[kictanet] Solving Flareups Nole Prosequi

Sat Oct 11 15:18:02 EAT 2008

PS Ndemo's persistent interference with and ignorance of court 
rulings and proceedings that involve the ICT sector are not the 
only issues that have been raised.
http://rapidshare.com/files/152947988/final_court_ruling.pdf

 "We are not going to be held at ransom by court cases"  
                     - PS Ndemo, vowing to disrespect the Judiciary
                       The Standard, February 21 2006
                      "Telecom Sector Braces for More Radical 
Changes"

We will not be silenced, not through cowardly anonymous threats, 
bribes, phone tapping or retrogressive acts so that we become the 
proverbial ostrich that buries its head in the sand to pretend that 
it cannot see the dangerous lion that's next to it. 

It is rather foolish and retrogressive to pretend that PS Ndemo's 
arbitrary policies, the same ill conceived policies that deter 
local investors from entering the ICT sector and put foreigners 
ahead and which retrogress the efforts of indigenous Kenyans are 
good for the country, the same interferences that deter the 
judiciary  from independently carrying out its work in disputes 
involving the ICT sector. 

Right things cannot take place at the right place when PS Ndemo is 
busy trampling binding and final court rulings at the behest of 
vested interests and turning around to mislead the ICT fraternity 
that cases that have been long concluded in the Government's favour 
are still ongoing! That is what one calls retrogressive!

Peterson

On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:33:09 +0000 Barrack Otieno 
<otieno.barrack at gmail.com> wrote:
>Better still, let court battles be fought in courts, we are 
>talking
>about doing the right thing at the right place Bill. This kind of
>debate does'nt add any value to the ICT sector let alone the list. 
>At
>best, it is retrogressive
>Regards
>
>On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Gakuru Alex
><alexgakuru.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Bill,
>>
>> I repeat, if the only contributions one ever makes are anti-
>consumer
>> mailing list objectives, principles, and values. Negative to the
>> extent that they distractive and  destructive hard-won gains and 
>long
>> established list engagement principles and
>> framework. Outbursts that cost the list humble and loyal 
>subscribers.
>>
>> We have not build what we have today easily and shall not allow
>> *anyone* to use it as platform to advance unclear private 
>interests.
>>
>> I promise you I will suspend (and if need be unsubscribe) such 
>an
>> individual very fast and without a flinch. The decision or 
>action and
>> the necessitating circumstances are communicated openly to avoid 
>your
>> alluded  "officially instigated" fears. This also removes gaps 
>for
>> credibility tarnishing - we have losts of experience in that 
>area...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Bill Kagai 
><billkagai at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Gakuru Alex 
><alexgakuru.lists at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hustler,
>>>> Therefore, my openly announced decision to suspend discussants 
>was
>>>> based on this line of though/argument. I am not sorry for it 
>and
>>>> re-state nor have the stomach to allow *any such distractions* 
>to come
>>>> in the way of diverting valued "information consumers" 
>attention view
>>>> and best-interests pursuit.
>>>
>>> Alex,
>>> This statement coming from a self confessed consumer rights 
>advocate does
>>> indeed catch my attention. It is dictatorial and akin to 
>'playing god' and
>>> gagging flow/freedom of information.
>>>
>>> If u allow me to suggest a good read, pls re-visit the Akiwumi 
>Report and
>>> you will realise that this attitude of fearing the truth and 
>solving
>>> problems has been a fundamental impediment to our development. 
>Thats why I
>>> laud how Daktari boldly clarified his position (whether we 
>agree with it or
>>> not) rather than taking the route earlier suggested by 
>many...that this is
>>> not the forum nor the channel to discuss a key ICT issue.
>>>
>>> Fear of/for truth/information made the old 'Special Branch' 
>infamous, but
>>> today we look at Nyati and Nyayo Houses with mixed relic 
>reflections. I
>>> mean...if we see the Director General of NSIS appearing in 
>public inquiries
>>> such as Okemo's and Waki's to help in establishing truth, how 
>can some ICT
>>> leaders in this list drag us back to information gagging and 
>side-stepping
>>> issues in the pretext of lacking mandate??
>>>
>>> Its food for thought...I can go on and on....
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> kictanet mailing list
>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>
>>> This message was sent to: alexgakuru.lists at gmail.com
>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> 
>http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/alexgakuru.lis
>ts%40gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>
>> This message was sent to: otieno.barrack at gmail.com
>> Unsubscribe or change your options at 
>http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otieno.barrack
>%40gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Barrack O. Otieno
>ICWE Africa LTD
>P.o. Box 746
>Nairobi 00100
>Tel:
>+254721325277
>+254726544442
>+254202343960
>www.icwe.co.ke
>http://projectdiscovery.or.ke
>National Bank Building
>Harambee Avenue 12th Floor
>
>_______________________________________________
>kictanet mailing list
>kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
>This message was sent to: mwananchi at hushmail.com
>Unsubscribe or change your options at 
>http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwananchi%40hu
>shmail.com

--
Inventors: Does your idea have potential for millions? Click for info.
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4dkcm4URk7LoeifzUW1781c0yV3E0GOalorO9uM5HDVqRlBg/