<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 19:14, McTim <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dogwallah@gmail.com">dogwallah@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On 3/21/12, Odhiambo Washington <<a href="mailto:odhiambo@gmail.com">odhiambo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Barrack,<br>
><br>
> IMHO, the perception does not really matter. You are not trying to suggest<br>
> that the reporter should have coated the bitter reality with a bit of sugar<br>
> to make it palatable. Forget what people's perception & reaction would be.<br>
> Look at whether it is legal, and most importantly if it makes sense.<br>
<br>
</div>But what if it is illegal, does it still make sense then?<br></blockquote><div><br>Well, you challenge it in court. The thing is, there is no easy way for a particular individual to go and challenge this if they don't have proof of what is being done and how it affects them directly. However, I suppose by the time you have all the clues that it affects you directly, assuming thy have come after you, the evidence itself would have put you on the wrong side of everything:)<br>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
I<br>
> should believe that any Kenyan is free to challenge the process in court if<br>
> they feel it violates their privacy as would have been defined in the<br>
> statutes. If they feel Twitter and FaceBook is their way of redress, let it<br>
> be:-)<br>
> The objective is more important, if you ask me. It's simple. If anyone<br>
> plays against the norms/rules, there must be a way of finding them and<br>
> dealing with them. You see, Police gun down armed thugs every other day,<br>
> which I believe is worse, but that's the surest way of handling the<br>
> scenario. So is sniffing the surest way of apprehending cyber offenders.<br>
> CIA does it, FBI does it, Kenya Police must do it. Because there isn't<br>
> another way.<br>
<br>
</div>examining logs is one other way<br></blockquote><div><br>Examining logs - I don't know what their equipment is capable of, but the last time I checked, logs did not contain the content, like email content. They'd provides clues though.<br>
</div></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Best regards,<br>Odhiambo WASHINGTON,<br>Nairobi,KE<br>+254733744121/+254722743223<br>_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <br>I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler.<br>
<span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#007f00"><img src="cid:image001.png@01CBFF85.F00DA370" width="35" height="33"></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#007f00" lang="EN-US">Please consider the environment before printing this email. </span><br>
<br>