<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div></div><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>The provider is Orange/Telkom, my target was not CCK that was just an aside on who should actually be making sure that this kind of issues are resolved.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards<br> </div>Robert Yawe<br>KAY System Technologies Ltd<br>Phoenix House, 6th Floor<br>P O Box 55806 Nairobi, 00200<br>Kenya<br><br><div>Tel: +254722511225, +254202010696<div><br></div><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><br><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo@gmail.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> robert yawe
<robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Fri, 6 May, 2011 10:50:01<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [kictanet] Dirty IPs<br></font><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 09:05, robert yawe <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk" target="_blank" href="mailto:robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk">robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div style="font-size:12pt;"><div></div><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>The problem is not the IP at my end but the IP of the providers SMTP server, they are the only ones who can request for it to be cleared but they are unresponsive, I know I have the freedom to move to another provider but does that really solve the problem of licensed operators not being monitored.</div>
<div><br></div><div>What use is it then to have CCK license providers and then not police them or is it that their only objective is revenue collection? I expect that licensing by CCK of a provider is similar to KeBS placing their mark on a product, an assurance to the public that the particular organisations products and services have been vetted and soon to meet certain set performance levels.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I remember all
the Hullabaloo about the DG, aren't some of this issues what should determine the KPIs for the organisation, its executive and finally the board of directors?</div><div class="im"><div><br><br></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote><div><br>Robert,<br><br>If your target audience was the CCK and the need for them to police the licensed providers, then you should have said this earlier:-)<br><br>We were focusing on the "general" problem and how you can go about solving the problem.<br>
<br></div></div>Can you please name the ISP in this case please? We've named Safaricom and KDN here before, so I don't see why you should keep referring to a nameless provider.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Best regards,<br>
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,<br>Nairobi,KE<br>+254733744121/+254722743223<br>_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ <br>I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler.<br><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#007F00;"><img src="cid:1.3789094964@web27805.mail.ukl.yahoo.com" width="35" height="33"></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;color:#007F00;" lang="EN-US">Please consider the environment before printing this email. </span><br>
<br>
</div></div></div><div style="position:fixed"></div>
</div></body></html>