<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Title content=""><meta name=Keywords content=""><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Arial;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:sans-serif;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:595.0pt 842.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body bgcolor=white lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri'>I agree with you, but I bet India & Chinese Domain Name registration vs Income per capita will fall out of that graph. I would still support top level domains as suggested. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-family:Calibri;color:black'>From: </span></b><span style='font-family:Calibri;color:black'>kictanet <kictanet-bounces+arebacollins=gmail.com@lists.kictanet.or.ke> on behalf of Mwendwa Kivuva via kictanet <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br><b>Reply-To: </b>KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br><b>Date: </b>Monday, 27 June 2016 11:35 pm<br><b>To: </b>Collins Areba <arebacollins@gmail.com><br><b>Cc: </b>Mwendwa Kivuva <Kivuva@transworldafrica.com>, KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [kictanet] Kenya cuts cost of acquiring .ke domain by a third<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Dr. Waudo,<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 27 June 2016 at 20:37, waudo siganga <<a href="mailto:emailsignet@mailcan.com" target="_blank">emailsignet@mailcan.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Arial'>Hi Mwendwa - maybe Collins was only using <a href="http://co.ke" target="_blank">co.ke</a> as an example, to ask the question whether it is possible to register second level rather than third-level domains on .ke because that could be a business idea????<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:13.5pt;font-family:Arial'>W.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I think my explanation on IG issues has evolved to a level not easily comprehensible. We are talking the same thing here. That the namespace can be opened to accommodate registrations at the second level rather than sub domains. We may get an announcement soon on the same from the relevant bodies. But for that to happen, there must be proper stakeholder engagement. It cannot happen overnight. For example, a reservation period of say 4 years has to be put in place for all the current owners of any .ke domain to register their name first before anybody else takes them up. So I don't expect Collins to own <a href="http://google.ke" target="_blank">google.ke</a> at the expense of <a href="http://google.co.ke" target="_blank">google.co.ke</a>. So if there was a popular name you were dreaming of, you have no luck because the current owners are given first priority.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>There is a misconception by the community that opening up the namespace to allow registration at the second level will push up number, or that it will give people more variety. Nothing can be further from the truth. My crystal ball (not the same as that of Makau Mutua) tells me that we will not achieve more than 10,000 after opening it up. And most of this will be domainers. South Africa have never opened up their .za namespace yet they still managed to get their domains to surpass the one million mark. We are still sub 100k.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I can see Ebele salivating at the possibility of registering Achike Adefolake Adeleke Adenike Fowoke Ibironke Oluwatoke ...<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>KENIC should not rely on Nigeria or any other external source to push our numbers up. Nigeria with 180 million people has only managed a paltry 70k domains in the .ng. They don't have enough disposable income to push their numbers up, let alone ours. You see, there is a correlation of domain registrations with income per capita. See this simple statistics <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>de at 16million domains, population 81million people, per capita <span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black;background:#F9F9F9'>$47,033</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>.uk at 10million domains, population 65million people, per capita <span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black;background:#F9F9F9'>$41,159</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>.za at 1million domains, population 54 million people, per capita $13,165<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>.ng at 70thousand domains, population180million people, per capita $<span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black;background:#F9F9F9'>6,108</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black;background:#F9F9F9'>.ke at 58thousand domains, population 44million people, per capita $2,780</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black;background:#F9F9F9'>My point is, the growth of the .ke namespace is not reliant on excuses that it's not open. Because when we shall open it, then we will start looking at the next scapegoat. Remember the number portability that we all asked to have? It's virtually dead.</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"sans-serif","serif";color:black'>Sincerely</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black;background:#F9F9F9'>,</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Helvetica;color:black;background:#F9F9F9'>Mwendwa Kivuva</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal>_______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/arebacollins%40gmail.com The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development. KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>