done ? are largely as they were: quarterly meetings,
following a rigid agenda; information provided by
management in standard, predictable formats; a
stage-managed annual general meeting where shareholders
are wined and dined and thrown dividends.
Is it really any surprise that this institution is in
crisis? Where management teams have had to learn to be
agile and nimble, boards have managed to remain slow and
unwieldy. Where managers are being forced to rethink the
fundamentals of their businesses every two years or so,
board directors remain steeped in tradition and the
business lore of yesteryear. Where managers rely on
information that changes daily on the computer screens at
their desks, directors receive carefully vetted, sturdily
bound board papers that they have neither the time nor the
inclination to peruse in any depth.
This was a fire waiting to be lit. And once the first
spark came, the flames exploded and spread right across
the globe. We have seen a seemingly endless train of
corporate scandals: from Enron, Tyco and WorldCom in the
USA, to Marconi and Parmalat in Europe, and to the woes of
HIH Insurance, Australia?s biggest insurer. Every time,
the same message is rammed home: traditionally constituted
boards of directors can do very little to prevent massive
failures in management and ethics from taking place
beneath their very feet.
As billions of dollars of shareholders? funds and
employees? dues have gone up in smoke, the reaction
worldwide has undoubtedly been swift and emphatic.
Presidents of nations have intervened, and committees and
task forces have been convened. Grey heads have been asked
to look at the failure in governance and recommend a way
forward. And an apparently inexhaustible procession of
codes of practice has emerged. Many years of weighty
discussions and many acres of rainforest later, a
consensus appears to be emerging with regard to ?best
practice? in corporate governance.
These things are good: a majority of ?independent?
directors and an ever-tighter definition of
?independence?; a separation of the roles of the CEO and
chairman of the board; three core committees (audit,
compensation and governance), all consisting of
independent directors; board approval of company strategy;
formal board evaluation of CEO performance; and, of
course, handsome remuneration for directors for engaging
in these arduous activities.
These things are bad: an overly powerful CEO who has
other directors in his thrall; non-executive directors
with powerful incentives to influence board decisions in
their own financial interest; large boards with
unnecessary directors entrenched by history; boards that
talk too much; boards that talk too little.
So, out of the ferment of recent years, a consensus of
sorts is forming. At its core are a couple of basic
propositions: that boards need to be empowered to act on
behalf of shareholders; and that board incentives need to
be aligned with those of shareholders. The best way to
achieve this, so the consensus thinking goes, is to ensure
that board control is in the hands of directors who are
independent of management. In short, the focus is on
protecting shareholders from the nefarious designs of
managers. And companies are at present falling over
themselves to demonstrate their willingness to adopt these
best-practice codes.
Where are we in East Africa in this whole debate? Let us
start by being quite frank: what does a position as a
director in many of the region?s leading corporations
entail? Firstly, one is generally invited to the board by
one?s friends and allies in the corporate world, usually
to join a particular political camp in that board.
Secondly, one often actively seeks conflicts of interest:
if one is a professional, one tries to sell one?s services
to the company; if one is a politician, one marshals the
company?s resources for personal use, particularly at
election time. Thirdly, one really expects to have very
little to do as a board member: a few tedious meetings
every year followed by a sumptuous lunch; a board retreat
or two at a beach hotel or 5-star lodge; a generally
uneventful AGM where an occasionally troublesome
shareholder livens up proceedings.
Traditionally, local directors in eminent boards tend to
be drawn from one of two sources. First, from the pool of
retired CEOs who made their reputations in the boom years
of the 1970s and 1980s (in Kenya at least), and who bring
grey hairs, a certain fame and a stack of business stories
from the monopolies of yesteryear to the table. Second,
from the pool of politicians and political operatives who
bring the possibility of putting the company on the inside
track with regard to lucrative government procurement, or
who can pick up the telephone to smooth out tricky
problems that the company might face from time to time.
I am generalising deliberately. Of course there are
companies that are very competently governed, and
directors who provide wise independent counsel through
good times and bad. But there are very few. By and large,
we are retaining structures that are totally irrelevant to
the demands of the 21st century. We are appointing
individuals that at best are invisible and at worst are
subtracting value from the corporation. And we are stuck
with information processes with that leave directors
completely in the dark as to what is really happening
within the company.
In East Africa, executives are used to whining about the
state of the region?s infrastructure, about what
additional costs are imposed by insecurity and corruption,
about the inconsistencies of fiscal and monetary policy.
We are less used to taking a hard and honest look at the
very structures and systems by which we manage and govern
ourselves. If we start at the very top, we will see that
the role and operation of the board of directors itself
needs a fundamental overhaul.
East African companies come in all shapes and sizes, from
the large multinational to the small, rapidly growing
trading companies located in the back streets of Nairobi,
Kampala and Dar-es-Salaam. Good corporate governance is
necessary in all of them. The interests of minority
shareholders must be protected at all times, even in small
family-owned companies. Society, too, increasingly expects
responsible behaviour from all corporate entities.
Not-for-profit organisations like schools, hospitals and
NGOs must also account for themselves in a professional
manner. No organisation is exempt from the need to take
governance to a different level.
Given that we are starting from farther back than the
rest of the world, adopting the best-practice codes of
conduct that are sweeping through boards everywhere would
be no bad thing. We certainly need to protect shareholders
from managers who have consistently and systematically
denuded them. We certainly need to embed the idea of the
independent director, in a corporate culture that has yet
to grasp its import. And we certainly need to limit the
often-ridiculous powers we grant to our chief executives.
Yet the opportunity is far greater. We would limit
ourselves severely if we went for wholesale adoption of
codes of practice and then settled back to our cigars and
brandies, our work done. The true frontier of change in
corporate governance is elsewhere. The most enlightened
corporations are looking far beyond best practice. They
are looking at a fundamental redesign of the board of
directors from first principles, a complete overhaul of
structure, composition and processes.
That is where leading East African corporations must
settle their gaze. For a tour of what the reinvented board
of directors might look like, see you here next week.
--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20120503/c5cba0b0/attachment.html>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
End of kictanet Digest, Vol 60, Issue 21
****************************************
#############################################################################################################################################################################
IMPORTANT. This e-mail message and any attachments are strictly confidential and may be protected by law. This message is
intended only for the named recipient(s) above.
If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message.
Any unauthorized view, usage or disclosure of this message is prohibited.
Since e-mail messages may not be reliable, France Telecom Group shall not be liable for any message if modified, changed or falsified.
Additionally the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
#############################################################################################################################################################################
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list