[kictanet] Red Card for the Sheikhs

Tue Apr 27 19:32:48 EAT 2010

Thanks Kirinya for this insightful thought!  However as human beings the change we expect from them may be too much if they are left unguided. Remember, when one does something against the law it is not that the person does not know that the act is not acceptable .... they go ahead and do it .... Some, because of the fear that the law of the land will be on their case shy away.....

My opinion is a two fold approach; Kenyans need to be sensitized to change and that the constitution should also present a change...the change we need.

Regards,    Okech JMMy blog

--- On Mon, 4/26/10, wesley kirinya <kiriinya2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:

From: wesley kirinya <kiriinya2000 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Red Card for the Sheikhs
To: okechjr at yahoo.com
Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Date: Monday, April 26, 2010, 11:30 PM

At the risk of getting OT:

I believe the constitution should be based on facts and not beliefs. If Christians have their own belief on abortion, let them handle it at their own expense and effort in the church, and if the Muslims have their own beliefs on Marriage, divorse, etc, let them handle it...

This 10 mile strip argument should be laid to rest. I doubt Kenyan Muslims would disassociate themselves with the rest of Kenya and move to the 10 mile strip so that they can practise the 'minor' laws (as we are told) in the new constitution.

Current polls show 65%-70% saying Yes. This is not good enough.

One important thing stands out in these arguments. Perhaps Kenyans and not our current Constitution need to change.

o_O

--- On Tue, 4/27/10, Harry Delano <harry at comtelsys.co.ke>
 wrote:

From: Harry Delano <harry at comtelsys.co.ke>
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Red Card for the Sheikhs
To: kiriinya2000 at yahoo.com
Cc: "'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions'" <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
Date: Tuesday, April 27, 2010, 9:14 AM

Dear Emmanuel,

There is a very clear difference between a chief's proclamation - or read, a
"Govt - (which is 
to an extend been set up through popular will)and laws imposed through
religious fundamentalism
under flimsy excuses.

Now, while it's got everything to do with the current constitution ( though
I do not have any
idea under which chapters these proclamations were meted out, I also believe
such moves coming
while we are trying to piece together a new one, might be a signal to things
to come.Infact,it 
could
 mean things could only get worse under the new one.

Governance, through popular will is duty-bound to protect the very basic of
rights - for all..

Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: emmanuel.khisa at kadet.co.ke [mailto:emmanuel.khisa at kadet.co.ke] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:48 AM
To: harry at comtelsys.co.ke
Cc: 'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions'
Subject: Re: [kictanet] Red Card for the Sheikhs

Did I miss some news?

I thought what I happened in North Eastern (Mandera) to be specific was a
decree that even the Kenyan chief's proclaim from time to time in
"Christian" Kenya. When this happens it affects both
 Christian and Muslim
youth alike.

I am bound to be corrected but this is happening not under the new
Constitution but the current one and so my question is what has it got to do
with the new constitution? What has it got to do with the Kadhi's courts or
any of those parts being contested?

I really think that as reasonable and kind Christ followers, we must ask
ourselves, what's Christ do? 

Regards,

Emmanuel
PS: The views expressed here are my own..

>  -------Original Message-------
>  From: Harry Delano <harry at comtelsys.co.ke>
>  To: emmanuel.khisa at kadet.co.ke
>  Cc: 'KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions' <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
>  Subject: Re: [kictanet] Red Card for the Sheikhs
>  Sent: Apr 26 '10 22:26
>  
>  You mean, there is something called Sharia law, in this  country...???
>  
>  Last time I checked, it's the kind of law applied and dictated  by  
> fundamentalists  upon hapless citizenry, with no regard  whatsoever 
> for the very basic of  basic  human rights..
>  
>  So, who is fooling who..?  Next thing, internet will be  outlawed in 
> that  section  of the nation. Who knows where next. And this is at a 
> time we  working to  open up space and bridge the national divide. 
> Time to smell  coffee...
>  
>  Harry
>  
>  
> 
 --------------------
>  FROM:  kictanet-bounces+harry=comtelsys.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>  [mailto:kictanet-bounces+harry=comtelsys.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke] 
> ON  BEHALF OF S.Murigi Muraya
>  SENT: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 1:09  AM
>  TO: harry at comtelsys.co.ke
>  CC: KICTAnet ICT Policy  Discussions
>  SUBJECT: Re: [kictanet] Red Card for the  Sheikhs
>  
>  
>  Please note Article 24 Subsection 4 of our soon to be new  
> constitution  limits how the Bill of Rights may apply to
 the one 
> religion the  Kenyan  state is funding with the approval of Kenyans who
vote YES!
>  
>  Of  course the Kenyan media is too busy slandering Churches to point 
> this  out.
>  
>  
>  On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Wainaina Mungai <[LINK:
>  mailto:wainaina at madeinkenya.org] wainaina at madeinkenya.org>  wrote:
>  The recent move by Muslim Sheikhs to enforce Sharia Law,   outlaw DSTV,
>  video dens & related activities in Mandera could not have   come at a
>  more unfortunate time. The support they have received from   SUPREM
>  (Supreme Council of Kenya
 Muslims) further complicates the debate   on
>  the "continued" inclusion of Kadhi Courts in our   Constitution.
>  
>  Now that the SUPKEM has proved to support such apparent   'treason' in
>  my secular nation,  President Kibaki and Prime Minister   Odinga must
>  also commit to ensuring that religion and religious courts are   omitted
>  from the new constitution. That is the pact they must sign with the   NO
>  campaign if a YES vote is to sail through without question.   No
>  religion, especially fundamentalist Islam, should enjoy the   privileges
>  of my hard-earned taxes to propagate religious activities that   may
>  disintegrate into such treasonable actions as by the Sheikhs.
> 

>  My   vote would easily change to a resounding "NO" unless I am assured
>  by the   Constitution that no Sheikh or Buddist monk, Hindu priest or
>  Christian   cleric will get away with the absurd audacity of attempting
>  to determine   where I watch my Supersport matches, what I drink as I do
>  so; where and   what I can smoke or drink in an independent secular
>  KENYA.
>  
>  No   religion should 'get it twisted' on its place in secular Kenya and
>  no   loopholes should allow Sheikhs or SUPKEM to get away with such
>  treasonable   actions.
>  
>  Regards,
>  Wainaina
>  
>  --
>  Sent from my mobile   device
>  
> 
 Wainaina Mungai
>  -----
>  [LINK: http://www.bungesms.com] http://www.bungesms.com
>  [LINK: http://www.madeinkenya.org] http://www.madeinkenya.org
>  [LINK: http://www.wainainamungai.com] http://www.wainainamungai.com
>  
>  Thousands of candles   can be lighted from a single candle, and the life
>  of the candle will not be   shortened. Happiness never decreases by
>  being shared. ~   Buddha~
>  
>  _______________________________________________
> 
 kictanet   mailing list
>  [LINK: mailto:kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke] 
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>  [LINK: http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet]
>  http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>  
>  This   message was sent to: [LINK: mailto:murigi.muraya at gmail.com]
>  murigi.muraya at gmail.com
>  Unsubscribe   or change your options at [LINK:
>  
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/murigi.muraya%40g
> mail.com]  
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/murigi.muraya%40g
> mail.com
>  
>  
>  --------------------
>  _______________________________________________
>  kictanet mailing list
>  [LINK: compose.php?to=kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke]
>  kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>  [LINK: http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet]
>  http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>  
>  This message was sent to: [LINK:
>  compose.php?to=emmanuel.khisa at kadet.co.ke] emmanuel.khisa at kadet.co.ke  
> Unsubscribe or change your options at [LINK:
>  
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emmanuel.khisa%40
> kadet.co.ke]  
>
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emmanuel.khisa%40kadet.
co.ke

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: kiriinya2000 at yahoo.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/kiriinya2000%40yahoo.com

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
kictanet mailing list
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

This message was sent to: okechjr at yahoo.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/okechjr%40yahoo.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20100427/db5861e0/attachment.htm>