[kictanet] [Skunkworks] Media Misleading Citizens?-One Man Security?

Thu Mar 22 11:49:40 EAT 2012

@Edwin,

Do you have any idea how the NSIS, for instance, does their work? Some of
the ways they use, like the CIA, might sound unethical, but not necessarily
unconstitutional. Actually, I don't see what is unconstitutional in this
act of policing Cyberspace. If you don't stop Al Qaeda before they bomb
their next target, and if you do by means of cyber policing, which of those
two do you vote for?

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:41, Edwin Onchari <eonchari at lynxbits.com> wrote:

> Just curious like many in this list are-  how come no one from CCK or our
> esteemed usually vocal GoK officials on this list not made any comments on
> this at all? I have this unsettling gut feeling that this has been
> operational for a while now, which then makes it outright unconstitutional!!
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Edwin****
>
> *From:* kictanet-bounces+eonchari=lynxbits.com at lists.kictanet.or.ke[mailto:
> kictanet-bounces+eonchari=lynxbits.com at lists.kictanet.or.ke] *On Behalf
> Of *Harry Delano
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:01 AM
> *To:* Edwin
>
> *Cc:* 'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions'
> *Subject:* Re: [kictanet] [Skunkworks] Media Misleading Citizens?-One Man
> Security?****
>
> ** **
>
> @Wash,****
>
> ** **
>
> Quite an assessment you got, this..****
>
> ** **
>
> However, thisà “ *I want to believe that whoever is going to be in charge
> of the gadgets is not going to be able to act unilaterally*”, might****
>
> not be practically enforceable by oversight bodies, based on one premise:-
> That they haven’t got any scant idea whatsoever on how  the ****
>
> underlying technology will work. You can expect this to also be treated as
> a national security secret, since hackivists/other rogue elements****
>
> can use such info to strike if placed in the public domain.****
>
> ** **
>
> I suppose, what we might need is to learn what the yet-to-be-delivered
> “Great Firewall” can do and not do. For instance, if it’s capabilities****
>
> among others comprise ability to shutdown internet, censorship, or other
> such loopholes as industrial(read business), political espionage,****
>
> then we have need to sound out/lobby (law makers perhaps), to toughen up
> laws against such blatant abuse..****
>
> ** **
>
> Regards,****
>
> Harry****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* kictanet-bounces+harry=comtelsys.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke[mailto:
> kictanet-bounces+harry=comtelsys.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke] *On Behalf
> Of *Odhiambo Washington
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:26 AM
> *To:* harry at comtelsys.co.ke
> *Cc:* KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
> *Subject:* Re: [kictanet] [Skunkworks] Media Misleading Citizens?-One Man
> Security?****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 18:49, Walubengo J <jwalu at yahoo.com> wrote:****
>
> --- On *Wed, 3/21/12, Moses Muya <mouzmuyer at gmail.com>* wrote
> >snip
> The only question that comes to mind is whether the Government has the
> right legal backing to do this.
> >snip****
>
> ** **
>
> [snip]
>  ****
>
>
> Lets for a moment imagine that there is legal backing and ALL Operators
> are compelled to install this gadget.  Would we then claim to be
> electronically safer? Research shows that over 75% of electronic
> fraud/crime originates and is executed internally (like within
> Banks/Organisations) and hence putting gadgets at the Operators level
> presupposes the most of the bad guys are comming in from the "outside".
> Fine you may catch the minotrity thugs (25%) but have not impact on the
> majority internal thugs (the 75%...)****
>
>
> @Walu,
>
> We'd be electronically safer, yes. We are sniffing "Internet" and
> "internet" traffic. "Internet" here stands for Kenya<->Worldwide traffic
> while "internet" stands for Kenya<->Kenya (can be via KIXP of just within
> the operators network) traffic. For all intents and purposes, I believe the
> system is not supposed extend beyond those two scenarios, like sniffing
> traffic within a bank's system. You pushed it beyond the mandate of CCK by
> introducing traffic within RFC1918 confines. I believe the gadget applies
> only to those organizations which offer cyberspace based services to the
> public.
>  ****
>
>
> A secondary but equally important point, is what would stop the Director
> General (my good friend Wangusi) to use the very same equipment to block
> internet traffic into and out of  the Kenyan space? Especially if Kenyans
> are trying to do the equivalent of the Arab uprising on
> Twitter/FB/etc...which is likely considering our politics is not really
> improving (but I digress)****
>
>
> This is not an issue. Even before the introduction of the gadget, I
> believe the govt has a way of asking an provider licensed under CCK to shut
> down their services, in the guise of national security, or be forced shut!
> You remember KTN case and the "if you rattle a snake"? God forbid we don't
> have such level of dictatorship in KE.
>  ****
>
>
> Am not purely against security gadgets being installed.  Am against a
> framework that puts one man or woman in charge of these gadgets. Even our
> new constitution puts the Police and Security Intelligence bosses under
> Parliament (210 MPs?)****
>
>
> Let ms also go ahead and say that you seem to have made a great assumption
> on that. It's not possible that only one (wo)man is going to be in charge
> of these gadgets. The security agencies are mostl likely the ones who are
> going to be going over the data collected with a toothcomb and magnifying
> glass, but remember there is a Police Oversight Authority and the
> Parliamentary Committee on Security who hold sway over the security
> agencies... I want to believe that whoever is going to be in charge of the
> gadgets is not going to be able to act unilaterally.
>
>  ****
>
>
> If we are not carefull we may be basically putting Kenya back to the days
> of one-man-show. Remember one broadcasting station - Voice of Kenya?
> remember KPT&C - the days of JamboNet? Same thing here on the offing - if
> we are to believe what has been published in the press (and why not, no one
> from CCK has protested as  being misquoted) .****
>
>
> Hehe... I think you presented an Academic paper, Walu. We have a new
> constitution which gives the people a lot more power than Moi ever
> imagined, lest you forget :-)****
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
> Nairobi,KE
> +254733744121/+254722743223
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler.
> Please consider the environment before printing this email. ****
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4885 - Release Date: 03/21/12*
> ***
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/odhiambo%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>

-- 
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20120322/eb9cbbc4/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 652 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20120322/eb9cbbc4/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 652 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20120322/eb9cbbc4/attachment-0001.png>