<html>
<head>
<meta name="generator" content="Windows Mail 17.5.9600.20911">
<style type="text/css"><!--html { font-family: "Color Emoji", "Calibri", "Segoe UI", "Meiryo", "Microsoft YaHei UI", "Microsoft JhengHei UI", "Malgun Gothic", "sans-serif"; }--></style><style data-externalstyle="true"><!--
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
}
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst,
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle,
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
line-height:115%;
}
--></style></head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div data-externalstyle="false" dir="ltr" style="font-family: 'Calibri', 'Segoe UI', 'Meiryo', 'Microsoft YaHei UI', 'Microsoft JhengHei UI', 'Malgun Gothic', 'sans-serif';font-size:12pt;"><div>ISO 27001 was actually in the performance contracts of state corporations a few years back. It used to be the next step after ISO 9001 certification requirements in the performance contract.</div><div><br></div><div>Also IT departments of organizations that are ISO 9001 (QMS) certified are audited using ISO 27001 controls. </div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Alex</div><div><br></div><div data-signatureblock="true"><div><br></div><div>Sent from Windows Mail</div><div><br></div></div><div style="padding-top: 5px; border-top-color: rgb(229, 229, 229); border-top-width: 1px; border-top-style: solid;"><div><font face=" 'Calibri', 'Segoe UI', 'Meiryo', 'Microsoft YaHei UI', 'Microsoft JhengHei UI', 'Malgun Gothic', 'sans-serif'" style='line-height: 15pt; letter-spacing: 0.02em; font-family: "Calibri", "Segoe UI", "Meiryo", "Microsoft YaHei UI", "Microsoft JhengHei UI", "Malgun Gothic", "sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;'><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke" target="_parent">KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions</a><br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 19, 2017 3:20 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:awatila@yahoo.co.uk" target="_parent">'Watila Alex - Current'</a><br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:otieno.barrack@gmail.com" target="_parent">Barrack Otieno</a></font></div></div><div><br></div><div dir=""><div id="readingPaneBodyContent">We also have numerous Standards such as the ISO 27000 series available<br>at Kenya Bureau of Standards that address most of the human and<br>security issues at the cost of a crate of milk, so far it appears only<br>the Communications Authority has embraced the same, time for this<br>standards to added to the Perfomance contracting framework.<br><br>Regards<br><br>On 1/19/17, S.M. Muraya via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:<br>> @Walu It should be a KICTA (not Treasury) event (hopefully in Nairobi).<br>><br>> How else do they prove they are an "Authority" in providing Cyber security<br>> and transparency in Government?<br>><br>> SMM<br>><br>> *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one<br>> who takes a city." Prov 16:32*<br>><br>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Walubengo J via kictanet <<br>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:<br>><br>>> @Muritu,<br>>><br>>> ICT Governance Framework?...spot on. The software is innocent. How you<br>>> shape the people, processes and procedures around it so as to have checks<br>>> and balances is what makes or breaks software.<br>>><br>>> This is often quite obvious at the political level i.e Executive,<br>>> Legislature and Judiciary relationships, but rarely understood nor<br>>> practiced within the ICT ecosystem. I alway recommend the COBIT framework<br>>> <http://www.isaca.org/knowledge-center/cobit/pages/overview.aspx> for<br>>> those keen on ICT Governance issues.<br>>><br>>> COBIT - IT Governance Framework - Infor...<br>>> <http://www.isaca.org/knowledge-center/cobit/pages/overview.aspx><br>>><br>>><br>>> @Muraya, organize an IFMIS forum and invite me. Would be glad to give my<br>>> fraction of bitcoins :-)<br>>><br>>> walu.<br>>><br>>><br>>> ------------------------------<br>>> *From:* James Muritu via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br>>> *To:* jwalu@yahoo.com<br>>> *Cc:* James Muritu <james.muritu@gmail.com><br>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2017 12:31 PM<br>>><br>>> *Subject:* Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee<br>>> IFMIS<br>>><br>>> Interesting conversations going on here. In simple terms, what IFIMIS<br>>> lacks is a Governance Framework. The "software component" of an ERP is<br>>> just<br>>> one drop in the ocean. People+Processes+Operating Procedures+Decision<br>>> Rights are the bigger drops. Am currently reviewing a similar system in a<br>>> Kenya based corporation and for almost 2 years, the system had been<br>>> blamed<br>>> for all the wrong reasons. The ultimate results, revealed more loopholes<br>>> outside the actual software.<br>>><br>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:01 PM, waudo siganga via kictanet <<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:<br>>><br>>> Thank Walu. I'll wait fro the coffee...<br>>> W.<br>>><br>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Walubengo J wrote:<br>>><br>>> @Daktari Siganga,<br>>><br>>> I was the ICT Director for our university for 5yrs and managed both the<br>>> University Network & ERP - but I dont say :-)<br>>><br>>> We switch between the classroom and ICT operations like that. So I kinda<br>>> have both the academic and practical view of these things<br>>><br>>> Anyway, you are right in that the IT expert(Superuser) should NOT be a<br>>> normal 'Finance' /'HR'/Procurement/ or other regualr user of the ERP.<br>>> However, the IT guys still assign these roles and privileges to the<br>>> various<br>>> functional users. i.e. they must grant rights to the Finance/HR/ and<br>>> other<br>>> Directors to execute their work within the ERP.<br>>><br>>> Different implementations (company policy) maybe that this is delegated<br>>> to<br>>> the various functional heads who can then subsequently grant<br>>> privileges/access rights down through their departments.<br>>><br>>> But this is NOT ideal since you lose the segregation of duties where you<br>>> want the Functional heads(e.g. Finance Director) to make the<br>>> access-rights<br>>> requests IN WRITING, and have SOMEONE ELSE implement that request.<br>>><br>>> This is the 'control' auditors are looking for when auditing the<br>>> information system later on - in terms of checks and balances. Such a<br>>> control is what leads to the questions like:-<br>>> a) Who within the ERP system has privileges that were not formally<br>>> requested for in writing? Or<br>>> b) Who within the ERP system has more privileges than what was formally<br>>> requested for?<br>>> c) Who within the ERP exists but has no supporting access request from<br>>> the<br>>> Functional head?<br>>> d) etc, etc.<br>>><br>>> Even if the IT expert abused his/her superuser privileges by granting<br>>> themselves some user rights within the Financial module, they will be<br>>> outed<br>>> by the above audit process.<br>>><br>>> Denying the IT expert the ability to grant access rights within the ERP<br>>> and passing the same to the functional heads does not solve the problem<br>>> of<br>>> abuse. The functional heads can simply become the new kingpins. Only<br>>> segregation of duty cures the problem of abuse.<br>>><br>>> But we can meet over coffee and share the pros and cons of the various<br>>> implementations :-)<br>>><br>>> walu.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> ------------------------------<br>>> From: waudo siganga <emailsignet@mailcan.com><br>>> To: Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke ><br>>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 10:36 AM<br>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee IFMIS<br>>><br>>> Hi Walu - I can see from your comments that you have never worked in a<br>>> finance environment. For secure setup there is no way "IT guys must then<br>>> translate x, y & z function into the appropriate access levels for that<br>>> accountant within the system". Simply put a person who is a trained IT<br>>> expert knows too much about how the system works and therefore cannot be<br>>> assigned access administration. The overall person for access admin is a<br>>> "super-user" or "Chief Security Officer"or a title in that direction.<br>>> This<br>>> super user assigns access rights to users, such as ability to add,delete,<br>>> update, edit, view, etc records. To assign these rights in practically<br>>> all<br>>> IT systems the super user must himself have those same rights, otherwise<br>>> he/she cannot assign them to other users. A system where a super-user is<br>>> an<br>>> IT expert is a very weak system. The IT expert should never have ability<br>>> to<br>>> enter a system and change records. If you analyse the IFMIS problem you<br>>> will realise that it is not a problem of IT experts infiltrating the<br>>> system. It is just password misuse by ordinary users. At least I agree<br>>> with<br>>> you on one thing - IT expertise role and password administration must<br>>> never<br>>> be put in the same office. In most banks and finance environments the<br>>> super-user function is undertaken by the CEO or a very senior executive<br>>> who<br>>> is OUTSIDE the IT function.<br>>><br>>> THERE IS NO PROBLEM WITH IFMIS. The users, as is normal in any IT system,<br>>> are the weakest link. It is like having pilots who are busy with<br>>> corruption<br>>> to fly a plane then when the plane crashes we say there was a problem<br>>> with<br>>> the plane.<br>>><br>>> W.<br>>><br>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017, at 02:54 PM, Walubengo J wrote:<br>>><br>>> @Dr Siganga, my comments below:<br>>><br>>> >>1. Hi Walu - I do not agree with you that access administration<br>>> (passwords) is a technical function. In most cases passwords just mimic<br>>> authorization structures that pre-exist in a manual system.<br>>> >>><br>>> Response:Yes and NO.<br>>> Yes passwords and their access levels are controls that mimic the<br>>> authorization levels of the manual system. However, their implementation<br>>> in<br>>> an ideal environment should be segregated. E.g the finance director<br>>> should say in writing: 'I need my accountant to do x, y & z function' .<br>>> The IT guys must then translate x, y & z function into the appropriate<br>>> access levels for that accountant within the system.<br>>><br>>> Finance retains the administrative oversight in terms of triggering the<br>>> password request and profiling the access levels desired. IT retains the<br>>> technical function of implementing the same. Never put these two roles in<br>>> one office. Shida mingi inajiletea.<br>>><br>>> >>2. I also differ with your suggestion that it is the work of technical<br>>> people to enforce, check or review system controls. That should be the<br>>> function of an independent auditor.<br>>> >><br>>> RESPONSE: Yes and NO.<br>>> Yes, independent or external auditors (hopefully Information System<br>>> Auditors) do review the technical controls. But this is often an annual<br>>> exercise. So serious organisation do not wait for a year to be told their<br>>> controls were not effective. They have INTERNAL information system<br>>> auditors<br>>> (who are technical) to continuously monitor/enforce that these IT<br>>> controls<br>>> are in place, working and/or need to be updated. Other organisation may<br>>> allocate this role to the Information Security Officer, either way these<br>>> are ICT technical chaps.<br>>><br>>> walu.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> ------------------------------<br>>> From: waudo siganga <emailsignet@mailcan.com><br>>> To: Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke ><br>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:55 PM<br>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee IFMIS<br>>><br>>> Hi Walu - I do not agree with you that access administration (passwords)<br>>> is a technical function. In most cases passwords just mimic authorization<br>>> structures that pre-exist in a manual system. It is very important that<br>>> the<br>>> access of technical people to a system, especially a financial one, be as<br>>> inhibited as possible. Those who access the system should only be capable<br>>> of doing the functions they would perform in a manual system. To enhance<br>>> security of the system, access administration should be overseen by a<br>>> most<br>>> senior person who is NOT trained to do technical work on the system.<br>>><br>>> I also differ with your suggestion that it is the work of technical<br>>> people<br>>> to enforce, check or review system controls. That should be the function<br>>> of<br>>> an independent auditor.<br>>><br>>> Overall I think there is much misunderstanding about IFMIS. The problem<br>>> is<br>>> not technical; it is administrative. Specifically access administration<br>>> (passwords).<br>>><br>>> W.<br>>><br>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017, at 01:06 PM, Walubengo J via kictanet wrote:<br>>><br>>> Grace B via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke > wrote>>><br>>> Second, the problem with IFMIS, it appears is a lack of commitment to<br>>> simple values such as integrity and prudent stewardship of public funds.<br>>> What guarantee wold we have that ICTA would be different from Treasury?<br>>><br>>> >><br>>> Segregation of duties solves this. Treasury continues being the Process<br>>> owner, but surrenders the Technical leadership of the system/ERP to ICT<br>>> Authority. So if it is a case of passwords and their use, expiry amongst<br>>> other technical issues, we know it is ICT Authority to manage (and take<br>>> blame).<br>>><br>>> It is often a confusing and thin line. The line between Administrative<br>>> and<br>>> Technical authority.<br>>><br>>> But you can look at it in terms of the President's Security detail. The<br>>> President maybe the (Administrative) boss of his security detail, but the<br>>> President can never tell his security detail HOW to guard him or what<br>>> weapons to use or how many guards he needs, where to position them etc.<br>>><br>>> These are TECHNICAL issues that the President cannot and should never<br>>> pretend to be dictating on since they lie squarely within the<br>>> NIS/Inspector<br>>> General domain. The moment NIS start taking technical instructions from<br>>> the<br>>> President, is the moment our security system will collapse.<br>>><br>>> If we get this seperation of authority right, we solve the IFMIS puzzle.<br>>><br>>> walu.<br>>><br>>><br>>> ------------------------------<br>>> From: Grace B via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke ><br>>> To: jwalu@yahoo.com<br>>> Cc: Grace B <nmutungu@gmail.com><br>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:11 AM<br>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee IFMIS<br>>><br>>> Interesting discussion. There are those who would look at IFMIS as a<br>>> public finance management issue as opposed to an ICT one but this is not<br>>> really count when giving management mandate to either Treasury or ICTA as<br>>> long as the objectives of PFM (Article 201 of Katiba) are met.<br>>> One of the issues voiced about IFMIS since devolution/new Constitution<br>>> has<br>>> been the problems experienced by county governments and other independent<br>>> organs eg commissions in accessing funds in a timely manner. (We assume<br>>> that Executive has not had too many problems assessing funds and may have<br>>> indeed been facilitating leakage)<br>>> One issue with transferring the responsibility of maintaining IFMIS to<br>>> ICTA, it seems would be that there could be few differences between ICTA<br>>> and Treasury. First, both are Executive institutions that may support<br>>> devolved and independent structures in line with the soft policy<br>>> direction<br>>> of the government of the day. Second, the problem with IFMIS, it appears<br>>> is<br>>> a lack of commitment to simple values such as integrity and prudent<br>>> stewardship of public funds. What guarantee wold we have that ICTA would<br>>> be<br>>> different from Treasury?<br>>><br>>> Regards<br>>><br>>> 2017-01-18 5:54 GMT+03:00 Ali Hussein via kictanet <<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke >:<br>>><br>>> Barrack<br>>><br>>> We are saying the same thing really.. Let's assume that the ICTA is the<br>>> ICT Department of the Government (which I doubt it is equipped to execute<br>>> that mandate) then 'managing' here really means providing support to the<br>>> system.<br>>><br>>> I think it's time the Government considers the role of Chief Information<br>>> Officer to really manage the strategic thrust of all ICT initiatives<br>>> across<br>>> ministries. The CIO can then be held accountable for overall efficiency<br>>> and<br>>> security of all Government ICT Systems. This CIO needs to report directly<br>>> to the Chief Executive Officer (President) of the country. Now, that<br>>> person<br>>> could be seconded or be a part of the ICTA with a doted line<br>>> responsibility<br>>> to the CS, MOICT...<br>>><br>>> Ultimately the overall responsibility of how well our Government ICT<br>>> Systems work lies squarely on the CEO's desk. Look no further.<br>>><br>>> Ali Hussein<br>>> Principal<br>>> Hussein & Associates<br>>> +254 0713 601113<br>>><br>>> Twitter: @AliHKassim<br>>> Skype: abu-jomo<br>>> LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin. com/in/alihkassim<br>>> <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim><br>>> "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a<br>>> habit." ~ Aristotle<br>>><br>>><br>>> Sent from my iPad<br>>><br>>> On 17 Jan 2017, at 11:27 PM, Barrack Otieno via kictanet <<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke > wrote:<br>>><br>>><br>>> Hi Ali,<br>>><br>>> ERP grew from MRP (Material Resource Planning which was a means of<br>>> planning and allocating resources in Factories. The difference between<br>>> the two is that MRP's were stand alone systems whereas ERP's are<br>>> modular and have more functionality. From an evolution perspective ,<br>>> it would be ideal to manage IFMIS from Ministry of Finance since they<br>>> are the custodians of the treasury and normally allocate resources<br>>> through the budgeting process. From a Project Management perspective,<br>>> it would be ideal to manage IFMIS from ICTA since it is the<br>>> specialized agency meant to manage government technology investments.<br>>><br>>> Regards<br>>><br>>> On 1/17/17, S.M. Muraya via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke ><br>>> wrote:<br>>><br>>> Doubt Treasury economists and accountants are well placed to provide<br>>> Cyber<br>>><br>>> Security :)<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> We need the ICT Authority to configure enterprise wide data protection<br>>><br>>> (limiting theft of passwords & access to IFMIS).<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> In 2016, the UN ranked the UK as # 1 in providing digital services.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> https://publicadministration. un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/<br>>> UN-E-Government-Survey-2016<br>>> <https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2016><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> The Government Digital Service (GDS) is part of their Cabinet Office, not<br>>><br>>> their Treasury.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> https://www.gov.uk/government/ publications/govuk-pay/govuk- pay<br>>> <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/govuk-pay/govuk-pay><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Their Treasury is consulted about the payment system 👆🏾 the GDS<br>>><br>>> continues to build.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> SMM<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one<br>>><br>>> who takes a city." Prov 16:32*<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Ali Hussein <ali@hussein.me.ke> wrote:<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> I fundamentally disagree with this assertion.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> First,y, the role of a CIO is to support the enterprise. I have never<br>>><br>>> heard in my life of an ERP Director. This is just adding a superfluous<br>>><br>>> layer of useless bureaucracy.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> The owner of an ERP is the business with each department taking ownership<br>>><br>>> of their components:-<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> 1. Financials - CFO<br>>><br>>> 2. CRM (Commercial/marketing/sales)<br>>><br>>> 3. Procurement - Procurement which sometimes comes under Finance<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Etc.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> The CIO takes ownership to ensure that the company is well oiled to<br>>><br>>> execute on its mandate. This in my humble opinion goes beyond ERPs and<br>>><br>>> talks to aligning the Technology Strategy with the Business Strategy. For<br>>><br>>> example in the banking sector where increasingly the more savvy banks are<br>>><br>>> taking a 'Platform Thinking' approach. This allows partners to plug into<br>>><br>>> their core technology through APIs to enable them extend capabilities and<br>>><br>>> hence offerings to their customers.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> The role of a CIO has fundamentally changed to speak to the need for<br>>><br>>> using<br>>><br>>> Technology as an accelerator to successful business models.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Secondly, I don't see how the ICT Authority would be better in managing<br>>><br>>> the monster that is IFMIS. Let them first learn the basics of<br>>><br>>> communicating<br>>><br>>> effectively with the community before taking on this elephant in the<br>>><br>>> room.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> *Ali Hussein*<br>>><br>>> *Principal*<br>>><br>>> *Hussein & Associates*<br>>><br>>> +254 0713 601113<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Twitter: @AliHKassim<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Skype: abu-jomo<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/ alihkassim<br>>> <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a<br>>><br>>> habit." ~ Aristotle<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Sent from my iPad<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> On 17 Jan 2017, at 6:42 PM, S.M. Muraya via kictanet <<br>>><br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Interesting comments...<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee IFMIS<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/ blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560-<br>>> <http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560-><br>>><br>>> 3520560-5j04aq/index.html<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>><br>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>><br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>><br>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>><br>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>><br>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>><br>>> mailman/options/kictanet/info% 40alyhussein.com<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>><br>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>><br>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>><br>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>><br>>> development.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>><br>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>><br>>> bandwidth,<br>>><br>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>>><br>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> --<br>>> Barrack O. Otieno<br>>> +254721325277<br>>> +254733206359<br>>> Skype: barrack.otieno<br>>> PGP ID: 0x2611D86A<br>>><br>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>><br>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>> mailman/options/kictanet/info% 40alyhussein.com<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com><br>>><br>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>> development.<br>>><br>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>> bandwidth,<br>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>><br>>><br>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>><br>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>> mailman/options/kictanet/ nmutungu%40gmail.com<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/nmutungu%40gmail.com><br>>><br>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>> development.<br>>><br>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>> bandwidth,<br>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> --<br>>> Grace L.N. Mutung'u<br>>> Skype: gracebomu<br>>> Twitter: @Bomu<br>>><br>>> <http://www. diplointernetgovernance.org/ profile/GraceMutungu<br>>> <http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/profile/GraceMutungu>><br>>><br>>> PGP ID : 0x33A3450F<br>>><br>>><br>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>><br>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>> mailman/options/kictanet/ jwalu%40yahoo.com<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com><br>>><br>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>> development.<br>>><br>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>> bandwidth,<br>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>><br>>><br>>> *______________________________ _________________*<br>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>><br>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>> mailman/options/kictanet/ emailsignet%40mailcan.com<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emailsignet%40mailcan.com><br>>><br>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>> development.<br>>><br>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>> bandwidth,<br>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>><br>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>> mailman/options/kictanet/ james.muritu%40gmail.com<br>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/james.muritu%40gmail.com><br>>><br>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>> development.<br>>><br>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>> bandwidth,<br>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/<br>>><br>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>> mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com<br>>><br>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>> development.<br>>><br>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>> bandwidth,<br>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>><br>>><br>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/<br>>><br>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>> mailman/options/kictanet/murigi.muraya%40gmail.com<br>>><br>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>> development.<br>>><br>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>> bandwidth,<br>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>><br>><br><br><br>-- <br>Barrack O. Otieno<br>+254721325277<br>+254733206359<br>Skype: barrack.otieno<br>PGP ID: 0x2611D86A<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>kictanet mailing list<br>kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/<br><br>Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/awatila%40yahoo.co.uk<br><br>The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.<br><br>KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.</div></div></div>
</body>
</html>