[Kictanet] Re: Duopoly by Mobile Service Providers

[Alex Gakuru]

I have a wild idea! What do you think of it?

a) Ownership (shareholding) dictates corporate agenda, local ownership
locally benefits or burdens (converse is also true)
b) GSM Technology is not new, where can it be purchased?
c) Capital Markets Authority grants NSE a special listing for a local public
GSM company.
d) We buy this company's shares
e) We use "our" company's network
f)  Current duopolies become competition receptive
g) Prices come down, super profits vanish!
h) Consumers are happy
i)  MDGs targets become clearer.

Wild I guess?

Regards,

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Jensen" <mikejensen at eircom.net>
To: "KIPlist" <kiplist-cl at lyris.idrc.ca>
Cc: <kictanet at kictanet.or.ke>
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 4:03 PM
Subject: [Kictanet] Re: Duopoly by Mobile Service Providers


> On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 08:40 +0300, John Walubengo wrote:
> > A 3rd Mobile Service Provider is likely to destroy un-written, cartel
agreements that the current service providers are conviniently enjoying.
> Not necessarily - the entrance of the 3rd mobile operator in South
> Africa did nothing to change prices or service levels...perhaps a 4th
> might help:-/
> mike
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at kictanet.or.ke
> http://kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>