[kictanet] Day 3 of 10:-IGF Discussions, Internet Interconnection Charges
Gakuru, Alex
alexgakuru.lists at gmail.com
Thu Aug 14 22:14:38 EAT 2008
Totally agree and as far as I am concerned, current energy situation
should be escalated to "National Emergency" status. My neighbour was
disconnected and wondered why he was charged for such items as "fuel
adjustments" etc on his bill while he was disconnected. Typical
monopoly behavour! Who knows, if liberlised, North Eastern Province
could become a biggest producer of solar electricity.
Power From The Sunbaked Desert - Solar generators may be a hot source
of plentiful electricity
<http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_37/b3950067_mz018.htm>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:58 PM, David Otwoma <otwomad at gmail.com> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> One has to agree with your argument.
>
> Remember when mobiles were costing above 200k shs a set. Then the
> regulatory environment allowed more than one player and a plethora of
> sets. We now have 3 shs a minute calls and sets not above 1000 shs.
> When more players roll out the 11 pm to 6 am free calls will go to
> free calls on weekends and public holidays.
>
> As for ISP, when even GSM (Zain has a 2,995 shs unlimited service
> while Safaricom has 300 MB bundle for 999 shs) have joined the earlier
> players (dial as in Telecom, Popote etc. wireless as in butterfly,
> iBurst etc. and the conventionals), the trend has been lower costs
> with better quality as the consumer has many choices.
>
> Sectors that support ICT like energy are the let downs as they are yet
> to liberalize i.e. Kengen has no serious competitors and KPLC is still
> a monopoly giving many Kenyans a raw deal. Those escalating energy
> costs are reducing the impacts that would have been felt by growth in
> ICT.
>
> David
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Gakuru, Alex
> <alexgakuru.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Michuki,
>>
>> This is not true of the market place dynamics. Also equating
>> "cheap/affordability with very poor QoS" invites monopoly. Earlier we
>> were told monopolies gave us expensive poor services and we had no
>> choice but to use their services thus calls to liberalise the sector
>> and ISP entered. Granted, this led to infamous oligopolies(mobiles)
>> but opened a few more consumer choices. Increased competition ensures
>> consumers keep their options open. I encourage you to read Mike
>> Jensen's contribution at last year's IGF.
>> <http://www.intgovforum.org/Rio_Meeting/IGF2-Access-13NOV07.txt>
>>
>> Therefore, I strongly object to your statement and instead call for
>> ever increased competition (see: "his consumer group is working to
>> assure that the people of Kenya gain access to affordable, reliable
>> networked communications from competitive carriers."
>> <http://www.elon.edu/e-web/predictions/igf_interviews_2007.xhtml>)
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Michuki Mwangi <michuki at swiftkenya.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Gakuru, Alex wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For clarity's sake..
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Michuki Mwangi
>>>>>
>>>>> Well this is a clear demonstration of the frustrations that service
>>>>> providers are going through as a result of the competition.
>>>>
>>>> Is competition a good or a bad thing? And for whom?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Its good and bad for the consumer - they gets cheap/affordable services with
>>> very poor QoS.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>
>> This message was sent to: otwomad at gmail.com
>> Unsubscribe or change your options at http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otwomad%40gmail.com
>>
>
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list