<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>Dear Listers<div><br></div><div>We appreciate those who took time to respond to yesterday's questions. We also got a number of response from the Internet Governance Caucus list. Please feel free to go back to Day one and make further comments. </div><div><br></div><div>We have a reporting template and Robert Mureithi of CIPIT Strathmore University has created a google doc of the week's debate and where daily issues will be updated <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ir5NijyJLWw-SwQzkgyd68thvQwJs7yhMC3J7e9Wlk8/edit?pli=1" target="_blank" style="font-size: 12pt;">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ir5NijyJLWw-SwQzkgyd68thvQwJs7yhMC3J7e9Wlk8/edit?pli=1</a></div><div><br></div><div><b>Today, we move on to Day 2 discussion. This is a continuation of Day one on <span style="font-size: 11pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Part 1 on Electronic transactions.</span></b></div><div><b><span style="font-size: 11pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><br></span></b></div><div><span style="font-size: 11pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">Today, we raise two questions:</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 11pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;"><b> </b></span><br><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><b>Article I – 9:<br>
</b><i>Direct marketing through any form of
indirect communication including messages forwarded with automatic message
sender, facsimile or electronic mails in whatsoever form, using the particulars
of an individual who has not given prior consent to receiving the said direct
marketing through the means indicated, shall be prohibited by the member states
of the African Union.<o:p></o:p></i></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><b>Article I – 10:</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><i> The provisions of Article I – 9 above notwithstanding,
direct marketing prospection by electronic mails shall be permissible where:</i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><i>1) The particulars of the addressee have been obtained
directly from him/her,</i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><i>2) The recipient has given consent to be contacted by the
prospector partners</i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><i>3) The direct prospection concerns similar products or
services provided by the same individual or corporate body.</i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12pt; line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><b><br></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 12pt; line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><b>Question:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>I<b>s this a realistic way of dealing with spam? </b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><b><br></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><b>Article I – 27</b><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><i>Where the legislative provisions of Member States have not
laid down other provisions, and where there is no valid agreement between the
parties, the judge shall resolve proof related conflicts by determining by all
possible means the most plausible claim regardless of the message base
employed.</i><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><b><br></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><b>Question:</b><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><b>What is the
meaning of this article and is it necessary?<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span>Some
clarity needed!</b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><b><br></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">We welcome your thoughts.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">Rgds</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">GG</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 16.5pt; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;"><br></p></div><style><!--
.ExternalClass .ecxhmmessage P {
padding:0px;
}
.ExternalClass body.ecxhmmessage {
font-size:12pt;
font-family:Calibri;
}
--></style></div> </div></body>
</html>