<html>
<head>
<meta name="generator" content="Windows Mail 17.5.9600.20911">
<style type="text/css"><!--html { font-family: "Color Emoji", "Calibri", "Segoe UI", "Meiryo", "Microsoft YaHei UI", "Microsoft JhengHei UI", "Malgun Gothic", "sans-serif"; }--></style><style data-externalstyle="true"><!--
p.MsoListParagraph, li.MsoListParagraph, div.MsoListParagraph {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
}
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpFirst,
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpMiddle,
p.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, li.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast, div.MsoListParagraphCxSpLast {
margin-top:0in;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
line-height:115%;
}
--></style></head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div data-externalstyle="false" dir="ltr" style="font-family: 'Calibri', 'Segoe UI', 'Meiryo', 'Microsoft YaHei UI', 'Microsoft JhengHei UI', 'Malgun Gothic', 'sans-serif';font-size:12pt;"><div>not sure, maybe those still in public service can update us.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,<br></div><div data-signatureblock="true"><div><br></div><div>Sent from Windows Mail</div><div><br></div></div><div style="padding-top: 5px; border-top-color: rgb(229, 229, 229); border-top-width: 1px; border-top-style: solid;"><div><font face=" 'Calibri', 'Segoe UI', 'Meiryo', 'Microsoft YaHei UI', 'Microsoft JhengHei UI', 'Malgun Gothic', 'sans-serif'" style='line-height: 15pt; letter-spacing: 0.02em; font-family: "Calibri", "Segoe UI", "Meiryo", "Microsoft YaHei UI", "Microsoft JhengHei UI", "Malgun Gothic", "sans-serif"; font-size: 12pt;'><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:otieno.barrack@gmail.com" target="_parent">Barrack Otieno</a><br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, January 19, 2017 4:29 PM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:awatila@yahoo.co.uk" target="_parent">'Watila Alex - Current'</a><br><b>Cc:</b> <a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke" target="_parent">KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions</a></font></div></div><div><br></div><div dir=""><div id="readingPaneBodyContent">Hi Alex,<br><br>Interesting, was it dropped? Do you know the reasons why?<br><br>Best Regards<br><br>On 1/19/17, awatila@yahoo.co.uk <awatila@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:<br>> ISO 27001 was actually in the performance contracts of state corporations a<br>> few years back. It used to be the next step after ISO 9001 certification<br>> requirements in the performance contract.<br>><br>><br>> Also IT departments of organizations that are ISO 9001 (QMS) certified are<br>> audited using ISO 27001 controls.<br>><br>><br>> Regards,<br>><br>><br>> Alex<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> Sent from Windows Mail<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> From: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<br>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 3:20 PM<br>> To: 'Watila Alex - Current'<br>> Cc: Barrack Otieno<br>><br>><br>><br>><br>><br>> We also have numerous Standards such as the ISO 27000 series available<br>> at Kenya Bureau of Standards that address most of the human and<br>> security issues at the cost of a crate of milk, so far it appears only<br>> the Communications Authority has embraced the same, time for this<br>> standards to added to the Perfomance contracting framework.<br>><br>> Regards<br>><br>> On 1/19/17, S.M. Muraya via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:<br>>> @Walu It should be a KICTA (not Treasury) event (hopefully in Nairobi).<br>>><br>>> How else do they prove they are an "Authority" in providing Cyber<br>>> security<br>>> and transparency in Government?<br>>><br>>> SMM<br>>><br>>> *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one<br>>> who takes a city." Prov 16:32*<br>>><br>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Walubengo J via kictanet <<br>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:<br>>><br>>>> @Muritu,<br>>>><br>>>> ICT Governance Framework?...spot on. The software is innocent. How you<br>>>> shape the people, processes and procedures around it so as to have<br>>>> checks<br>>>> and balances is what makes or breaks software.<br>>>><br>>>> This is often quite obvious at the political level i.e Executive,<br>>>> Legislature and Judiciary relationships, but rarely understood nor<br>>>> practiced within the ICT ecosystem. I alway recommend the COBIT<br>>>> framework<br>>>> <http://www.isaca.org/knowledge-center/cobit/pages/overview.aspx> for<br>>>> those keen on ICT Governance issues.<br>>>><br>>>> COBIT - IT Governance Framework - Infor...<br>>>> <http://www.isaca.org/knowledge-center/cobit/pages/overview.aspx><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> @Muraya, organize an IFMIS forum and invite me. Would be glad to give my<br>>>> fraction of bitcoins :-)<br>>>><br>>>> walu.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ------------------------------<br>>>> *From:* James Muritu via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br>>>> *To:* jwalu@yahoo.com<br>>>> *Cc:* James Muritu <james.muritu@gmail.com><br>>>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 19, 2017 12:31 PM<br>>>><br>>>> *Subject:* Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee<br>>>> IFMIS<br>>>><br>>>> Interesting conversations going on here. In simple terms, what IFIMIS<br>>>> lacks is a Governance Framework. The "software component" of an ERP is<br>>>> just<br>>>> one drop in the ocean. People+Processes+Operating Procedures+Decision<br>>>> Rights are the bigger drops. Am currently reviewing a similar system in<br>>>> a<br>>>> Kenya based corporation and for almost 2 years, the system had been<br>>>> blamed<br>>>> for all the wrong reasons. The ultimate results, revealed more loopholes<br>>>> outside the actual software.<br>>>><br>>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:01 PM, waudo siganga via kictanet <<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:<br>>>><br>>>> Thank Walu. I'll wait fro the coffee...<br>>>> W.<br>>>><br>>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Walubengo J wrote:<br>>>><br>>>> @Daktari Siganga,<br>>>><br>>>> I was the ICT Director for our university for 5yrs and managed both the<br>>>> University Network & ERP - but I dont say :-)<br>>>><br>>>> We switch between the classroom and ICT operations like that. So I kinda<br>>>> have both the academic and practical view of these things<br>>>><br>>>> Anyway, you are right in that the IT expert(Superuser) should NOT be a<br>>>> normal 'Finance' /'HR'/Procurement/ or other regualr user of the ERP.<br>>>> However, the IT guys still assign these roles and privileges to the<br>>>> various<br>>>> functional users. i.e. they must grant rights to the Finance/HR/ and<br>>>> other<br>>>> Directors to execute their work within the ERP.<br>>>><br>>>> Different implementations (company policy) maybe that this is delegated<br>>>> to<br>>>> the various functional heads who can then subsequently grant<br>>>> privileges/access rights down through their departments.<br>>>><br>>>> But this is NOT ideal since you lose the segregation of duties where you<br>>>> want the Functional heads(e.g. Finance Director) to make the<br>>>> access-rights<br>>>> requests IN WRITING, and have SOMEONE ELSE implement that request.<br>>>><br>>>> This is the 'control' auditors are looking for when auditing the<br>>>> information system later on - in terms of checks and balances. Such a<br>>>> control is what leads to the questions like:-<br>>>> a) Who within the ERP system has privileges that were not formally<br>>>> requested for in writing? Or<br>>>> b) Who within the ERP system has more privileges than what was formally<br>>>> requested for?<br>>>> c) Who within the ERP exists but has no supporting access request from<br>>>> the<br>>>> Functional head?<br>>>> d) etc, etc.<br>>>><br>>>> Even if the IT expert abused his/her superuser privileges by granting<br>>>> themselves some user rights within the Financial module, they will be<br>>>> outed<br>>>> by the above audit process.<br>>>><br>>>> Denying the IT expert the ability to grant access rights within the ERP<br>>>> and passing the same to the functional heads does not solve the problem<br>>>> of<br>>>> abuse. The functional heads can simply become the new kingpins. Only<br>>>> segregation of duty cures the problem of abuse.<br>>>><br>>>> But we can meet over coffee and share the pros and cons of the various<br>>>> implementations :-)<br>>>><br>>>> walu.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ------------------------------<br>>>> From: waudo siganga <emailsignet@mailcan.com><br>>>> To: Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke ><br>>>> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 10:36 AM<br>>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee<br>>>> IFMIS<br>>>><br>>>> Hi Walu - I can see from your comments that you have never worked in a<br>>>> finance environment. For secure setup there is no way "IT guys must then<br>>>> translate x, y & z function into the appropriate access levels for that<br>>>> accountant within the system". Simply put a person who is a trained IT<br>>>> expert knows too much about how the system works and therefore cannot be<br>>>> assigned access administration. The overall person for access admin is a<br>>>> "super-user" or "Chief Security Officer"or a title in that direction.<br>>>> This<br>>>> super user assigns access rights to users, such as ability to<br>>>> add,delete,<br>>>> update, edit, view, etc records. To assign these rights in practically<br>>>> all<br>>>> IT systems the super user must himself have those same rights, otherwise<br>>>> he/she cannot assign them to other users. A system where a super-user is<br>>>> an<br>>>> IT expert is a very weak system. The IT expert should never have ability<br>>>> to<br>>>> enter a system and change records. If you analyse the IFMIS problem you<br>>>> will realise that it is not a problem of IT experts infiltrating the<br>>>> system. It is just password misuse by ordinary users. At least I agree<br>>>> with<br>>>> you on one thing - IT expertise role and password administration must<br>>>> never<br>>>> be put in the same office. In most banks and finance environments the<br>>>> super-user function is undertaken by the CEO or a very senior executive<br>>>> who<br>>>> is OUTSIDE the IT function.<br>>>><br>>>> THERE IS NO PROBLEM WITH IFMIS. The users, as is normal in any IT<br>>>> system,<br>>>> are the weakest link. It is like having pilots who are busy with<br>>>> corruption<br>>>> to fly a plane then when the plane crashes we say there was a problem<br>>>> with<br>>>> the plane.<br>>>><br>>>> W.<br>>>><br>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017, at 02:54 PM, Walubengo J wrote:<br>>>><br>>>> @Dr Siganga, my comments below:<br>>>><br>>>> >>1. Hi Walu - I do not agree with you that access administration<br>>>> (passwords) is a technical function. In most cases passwords just mimic<br>>>> authorization structures that pre-exist in a manual system.<br>>>> >>><br>>>> Response:Yes and NO.<br>>>> Yes passwords and their access levels are controls that mimic the<br>>>> authorization levels of the manual system. However, their implementation<br>>>> in<br>>>> an ideal environment should be segregated. E.g the finance director<br>>>> should say in writing: 'I need my accountant to do x, y & z function' .<br>>>> The IT guys must then translate x, y & z function into the appropriate<br>>>> access levels for that accountant within the system.<br>>>><br>>>> Finance retains the administrative oversight in terms of triggering the<br>>>> password request and profiling the access levels desired. IT retains the<br>>>> technical function of implementing the same. Never put these two roles<br>>>> in<br>>>> one office. Shida mingi inajiletea.<br>>>><br>>>> >>2. I also differ with your suggestion that it is the work of technical<br>>>> people to enforce, check or review system controls. That should be the<br>>>> function of an independent auditor.<br>>>> >><br>>>> RESPONSE: Yes and NO.<br>>>> Yes, independent or external auditors (hopefully Information System<br>>>> Auditors) do review the technical controls. But this is often an annual<br>>>> exercise. So serious organisation do not wait for a year to be told<br>>>> their<br>>>> controls were not effective. They have INTERNAL information system<br>>>> auditors<br>>>> (who are technical) to continuously monitor/enforce that these IT<br>>>> controls<br>>>> are in place, working and/or need to be updated. Other organisation may<br>>>> allocate this role to the Information Security Officer, either way these<br>>>> are ICT technical chaps.<br>>>><br>>>> walu.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ------------------------------<br>>>> From: waudo siganga <emailsignet@mailcan.com><br>>>> To: Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke ><br>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:55 PM<br>>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee<br>>>> IFMIS<br>>>><br>>>> Hi Walu - I do not agree with you that access administration (passwords)<br>>>> is a technical function. In most cases passwords just mimic<br>>>> authorization<br>>>> structures that pre-exist in a manual system. It is very important that<br>>>> the<br>>>> access of technical people to a system, especially a financial one, be<br>>>> as<br>>>> inhibited as possible. Those who access the system should only be<br>>>> capable<br>>>> of doing the functions they would perform in a manual system. To enhance<br>>>> security of the system, access administration should be overseen by a<br>>>> most<br>>>> senior person who is NOT trained to do technical work on the system.<br>>>><br>>>> I also differ with your suggestion that it is the work of technical<br>>>> people<br>>>> to enforce, check or review system controls. That should be the function<br>>>> of<br>>>> an independent auditor.<br>>>><br>>>> Overall I think there is much misunderstanding about IFMIS. The problem<br>>>> is<br>>>> not technical; it is administrative. Specifically access administration<br>>>> (passwords).<br>>>><br>>>> W.<br>>>><br>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017, at 01:06 PM, Walubengo J via kictanet wrote:<br>>>><br>>>> Grace B via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke > wrote>>><br>>>> Second, the problem with IFMIS, it appears is a lack of commitment to<br>>>> simple values such as integrity and prudent stewardship of public funds.<br>>>> What guarantee wold we have that ICTA would be different from Treasury?<br>>>><br>>>> >><br>>>> Segregation of duties solves this. Treasury continues being the Process<br>>>> owner, but surrenders the Technical leadership of the system/ERP to ICT<br>>>> Authority. So if it is a case of passwords and their use, expiry amongst<br>>>> other technical issues, we know it is ICT Authority to manage (and take<br>>>> blame).<br>>>><br>>>> It is often a confusing and thin line. The line between Administrative<br>>>> and<br>>>> Technical authority.<br>>>><br>>>> But you can look at it in terms of the President's Security detail.<br>>>> The<br>>>> President maybe the (Administrative) boss of his security detail, but<br>>>> the<br>>>> President can never tell his security detail HOW to guard him or what<br>>>> weapons to use or how many guards he needs, where to position them etc.<br>>>><br>>>> These are TECHNICAL issues that the President cannot and should never<br>>>> pretend to be dictating on since they lie squarely within the<br>>>> NIS/Inspector<br>>>> General domain. The moment NIS start taking technical instructions from<br>>>> the<br>>>> President, is the moment our security system will collapse.<br>>>><br>>>> If we get this seperation of authority right, we solve the IFMIS puzzle.<br>>>><br>>>> walu.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ------------------------------<br>>>> From: Grace B via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke ><br>>>> To: jwalu@yahoo.com<br>>>> Cc: Grace B <nmutungu@gmail.com><br>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 7:11 AM<br>>>> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee<br>>>> IFMIS<br>>>><br>>>> Interesting discussion. There are those who would look at IFMIS as a<br>>>> public finance management issue as opposed to an ICT one but this is not<br>>>> really count when giving management mandate to either Treasury or ICTA<br>>>> as<br>>>> long as the objectives of PFM (Article 201 of Katiba) are met.<br>>>> One of the issues voiced about IFMIS since devolution/new Constitution<br>>>> has<br>>>> been the problems experienced by county governments and other<br>>>> independent<br>>>> organs eg commissions in accessing funds in a timely manner. (We assume<br>>>> that Executive has not had too many problems assessing funds and may<br>>>> have<br>>>> indeed been facilitating leakage)<br>>>> One issue with transferring the responsibility of maintaining IFMIS to<br>>>> ICTA, it seems would be that there could be few differences between ICTA<br>>>> and Treasury. First, both are Executive institutions that may support<br>>>> devolved and independent structures in line with the soft policy<br>>>> direction<br>>>> of the government of the day. Second, the problem with IFMIS, it appears<br>>>> is<br>>>> a lack of commitment to simple values such as integrity and prudent<br>>>> stewardship of public funds. What guarantee wold we have that ICTA would<br>>>> be<br>>>> different from Treasury?<br>>>><br>>>> Regards<br>>>><br>>>> 2017-01-18 5:54 GMT+03:00 Ali Hussein via kictanet <<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke >:<br>>>><br>>>> Barrack<br>>>><br>>>> We are saying the same thing really.. Let's assume that the ICTA is the<br>>>> ICT Department of the Government (which I doubt it is equipped to<br>>>> execute<br>>>> that mandate) then 'managing' here really means providing support to the<br>>>> system.<br>>>><br>>>> I think it's time the Government considers the role of Chief Information<br>>>> Officer to really manage the strategic thrust of all ICT initiatives<br>>>> across<br>>>> ministries. The CIO can then be held accountable for overall efficiency<br>>>> and<br>>>> security of all Government ICT Systems. This CIO needs to report<br>>>> directly<br>>>> to the Chief Executive Officer (President) of the country. Now, that<br>>>> person<br>>>> could be seconded or be a part of the ICTA with a doted line<br>>>> responsibility<br>>>> to the CS, MOICT...<br>>>><br>>>> Ultimately the overall responsibility of how well our Government ICT<br>>>> Systems work lies squarely on the CEO's desk. Look no further.<br>>>><br>>>> Ali Hussein<br>>>> Principal<br>>>> Hussein & Associates<br>>>> +254 0713 601113<br>>>><br>>>> Twitter: @AliHKassim<br>>>> Skype: abu-jomo<br>>>> LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin. com/in/alihkassim<br>>>> <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim><br>>>> "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but<br>>>> a<br>>>> habit." ~ Aristotle<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Sent from my iPad<br>>>><br>>>> On 17 Jan 2017, at 11:27 PM, Barrack Otieno via kictanet <<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke > wrote:<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Hi Ali,<br>>>><br>>>> ERP grew from MRP (Material Resource Planning which was a means of<br>>>> planning and allocating resources in Factories. The difference between<br>>>> the two is that MRP's were stand alone systems whereas ERP's are<br>>>> modular and have more functionality. From an evolution perspective ,<br>>>> it would be ideal to manage IFMIS from Ministry of Finance since they<br>>>> are the custodians of the treasury and normally allocate resources<br>>>> through the budgeting process. From a Project Management perspective,<br>>>> it would be ideal to manage IFMIS from ICTA since it is the<br>>>> specialized agency meant to manage government technology investments.<br>>>><br>>>> Regards<br>>>><br>>>> On 1/17/17, S.M. Muraya via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke ><br>>>> wrote:<br>>>><br>>>> Doubt Treasury economists and accountants are well placed to provide<br>>>> Cyber<br>>>><br>>>> Security :)<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> We need the ICT Authority to configure enterprise wide data protection<br>>>><br>>>> (limiting theft of passwords & access to IFMIS).<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> In 2016, the UN ranked the UK as # 1 in providing digital services.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> https://publicadministration. un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/<br>>>> UN-E-Government-Survey-2016<br>>>> <https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2016><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> The Government Digital Service (GDS) is part of their Cabinet Office,<br>>>> not<br>>>><br>>>> their Treasury.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> https://www.gov.uk/government/ publications/govuk-pay/govuk- pay<br>>>> <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/govuk-pay/govuk-pay><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Their Treasury is consulted about the payment system 👆🏾 the GDS<br>>>><br>>>> continues to build.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> SMM<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> *"Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one<br>>>><br>>>> who takes a city." Prov 16:32*<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Ali Hussein <ali@hussein.me.ke> wrote:<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> I fundamentally disagree with this assertion.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> First,y, the role of a CIO is to support the enterprise. I have never<br>>>><br>>>> heard in my life of an ERP Director. This is just adding a superfluous<br>>>><br>>>> layer of useless bureaucracy.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> The owner of an ERP is the business with each department taking<br>>>> ownership<br>>>><br>>>> of their components:-<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> 1. Financials - CFO<br>>>><br>>>> 2. CRM (Commercial/marketing/sales)<br>>>><br>>>> 3. Procurement - Procurement which sometimes comes under Finance<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Etc.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> The CIO takes ownership to ensure that the company is well oiled to<br>>>><br>>>> execute on its mandate. This in my humble opinion goes beyond ERPs and<br>>>><br>>>> talks to aligning the Technology Strategy with the Business Strategy.<br>>>> For<br>>>><br>>>> example in the banking sector where increasingly the more savvy banks<br>>>> are<br>>>><br>>>> taking a 'Platform Thinking' approach. This allows partners to plug into<br>>>><br>>>> their core technology through APIs to enable them extend capabilities<br>>>> and<br>>>><br>>>> hence offerings to their customers.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> The role of a CIO has fundamentally changed to speak to the need for<br>>>><br>>>> using<br>>>><br>>>> Technology as an accelerator to successful business models.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Secondly, I don't see how the ICT Authority would be better in managing<br>>>><br>>>> the monster that is IFMIS. Let them first learn the basics of<br>>>><br>>>> communicating<br>>>><br>>>> effectively with the community before taking on this elephant in the<br>>>><br>>>> room.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> *Ali Hussein*<br>>>><br>>>> *Principal*<br>>>><br>>>> *Hussein & Associates*<br>>>><br>>>> +254 0713 601113<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Twitter: @AliHKassim<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Skype: abu-jomo<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> LinkedIn: http://ke.linkedin.com/in/ alihkassim<br>>>> <http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but<br>>>> a<br>>>><br>>>> habit." ~ Aristotle<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Sent from my iPad<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> On 17 Jan 2017, at 6:42 PM, S.M. Muraya via kictanet <<br>>>><br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Interesting comments...<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ICT Authority, not Treasury, should oversee IFMIS<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/ blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560-<br>>>> <http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/2274560-><br>>>><br>>>> 3520560-5j04aq/index.html<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>>><br>>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>>><br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>>><br>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>>><br>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>>><br>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>>><br>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/info% 40alyhussein.com<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>>><br>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>>><br>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>>><br>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>>><br>>>> development.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>>><br>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>>><br>>>> bandwidth,<br>>>><br>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy,<br>>>> do<br>>>><br>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> --<br>>>> Barrack O. Otieno<br>>>> +254721325277<br>>>> +254733206359<br>>>> Skype: barrack.otieno<br>>>> PGP ID: 0x2611D86A<br>>>><br>>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>>><br>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/info% 40alyhussein.com<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com><br>>>><br>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>>> development.<br>>>><br>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>>> bandwidth,<br>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy,<br>>>> do<br>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>>><br>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/ nmutungu%40gmail.com<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/nmutungu%40gmail.com><br>>>><br>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>>> development.<br>>>><br>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>>> bandwidth,<br>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy,<br>>>> do<br>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> --<br>>>> Grace L.N. Mutung'u<br>>>> Skype: gracebomu<br>>>> Twitter: @Bomu<br>>>><br>>>> <http://www. diplointernetgovernance.org/ profile/GraceMutungu<br>>>> <http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/profile/GraceMutungu>><br>>>><br>>>> PGP ID : 0x33A3450F<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>>><br>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/ jwalu%40yahoo.com<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com><br>>>><br>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>>> development.<br>>>><br>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>>> bandwidth,<br>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy,<br>>>> do<br>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> *______________________________ _________________*<br>>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>>><br>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/ emailsignet%40mailcan.com<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/emailsignet%40mailcan.com><br>>>><br>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>>> development.<br>>>><br>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>>> bandwidth,<br>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy,<br>>>> do<br>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> ______________________________ _________________<br>>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/ mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet><br>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ KICTANet/<br>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/><br>>>><br>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/ james.muritu%40gmail.com<br>>>> <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/james.muritu%40gmail.com><br>>>><br>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>>> development.<br>>>><br>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>>> bandwidth,<br>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy,<br>>>> do<br>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/<br>>>><br>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com<br>>>><br>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>>> development.<br>>>><br>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>>> bandwidth,<br>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy,<br>>>> do<br>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> kictanet mailing list<br>>>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>>>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/<br>>>><br>>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/<br>>>> mailman/options/kictanet/murigi.muraya%40gmail.com<br>>>><br>>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform<br>>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>>>> development.<br>>>><br>>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and<br>>>> bandwidth,<br>>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy,<br>>>> do<br>>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>>>><br>>><br>><br>><br>> --<br>> Barrack O. Otieno<br>> +254721325277<br>> +254733206359<br>> Skype: barrack.otieno<br>> PGP ID: 0x2611D86A<br>><br>> _______________________________________________<br>> kictanet mailing list<br>> kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke<br>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet<br>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet<br>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/<br>><br>> Unsubscribe or change your options at<br>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/awatila%40yahoo.co.uk<br>><br>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for<br>> people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>> development.<br>><br>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,<br>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br><br><br>-- <br>Barrack O. Otieno<br>+254721325277<br>+254733206359<br>Skype: barrack.otieno<br>PGP ID: 0x2611D86A<br></div></div></div>
</body>
</html>