[kictanet] Dirty IPs

[robert yawe]

Hi,

Diagnostic code: smtp;554-smtpin.accesskenya.com Your access to this mail system 
has been rejected due to the sending MTA's poor reputation. If you believe that 
this failure is in error, please contact the intended recipient via alternate 
means.
  Remote system: dns;smtpin.accesskenya.com 
(TCP|172.18.233.17|49530|196.200.16.4|25) (smtpin.accesskenya.com)

I have been receiving similar messages from multiple ISPs both local and 
international, is Orange/Telkom serious about offering hosting services?

If they cannot deliver service with their current staff count imagine how much 
worse will it be after they have laid off an additional 400.

Regards Robert Yawe
KAY System Technologies Ltd
Phoenix House, 6th Floor
P O Box 55806 Nairobi, 00200
Kenya


Tel: +254722511225, +254202010696




________________________________
From: "Wambua, Christopher" <Wambua at cck.go.ke>
To: robertyawe at yahoo.co.uk
Cc: CPR team <CPRteam at cck.go.ke>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions 
<kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Fri, 6 May, 2011 11:58:16
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Dirty IPs

 
Muchiri,
 
This may be of interest to you.
 
From:kictanet-bounces+wambua=cck.go.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke 
[mailto:kictanet-bounces+wambua=cck.go.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of 
robert yawe
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 11:32 AM
To: Wambua, Christopher
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Dirty IPs
 
Hi,
 
The provider is Orange/Telkom, my target was not CCK that was just an aside on 
who should actually be making sure that this kind of issues are resolved.
 
Regards
 
Robert Yawe
KAY System Technologies Ltd
Phoenix House, 6th Floor
P O Box 55806 Nairobi, 00200
Kenya
Tel: +254722511225, +254202010696
 
 

________________________________
 
From:Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com>
To: robert yawe <robertyawe at yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Fri, 6 May, 2011 10:50:01
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Dirty IPs



On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 09:05, robert yawe <robertyawe at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Hi,
 
The problem is not the IP at my end but the IP of the providers SMTP server, 
they are the only ones who can request for it to be cleared but they are 
unresponsive, I know I have the freedom to move to another provider but does 
that really solve the problem of licensed operators not being monitored.
 
What use is it then to have CCK license providers and then not police them or is 
it that their only objective is revenue collection?  I expect that licensing by 
CCK of a provider is similar to KeBS placing their mark on a product, an 
assurance to the public that the particular organisations products and services 
have been vetted and soon to meet certain set performance levels.
 
I remember all the Hullabaloo about the DG, aren't some of this issues what 
should determine the KPIs for the organisation, its executive and finally the 
board of directors?
 

Robert,

If your target audience was the CCK and the need for them to police the licensed 
providers, then you should have said this earlier:-)

We were focusing on the "general" problem and how you can go about solving the 
problem.
 
Can you please name the ISP in this case please? We've named Safaricom and KDN 
here before, so I don't see why you should keep referring to a nameless 
provider.

-- 
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler.
Please consider the environment before printing this email. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20110512/a2bfafb3/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 652 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20110512/a2bfafb3/attachment.png>