[kictanet] IF CCK CHOOSES TO MONITOR INTERNET TRAFFIC, WILL IT ALSO MANAGE TO BLOCK TORRENTS THAT CONSUME BANDWIDTH?

[Michelle Tongo]

On 1 May 2012 14:30, Michelle Tongo <shivumich89 at gmail.com> wrote:

> @peter:
> thats a good insight.
>
> First and foremost do you think CCk will be able to monitor internet
> traffic? i mean , do they have the resources to do so?
>
> whats your opinion?
>
>
> On 1 May 2012 14:18, Peter Wakaba <peterwakaba at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> first, torrents evolve. Will CCK evolve as fast? I dont think so. ( THEY
>> WILL END UP STUCK WITH EXPENSIVE/OBSOLTE SOFTWARE/ HARDWARE)
>> Second, torrent clients are not generic, so will CCK be able to pin down
>> all the different types? I dont know.
>> Third, in the west they have decided to take down the largest pirates
>> (read TIM dot Com and Newzealand). But even then, with Napster down,
>> Megaupload gone... i still have thousands of peers seeding from every
>> torrent i download.
>>
>> Its only a matter of time before someone else come up with something that
>> makes torrents obsolete. rather than blockading the media owners should be
>> thinking disruptive techonology, something that makes torrents irrelevant.
>>
>> My two cents.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Regards,*
> *Michelle T.*
> *Cell: +254-734-695-532*
> *
> *
>
>


-- 
*Regards,*
*Michelle T.*
*Cell: +254-734-695-532*
*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20120501/24d8e134/attachment.htm>