<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">Nyaki,<br><br>am sure there are Lawyers on this list who are better positioned to respond but my gut feeling is that the where the New constitution has "defined" a constitutional office (e.g. AG, Chief Justice, etc) then government has no option but to apply new rules.<br><br>However, the DGs position is not to my recollection a constitutional office and so the appointments in this case are government by the existing Kenya Communication Amendment Act (2009) and Kenya Communication Act 1998. <br><br>In the above Acts, the Chairman of the Board is appointed by the President. The Director General of CCK (DG) is appointed by the Minister (of Info&Coom). However, the DGs name is recommended to the Minister by the CCK Board. In other words the minister despite having a final say, has limited choice but to select from the three names
forwarded by the Board -who also have the mandate to do the shortlisting during recruitment and ofcourse the firing during seperation.<br><br>Previous Minister tended to ignore this bit and got away with it. In the current constitutional dispensation they are finding it increasingly difficult to play these type of games.<br><br>walu.<br><br> <br><br>--- On <b>Fri, 3/25/11, Catherine Adeya <i><elizaslider@yahoo.com></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Catherine Adeya <elizaslider@yahoo.com><br>Subject: Re: [kictanet] Rationale behind proposed CCK change of guard?<br>To: "Walubengo J" <jwalu@yahoo.com><br>Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br>Date: Friday, March 25, 2011, 6:33 PM<br><br><div id="yiv962506429"><style type="text/css"><!--#yiv962506429 DIV {margin:0px;}--></style><div
style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14pt;"><div>Walu,<br><br>Are the current or forthcoming appointments (for this year) using the Old or New Constitution at the moment? It does have implications on how much power the Board has and how much the Minister has. In some cases I still think they are being used interchangeably but I would be interested in getting a response to my question.<br><br>Nyaki<br></div><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14pt;"><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Walubengo J <jwalu@yahoo.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> elizaslider@yahoo.com<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
<kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Fri, March 25, 2011 1:26:30 PM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [kictanet] Rationale behind proposed CCK change of guard?<br></font><br><table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font: inherit;" valign="top">@ Francis,<br><br>I agree. The silence on this issue is indeed loud. And now the problem seems to be getting aggravated by the minister's intention to review what the Board had ruled.<br><br>But my comment is that once any CEO "falls" out with his/her Board, then the environment is already soiled and one of them (the Board) or the CEO has to go for the greater good of the public. It rarely matters whether it was the Board or the CEO that was in error/underperforming...the eventual loser in such circumstances is the public.<br><br>I think the current Communication Act empowers the Board
to nominate the DG/CEO while the Minister makes the appointment. This means the Board reserves the right to fire and hire the CEO (Eng. Kariuki can correct me if am wrong) and there's very little the Minister can do to reverse such a decision (especially in the
current highly enlightened constitutional dispensation).<br><br>The best route the CEO could take is for the Board's decision to be challenged in a court of law i.e. CEO can claim damages for illegal or unfair dismal and there's sufficient precedence right here in Kenya where this has successfully worked in favour of the CEOs.<br><br>walu.<br><br>--- On <b>Fri, 3/25/11, Francis Hook <i><francis.hook@gmail.com></i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Francis Hook <francis.hook@gmail.com><br>Subject: Re: [kictanet] Rationale behind proposed CCK change of guard?<br>To: jwalu@yahoo.com<br>Cc: "KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions" <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br>Date: Friday, March 25, 2011, 10:28 AM<br><br><div id="yiv962506429">Its gratifying to note that this issue is being taken up by Hon Poghishio. <div><br></div><div><a rel="nofollow"
target="_blank" href="http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate+News/Minister+probes+CCK+board+action+on+chief+executive/-/539550/1132506/-/q1k6c2z/-/index.html">http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate+News/Minister+probes+CCK+board+action+on+chief+executive/-/539550/1132506/-/q1k6c2z/-/index.html</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate+News/Minister+probes+CCK+board+action+on+chief+executive/-/539550/1132506/-/q1k6c2z/-/index.html"></a>And also merits an opinion piece in the same paper:</div>
<div><br></div><div><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Opinion+++Analysis/CCK+board+must+ensure+transparency+is+maintained/-/539548/1132384/-/item/1/-/117kru0/-/index.html">http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Opinion+++Analysis/CCK+board+must+ensure+transparency+is+maintained/-/539548/1132384/-/item/1/-/117kru0/-/index.html</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Opinion+++Analysis/CCK+board+must+ensure+transparency+is+maintained/-/539548/1132384/-/item/1/-/117kru0/-/index.html"></a>I find the silence on KICTANET on this issue rather unsettling....if anything it merits more debate that customer service and quality of service issues - ironically, IMHO, to throw Mr Njoroge under the bus, may allow such issues to persist...</div>
<div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="yiv962506429gmail_quote">On 15 March 2011 11:05, Francis Hook <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow">francis.hook@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="yiv962506429gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>In today's Business Daily is the story about the looming exit of Charles Njoroge from CCK.</div><div><br></div><div><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate+News/Change+of+guard+looms+at+CCK+as+board+asks+for+Njoroges+exit/-/539550/1125014/-/eo20uc/-/">http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Corporate+News/Change+of+guard+looms+at+CCK+as+board+asks+for+Njoroges+exit/-/539550/1125014/-/eo20uc/-/</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>Looking at CCK's Mandate (<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.cck.go.ke/about/what_we_do.html">http://www.cck.go.ke/about/what_we_do.html</a>) and thinking of some aspects of that story (e.g. his appraisal score) and also looking at recent positive developments (anti-competition, lower tariffs, MNP, converged licences, etc), when reviewing Mr Njoroge's tenure vis a vis that mandate, what is the rationale behind his proposed removal? I understand we cannot all be privy to the details of his appraisal but perhaps it merits some open discussion, more so when looking ahead and trying to read the tea leaves in terms of possible revisions/amendment of various sector regulations.</div>
<div><br></div><div>--- </div><div>Francis Hook<br><br><br><br>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Francis Hook<br>+254 733 504561<br><br><br>
</div>
</div><br>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----<br><br><div class="yiv962506429plainMail">_______________________________________________<br>kictanet mailing list<br><a rel="nofollow">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a><br><a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet">http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet</a><br><br>This message was sent to: <a rel="nofollow">jwalu@yahoo.com</a><br>Unsubscribe or change your options at <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com">http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/jwalu%40yahoo.com</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></tbody></table><br>
</div></div>
</div></div></blockquote></td></tr></table><br>