[kictanet] Ministry seeks more seats at KENIC
Alice Munyua
alice at apc.org
Thu Aug 16 17:30:51 EAT 2012
Dear Ali and all,
If you recall, KICTANet, Drake and KIMA were all invited to serve on the board in
2007, initially as associate members and then admitted as full board
members through a board resolution.
Stakeholders interviewed during the KENIC Institutional assessment
process (April 2012) identified stakeholder's representation as one of
the top 5 issues of concern.
The assessment exercise also found that only 3 of the organisations
represented on the board, (TESPOK, KENET and CCK) had "provided their
organisation's registration documents". In addition, the assessment
noted, "There is a lack of consistency in the documents required of
members and their organisation".
There was an agreement that it is necessary to implement recommendations coming
out of the assessment exercise, among these are recommendations about
board members tenure of office, appointment, retirement, etc. We had
hoped to discuss and finalise (implement) this during the August AGM.
Anyway, P.S Dr. Ndemo's statement on BD: "I think the
right question we need to ask is where the term stakeholder is defined
as only registered firms. The Constitution now demands public
participation, which I assume to mean stakeholders," I agree with him. And at the same time note that who and how many
stakeholders may vary for various organisations as policy, regulatory
and technical environment changes (e.g. several key stakeholders,
normally stay put others may migrate in and out) and as such we must
consider issues such as: Who are the stakeholders? Who is responsible for identifying
them? Processes need to be clearly identified and agreed and
followed. There must be transparency they are important issues for
discussion.
The assessment recommends among other things, definition of "adequate
particulars... after a thorough stakeholder review on importance of
stakeholder, purpose of engagement and expected outcome upon
engagement"
Hope this will be an agenda item for the upcoming AGM and wish KeNIC
all the best.
Best
Alice
On 15/08/2012 04:41, Ali Hussein wrote:
> Listers
>
> I feel that as a former board member I cannot let this news report in
> the Business Daily go unanswered. In the interest of balanced
> reporting allow me to state the following:
>
> More Government involvement I guess is something that had to happen.
> Not sure its necessarily a good thing.
>
> The current board composition beyond what the Business Daily reported
> is that Government has defacto 5 Board seats at KeNIC - 3 from CCK -
> Lucky Waendi (who resigned almost immediately after I did. The
> resignation of Lucky is telling since it came after a month where her
> Directorship was withdrawn by CCK only to be reinstated after the then
> Chairperson of KeNIC, Alice Munyua was mandated by the full board to
> seek audience with the CCK Ag DG to reconsider her withdrawal as she
> provided valuably Company Secretarial duties. Although this slot on
> the Board remains empty, technically it can still be filled). The
> other directors representing CCK at KeNIC are Michael Katundu and the
> Director General. Government is also represented by someone from the
> eGovernment Secretariat. In addition to the new appointment from the
> Ministry of Information & Communication we now have at least
> technically 5 Government Representatives on the Board of KeNIC.
>
> The other board members are from KIMA (Kenya Internet Marketing
> Assiciation) which was represented by Moses Kemibaro who has since
> resigned and not been replaced to date; Drake which I served and
> resigned so that I can be replaced by somebody else from Drake. For
> full disclosure the reason for my resignation are two fold:-
>
> 1. The membership of Drake which is primarily made up of Domain
> Registrars felt that I no longer represented their interests therefore
> I felt that it was incumbent upon me to resign and let fresh blood
> come in.
>
> 2. The board charter (at least up until when I resigned) was clear
> that a board member can only serve two terms and should then be
> replaced. I'm sure this is something that KeNIC isn't fully
> implementing as there are Board Members who have been serving since
> 2002/3. I felt that this may create a positive precedence and allow
> for more transparency in the circulation of board members going forward.
>
> I also believe that there is at least one other board member who we
> are not sure which organization he represents.
>
> My humble opinion is that the issue is mainly one of Corporate
> Governance. When an institution that was primarily formed as a
> Multi-Stakeholder entity becomes embroiled in what seems like
> Schizophrenic behavior you have a situation as we do today. Why do I
> say this? You can't wake up one morning and decide that because one
> Organization isn't registered then it should loose its board seat
> while others whose registrations haven't been completed still retain
> their seats. I'm referring here to Drake & KIMA. It doesn't seat very
> well and smacks of Double Standards.
>
> The issues at KeNIC cannot be wished away ladies & gentlemen. Packing
> it with more directors from Government although will temporarily
> steady the ship moves it away from being a Multi-stakeholder
> organization.
>
> In a posting last month I intimated at the real issues. Let me recap
> here the genesis of the problem as I see it. I by no means have a
> monopoly of ideas on what the real issues are but this is wholly my
> personal opinion and observations during my time as a director at KeNIC.
>
> Firstly there have been mainly two opposing (sometimes 3) sides at the
> Board Level:-
>
> 1. Government Functionaries that would like KeNIC to operate as a
> wholly owned subsidiary of CCK;
>
> 2. Private Sector types (then represented by myself and Moses
> Kemibaro) who would like KeNIC to embrace more private sector ethos;
>
> 3. And Not For Profit types who advocated a middle ground...
>
> With this kind of representation it was both a major strength (when it
> worked) and at the same time a major weakness) since some of us
> sometimes felt that the bureaucracy was stifling the implementation of
> the Strategic Plan. Case in point:- it took the Board more than six
> months to approve the marketing plan!!
>
> There were allegations that one of us at the board level took to
> personally intimidate the staff to the extent of being abusive. These
> allegations were never substantiated but the fact that they were even
> raised is a major issue and an indictment of the board's leadership.
>
> Then there is the issue of the new ICT law that requires KeNIC to be
> licensed by the CCK. I make two observations here:-
>
> 1. Firstly that there has always been suspicion that one of us at the
> board level used machiavelli type manipulation to ensure that the bill
> drafting included a clause that would make KeNIC a licensee of the CCK
> and basically make the principle of Multi-Stakeholderism null and
> void. In fact I can say here with total conviction that this issue at
> some point totally paralysed us at the Board Level and that TESPOK
> (then represented) by Sammy Buruchara was vehemently and violently
> opposed to this clause to the extent that he personally accused some
> board members representing CCK with being behind this to ensure that
> they control KeNIC. Board minutes will clearly attest to this.
>
> 2. Is it good practice to have a Licensor sit at an organization that
> it licenses or is required by law to license? This is the genesis of
> the issue that is facing us today. CCK has 3 seats at KeNIC. It is not
> for me to judge but for the community to do so.. The analogy here is
> whether CCK should then also not have board representation at
> Safaricom and Orange as these two organizations are still partly
> owned by the people of Kenya and are at the same time licensees of CCK.
>
> By the way there is no right or wrong on how a ccTLD is managed. There
> are various ways how countries do this. The link below will provide
> listers with some perspective:
>
> http://www.cctldinfo.com/home.php
>
> The point I am making is that we must decide which way we want KeNIC
> governed as this situation is getting out of hand and intimating that
> there are no issues at KeNIC in my opinion is being intellectually
> dishonest.
>
> At this juncture I commend Dr.Ndemo for moving swiftly to get more
> information at KeNIC by requesting a board seat for the Min of
> Infocom. This will hopefully bring to light the issues at hand and
> probably see KeNIC take its rightful place in the InfoComm space in
> our beloved country.
>
> Interestingly I see parallels in the fight for control of KeNIC and
> what is happening at the global level with the ITRs, the forthcoming
> WCIT in Dubai and the fight for control of ICANN.
>
> Lastly I urge Alice to come forward and also say her piece as the
> report in the Business Daily may not have fully captured the situation.
>
> I remain your servant
>
> Ali Hussein
>
> +254 773/713 601113
>
> Sent from my iPhone®
>
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 1:30 AM, Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga at hotmail.com
> <mailto:ggithaiga at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>> The Ministry of Information and Communications is seeking more seats
>> on the board of the Kenya Network Information Centre (Kenic), to help
>> solve what it says are problems at the domain registration firm.
>>
>> http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate+News/Ministry+seeks+more+seats+on+Internet+firm+board+/-/539550/1478442/-/item/1/-/holrre/-/index.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke <mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>
>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com
>>
>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder
>> platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT
>> policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for
>> reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT
>> enabled growth and development.
>>
>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable
>> behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times
>> and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize,
>> respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alice%40apc.org
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20120816/fb85b36e/attachment.htm>
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list