<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="color: black; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt; "></div><div style="color: black; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt; ">It is reassuring that the tariff is a promotion at that sanity shall resume in due course.</div><div style="color: black; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt; "><br></div><div style="color: black; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt; ">In closing I would like to understand why no one has raised the issue of the government regulating the price of fuel upwards but we all seem to call the regulation card when the government tries to stop the free fall of a price. We either want the government totally in or
totally out and stop having double standards.</div><div style="color: black; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt; "><br></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif" size="3">Now that I think of it why do we have a cap on the movement of a share during a particular trading day would you have </font><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif">preferred it if there was no band set?</font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif" size="3"><br></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif"></font><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif" size="3">Finally let us remember the teachings of Abunuasi, if the sufuri can give bath so then can it die. If we cheer on the government when they
regulate the price of maize, wheat and petrol we must do the same when they regulate the price of airtime.</font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif"><br></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif" size="3"></font><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif">Regards<br></font><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif" size="3"> </font></div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif" size="3">Robert Yawe</font><br><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif" size="3">KAY System Technologies Ltd</font><br><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif" size="3">Phoenix House, 6th Floor</font><br><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new
york', times, serif" size="3">P O Box 55806 Nairobi, 00200</font><br><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif" size="3">Kenya</font><br><br><div style="color: black; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt; ">Tel: +254722511225, +254202010696<div><br></div><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><br><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> [Brainiac] <arebacollins@gmail.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> robert yawe <robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cc:</span></b> KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Thu, 20 January, 2011 11:56:56<br><b><span
style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [kictanet] Are we letting the PS get away with this too?<br></font><br>@yawe I would say i agree with you that the best way to tax a nation is
at the point of consumption, doing so makes sense to me (hence the
ridiculous suggestion i made the other day to scrap all income related
taxes and just up vat a point or two), What pains me in this instance
however has more to do with the moral authority to impose an additional
tax burden. Is it any surprise to you that what is needed to implement
the constitution would be hugely boosted by a certain 4.7Billion that
might easily end up somewhere else. <br>
<br>And just who are we kidding, even if safaricom paid all its income
as tax, what is twenty seven billion divided by nine hundred and ninety
something billion times a hundred? less than 3% of our budget. I think
as taxpayers we deserve a break, at least give us a reason to give
cheerflully .. (for God loves a cheerful giver). <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:44 AM, robert yawe <span dir="ltr"><<a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk" target="_blank" href="mailto:robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk">robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex;"><div><div style="font-size:12pt;">
<div></div><div><div>I agree with the PS, the constitution might even be the list of the government funded projects to be directly affected by lower mobile tariffs because airtime like alcohol and fuel have a sin tax.</div>
<div><br></div><div>The best way to tax a nation where 80% of the adults do not pay income tax is to collect at the point of consumption. KRA has enjoyed good tidings and continues to do so because of implementing a tax regime that is customised to the local environment, peculiar situations by peculiar people require peculiar solutions.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Note that the tax on airtime is based on a percentage so do the month, if this value keeps dropping the government collects less and therefore has less funds to meet its expenditure obligations. What
then happens is that they look for other avenues to cover the deficit such as increasing the price of fuel.</div><div><br></div><div>The airtime wars are not local they are global and we make a very small indentation on this organisations bottom line which makes this a playing ground and us pawns and unless our queen, bishops and rocks protect us we shall be left high and try.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Once Airtel realise that their forever tariff changes are not producing the expected results all they need to do is sell off to another multinational player who is then not bound by the forever tariff and can then come in and take over the market from a weakened competition, Strategy 101.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Yes, lower tariffs has a far reaching impact than many of us care to consider, that is why we pay our PS what we do so that he can consider such issues.</div><div><br></div> </div>Robert Yawe<br>KAY System Technologies Ltd<br>
Phoenix House,
6th Floor<br>P O Box 55806 Nairobi, 00200<br>Kenya<br><br><div>Tel: +254722511225, +254202010696<div><br></div><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt;"><br><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt;">
<font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><div class="im"><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> [Brainiac] <<a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:arebacollins@gmail.com" target="_blank" href="mailto:arebacollins@gmail.com">arebacollins@gmail.com</a>><br></div>
<b><span style="font-weight:bold;">To:</span></b> <a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk" target="_blank" href="mailto:robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk">robertyawe@yahoo.co.uk</a><div class="im"><br><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Cc:</span></b> KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <<a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke" target="_blank" href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a>><br>
</div><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tue, 18 January, 2011 11:42:29<br><b><span style="font-weight:bold;">Subject:</span></b> [kictanet] Are we letting the PS get away with this too?<br></font><div>
<div></div><div class="h5"><br>I seriously hope that this <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://bit.ly/famTA5">http://bit.ly/famTA5</a> is just some
fanatical reporting at Nation Media (would not be shocked) but if so, if these words came out of your mouth bwana PS, <div><br>
</div><div>THAT THE PRICE WARS IN THE MOBILE INDUSTRY MIGHT DERAIL THE NEW CONSTITUTION. </div><div><br></div><div>Are you for Real? Is that not cartel behaviour right there? So now what, are you going to "adjust" the lowest interconnection fees upwards to normalize all this? so that what? Safaricom can make more money? </div>
<div><br></div><div>Playing on the public with FUD now? what happened to market forces? who would run their company to a grind just to offer the cheapest? Revenue collection? how about we first spend PRUDENTLY what we collect? how about ALL of us pay taxes for starters? and why not just LOWER taxes and increase the tax bracket? </div>
<div> <br clear="all">I have never been disappointed like i have on reading this. </div><div><br></div><div>If it looks like Impunity, Smells like Impunity , guess what it is.... </div><div><br>
</div>
</div></div></div></div></div><div></div>
</div><br>
</div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><table style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:12px;margin-top:5px;" width="100%" cellspacing="0">
<tbody><tr><td colspan="2" style="background-color:rgb(237, 241, 247);padding:5px;"><font style="font-family:Arial, sans-serif;font-size:12px;color:rgb(0, 51, 153);text-decoration:none;"><i>“The twentieth century has been characterized by three developments of great <b>political </b>importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate <b>power</b>, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate <b>power</b> against democracy”</i></font></td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p style="padding-top:3px;">~ Alex Carey ~</p><p style="padding-top:3px;">Tel No: 0x2af23696</p></td></tr></tbody></table></span></div><br>
</div></div></div><div style="position: fixed; color: black; font-family: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; font-size: 12pt; "></div>
</div><br>
</body></html>