<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>-- The idea for community broadband initiatives - these should be revisited and to barracks point NOFBI should not lay idle. it should be used to offer free or very near free backhaul. when we discuss content we may even find that if enough content is generated locally, then its up to whoever needs it to figure out how to get it from that 'local community'.<br></div>-- the above will drive a need for CDN and even local exchange points.<br></div>-- infrastructure sharing is something that should be encouraged. other areas like wifi roaming etc are not very popular here but there is a limit to the number of ssids i can authorise on my phone.<br></div>-- other areas in systems we need quick action are general systems design in areas like dns, load balancing parental controls etc that never get mentioned but are critical. <br></div><div>-- IPv6 - hard to discuss infrastructure without how its addressed. this is so important for the near future we should probably form a taskforce immediately to come up with recommendations and an implementation plan. there are countries where governments are taking charge of their ip address management * ie as an LIR. I dont agree with them but its happening.<br></div><div><br></div>JG<br><div><div><div><div><div><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Barrack Otieno via kictanet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke" target="_blank">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Walu,<br>
<br>
While i appreciate Ali's thesis, Mwana inchis view on the NOFBI is<br>
disheartening. The few people i have asked seem to allude to the fact<br>
that they are still unable to access services upcountry (mashinani). I<br>
think this was one of the factors that slowed down IFMIS<br>
implementation in Northern Kenya (i stand to be corrected).<br>
Be that as it may we have the private sector popularising Fibre and<br>
related services through our good friend 'Bogua' who has since started<br>
other ventures that are not relevant to this discussion at this point.<br>
I think the government needs to market NOFBI properly and look at the<br>
public including government departments as customers otherwise the<br>
initiative will not fly. Can you imagine the county government of<br>
Kajiado has been building toilets for the community yet a good number<br>
of residents still prefer the serene environment. In fact in some<br>
parts of Bondo billboards had to be erected to discourage people from<br>
dishonouring the environment and peoples farms. In a small way i am<br>
trying to explain how complex serving mwanainchi can be.<br>
<br>
Unless it is sold or brought to Mwanainchi in simple terms we will not<br>
get our return on investment. I say this knowing that it is not<br>
governments business to look for money even though it needs the money<br>
so point number<br>
1. Packaging, marketing or branding of NOFBI to Mwanainchi is important.<br>
2. Let us fix this trunking issue once and for all, we need a solution<br>
that will stop this business of our roads being dug up by every<br>
operator. We can have trunking provided by County governments for use<br>
by all operators at uniform rates. Some County governments have<br>
discouraged the spread of the Internet with ridiculous requirements<br>
for laying fibre.<br>
3. Including a provision for Internet Infrastructure in the Building<br>
Code to make it easier for Infrastructure Service Providers to provide<br>
connectivity to clients.<br>
<br>
ni hayo to kwa sasa, still thinking about the role of Posta.<br>
<span class=""><br>
On 6/22/16, Walubengo J via kictanet <<a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a>> wrote:<br>
> Thnx @Al (for breaking down your thesis :-)<br>
> And very true, we talk of infrastructure sharing, when one of the biggest<br>
> infrastructure project, the National Fiber Optical Cable remains quite under<br>
> utilized. It may be reaching all counties but how many counties use it<br>
> beyond accessing govt IFMIS services?<br>
> There seems to be little leveraging on this cable beyond mandatory<br>
> government services with private sector largely preferring to duplicate<br>
> their own fiber. The question is what Policy intervention do we need to<br>
> increase usage?<br>
> Perhaps a redifination of the management structures? Or serious incentives<br>
> for private Telkos - if they light/use NOFBI as the backbone (which they<br>
> wont unless they are sure of the stability of the operational /management<br>
> issues).<br>
> Which also brings in the Equity /Sharholding issues. TEAMS (submarine cable)<br>
> seems to work better since the Shareholding and Operational management<br>
> issues seem to be more spread around...<br>
> Lets have more views for day 1 which ends in jst another 6hrs :-)walu.<br>
><br>
</span><span class="">> From: Ali Hussein <<a href="mailto:ali@hussein.me.ke">ali@hussein.me.ke</a>><br>
> To: Walubengo J <<a href="mailto:jwalu@yahoo.com">jwalu@yahoo.com</a>>; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions<br>
> <<a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a>><br>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 3:22 PM<br>
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] Day 1:-How to Develop ICT infrastructure<br>
><br>
> Walu<br>
> Excerpts from my 'thesis' to cover this topic:-<br>
> 1. The performance or utilization of the National Optic Fibre Backbone<br>
> (NOFBI) must be brought into review. According to the ICT Authority<br>
> website:-<br>
> The ICT Authority is implementing Phase 11 of the National Fibre Optic<br>
> cable. The construction begun in September 2014 and is expected to be<br>
> complete by June 2016. The second phase will build 1,600KM of fiber linking<br>
> all the 47 county headquarters and an additional 500KM dedicated for<br>
> military use. This is in addition to the existing 4,300KM of NOFBI I<br>
> completed in 2009. NOFBI phase1passes 58 towns in 35 countiesTo date:<br>
</span>> - 1200Km out of the 1600KM civil works are completed.<br>
> - 900Km of fibre has been laid in the backbone section.<br>
> - The backbone section is now complete and fibre installed in all the 47<br>
<span class="">> counties (Kajiado County fibre in NOFBI I was damaged by road construction)<br>
> and capacity to connect Kajiado County HQ will be sourced from other<br>
> operators whose fibre is along the power line to Namanga<br>
</span>> - Metropolitan fibre civil works has been completed in 35 of 47<br>
<span class="">> counties.<br>
> NOFBI Phase 1 is already in use in the national government, Telkom,<br>
> Safaricom, Jamii Telecom and KENET utilizing more than 3,000KM of the cable.<br>
> The operations and maintenance of NOFBI Phase 1 is being handled by<br>
> Telkom.Read<br>
</span>> more:-<a href="http://www.icta.go.ke/national-optic-fibre-backbone-nofbi/This" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.icta.go.ke/national-optic-fibre-backbone-nofbi/This</a> is<br>
<span class="">> absolutely commendable. We must now move to the next stage of critical<br>
> evaluation of this Critical Infrastructure. a) What are the learnings? b)<br>
> What could we have done better? c) What are the bottlenecks to last mile<br>
> connectivity? d) Why haven't our connectivity costs reduced considering that<br>
> most of the telcos are using this backbone which is a national resource? We<br>
> are stepping on the shoulders of giants who envisioned this resource for the<br>
> country. We must make absolutely sure that we squeeze every ounce of the<br>
> advantage it has given us.<br>
> e) Why are we not in the top 50 global internet penetration rankings? Make<br>
> no mistake about it. Our competition is not Africa. It is global.<br>
> 2. The Universal Service Access Fund is a commendable initiative but too<br>
> often there hasn't been much information on the impact the critical resource<br>
> is having. My suggestion would be to have an interactive real time map<br>
> showing its impact and why certain regions are chosen to receive its largess<br>
> and not others. This should be linked with Infrastructure sharing and last<br>
> mile strategies to provide connectivity from the NOFBI.<br>
> WayLeaves. There has to be robust engagement with counties to ensure that<br>
> ISPs and Telcos are not held to ransom by short term county revenue hunting<br>
> at the expense of spreading ubiquitous broadband connectivity. This is so<br>
> critical that a clear strategy paper needs to be put together by all<br>
> stakeholders to guarantee its implementation.<br>
> What are the roadblocks that hinder us from achieving universal broadband<br>
> connectivity?<br>
</span>> Ali HusseinPrincipalHussein & Associates<a href="tel:%2B254%200713%20601113" value="+254713601113">+254 0713 601113</a> / <a href="tel:0770906375" value="+254770906375">0770906375</a><br>
> Twitter: @AliHKassimSkype:<br>
> abu-jomoLinkedIn: <a href="http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim</a><br>
<span class="">><br>
> "Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what<br>
> no one else has thought". ~ Albert Szent-Györgyi<br>
> Sent from my iPad<br>
> On 22 Jun 2016, at 10:47 AM, Walubengo J via kictanet<br>
> <<a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> How to Develop ICT infrastructure (Day 1-Wed 22nd June 2016) *telecoms,<br>
> broadcast, broadband internet, postal)*Investment incentives (FDI,Equity<br>
> Shares)*Open Access*Infrastructure Sharing (Masts, Ducts, Wayleave<br>
> etc)*Spectrum Management*Postal/National Addressing System*Data Centers,<br>
> IXPs, CDN<br>
</span>> ---So further to the welcome message below, today, we kick off the<br>
<span class="">> discussion with Infrastructure issues in mind. Basically think about what<br>
> needs to be done to ensure a robust telco/internet, broadcast, postal<br>
> environment from an infrastructure perspective. The subtopics above being<br>
> guidelines.<br>
> Contentious issues have been around foreign direct investments with respect<br>
> to the policy requirement for local equity shareholding. Should this be<br>
> mandatory and at what % - keeping in mind that equity share holding requires<br>
> local investors who may not always be keen in keeping money in ICTs<br>
> (preferring traditional destinations of Land/Real estate).<br>
> On Open Access, how far do we want this to go? In mombasa we have the<br>
> submarine landing points implementing open access where SEACOM, TEAMS, LION,<br>
> EASSy etc are open to any interested player and this has worked well. Do we<br>
> want to see this principle practiced domestically in terms of infrastructure<br>
> sharing (Masts, Fiber Ducts, and even Spectrum?)<br>
> Finally what role do we see Postal Kenya taking within the ICT ecosystem,<br>
> particularly with regard to the lack of the National Addressing system -<br>
> which analysts feel is holding back the ecommerce potential.<br>
> Lets hear your views today since tomorrow we move onto INFO-structure<br>
> issues.<br>
> walu.<br>
><br>
</span><span class="">> From: Walubengo J <<a href="mailto:jwalu@yahoo.com">jwalu@yahoo.com</a>><br>
> To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <<a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a>><br>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 10:25 AM<br>
> Subject: ICT Policy Discussions:-Overview, Thematic Topics (Day 1 to Day<br>
> 10)<br>
><br>
> Greetings Listers,<br>
> As promised on monday, we kick off the discussions today and would like to<br>
> share the general flow and how we shall move.<br>
> Basically we have two platforms we shall use and listers are free to use one<br>
> or both of them. The two plaftforms are KICTAnet platform and the Jadili<br>
> Platform (<a href="http://jadili.ictpolicy.org/docs/kenya-ict-policy#heading-1" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://jadili.ictpolicy.org/docs/kenya-ict-policy#heading-1</a>)<br>
> courtesy of Strathmore University, Law School.<br>
> The Jadili platform is hosting the Draft Policy in editable format and<br>
> Listers are encouraged to login and post their specific proposal onto the<br>
> platform.<br>
> The KICTAnet listserver plaftform is where we shall run guided discussions<br>
> as per the plan below. Contributions on both platforms shall be<br>
> consolidated and validated at a later face-2-face function. The overview of<br>
> the discussion will be as shown below.<br>
</span>> How to Develop ICT infrastructure (Day1-Wed 22nd June 2016) *telecoms,<br>
<span class="">> broadcast, broadband internet, postal)*Investment incentives<br>
> (FDI,EquityShares)*Open Access*Infrastructure Sharing (Masts, Ducts,Wayleave<br>
</span>> etc)*Spectrum Management*Postal/National Addressing System*Data Centers,<br>
<span class="">> IXPs, CDN How to Develop ICT Info-Structure (Day2-Thrs 23rd June<br>
> 2016)*Local Content, *Broadcast Content, Diversity, CulturalIdentity*Access<br>
> to Information/OpenData *Local Application Development How to Develop<br>
> Skilled Human Capital(Day 3-Fri 24th June 2016)*ICT integration in primary,<br>
> secondary,tertiary levels,*Specialized Skills<br>
</span>> (Software/Engineering)*Research & Development Capacity*eLiteracy for<br>
> citizens/public *How to enhance Universal Service &Access (Day 4-Mon 27th<br>
> June 2016) *Universal Access (Infrastructure)*Universal Service<br>
> (PWD) *Affordable Internet broadband Services*Affordable User Devices How<br>
<span class="">> to Develop local ICT Industry (Day5- Tue 28th June 2016)*eCommerce, National<br>
> Addressing System*Local eBusiness, * BPOs*Investment incentives (Equity<br>
> Shares)*ICTs in SME, (Small Medium SizeEnterprises)*ICT regional export<br>
</span>> incentives*Local Device Manufacturing How to Accelerate eGovt Services (Day<br>
<span class="">> 6-Wed 29th June 2016)*eHealth, eAgriculture, eTransport,eGovt, eLearning*ICT<br>
</span>> regional (county) incentives)*ICTs in Society, Culture How to enhance<br>
<span class="">> Cybersecurity (Day 7) -Thrs 30th June 2016)*Online Citizen Safety, *Child<br>
> Protection*Privacy issues*Security business<br>
> transactions(Info-Security)*Security & Reliability of CriticalICT<br>
> infrastructure Emerging Issues (Day 8 -Fri 1st July2016)Internet of Things,<br>
</span>> M2MNet Neutrality & OTTBig Data Virtual Money/BlockChains Institutional,<br>
<span class="">> Legal & RegulatoryFramework (Day 9-Mon 4th July 2016)Role of Regulator,<br>
> USAC, CERTs, NCS,ICTA, PCK, CSO, Professional Bodies etcNeeded Legislation,<br>
</span>> Data Protection,eTransaction, Intermediary Liability etc DAY 10, Tue 5th<br>
<span class="">> July -Wrap UP Closure<br>
> I look forward to your active engagement.<br>
> J. Walubengofor KICTAnet.<br>
</span><div><div class="h5">> From: Walubengo J <<a href="mailto:jwalu@yahoo.com">jwalu@yahoo.com</a>><br>
> To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <<a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a>><br>
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 3:25 PM<br>
> Subject: Fw: DRAFT ICT POLICY 2016 LINK-KICTAnet Stakeholder Input<br>
><br>
> Dear Listers,<br>
><br>
> The Ministry of ICT (PS V. Kyalo) has asked KICTAnet to ran a two week<br>
> moderated discussion on the Draft ICT Policy 2016, that will replace the<br>
> current 2006 ICT Policy.<br>
><br>
> Please download and go through in preparation of the online discussions<br>
> scheduled to kick-off this wednesday 22nd June 2016.<br>
> You views will be consolidated and later on you will be invited to validated<br>
> the same at a face-to-face session to be confirmed at a venue and date to be<br>
> confirmed later.<br>
> Kazi kwenyu. Do not say you were not consulted :-)<br>
> Best rgds.<br>
> walu.<br>
><br>
><br>
> ----<br>
> Dear All,<br>
> The Draft ICT Policy 2016 has been posted in the MoICT website for<br>
> stakeholders comments. Please use the link below to access the document.<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.information.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Draft-National-ICT-Policy-20June2016.pdf" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.information.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Draft-National-ICT-Policy-20June2016.pdf</a> Kind<br>
> regards,<br>
> Jane W. Migwi<br>
> Administrative Secretary<br>
> National Communications SecretariatP.O. Box 10756-00100, NBITel:<br>
</div></div>> <a href="tel:%2B254-20-2719953" value="+254202719953">+254-20-2719953</a> / +254-20-2713429Fax: <a href="tel:%2B254-20-2716515" value="+254202716515">+254-20-2716515</a><br>
<span class="">> Cell: <a href="tel:0721%20850%20561" value="+254721850561">0721 850 561</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> kictanet mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet</a><br>
><br>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at<br>
> <a href="https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com</a><br>
><br>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for<br>
> people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and<br>
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT<br>
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and<br>
> development.<br>
><br>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors<br>
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,<br>
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do<br>
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</span>--<br>
Barrack O. Otieno<br>
<a href="tel:%2B254721325277" value="+254721325277">+254721325277</a><br>
<a href="tel:%2B254733206359" value="+254733206359">+254733206359</a><br>
Skype: barrack.otieno<br>
PGP ID: 0x2611D86A<br>
<span class=""><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
kictanet mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet</a><br>
<br>
</span>Unsubscribe or change your options at <a href="https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jgitau%40gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jgitau%40gmail.com</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.<br>
<br>
KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">**Gitau</div>
</div>