<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV>There is no justification for the introduction of this kind of a tax. It would be more logical to have radaition satandards set limits enforced with a fine to those who install eqipment which exceed the set standard radiation limits. In any case this could only apply to the hanset vendors, the equipment suppliers and operators, not the end users. There are generally accepted international standards which guide the indutry which are already There is no rational thinking behind all this. Taxation cannot be used as an enforcement of regulations/laws to limit the radiation from equipment. It is even worse that students and researchers are to be taxed for the research work, whose results could be of the lbenefit of the
wealfare of the socitey. Passing the tax to the end user should not be seen as a solution, as this will only increase the cost of using mobile phone and hamper the growth in the industry. The operators should find a better approach to the issue, not to take an easy path. Intevetion by the regulatry authority is ncessary.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Regards</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>VKO<BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Grace Bomu <nmutungu@gmail.com><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> volunga@yahoo.com<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Cc:</SPAN></B> KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Fri, March 12, 2010 9:13:19 AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> [kictanet] PROPOSED RADIATION TAX: PROTECTION OR A BARRIER TO ACCESS?<BR></FONT><BR>See article on proposed radiation tax that appeared in business daily....<BR>http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Company%20Industry/New%20tax%20jolts%20mobile%20phone%20pricing%20/-/539550/877542/-/item/2/-/18ln3sz/-/index.html<BR>
<H1>New tax jolts mobile phone pricing </H1><BR>
<DIV id=articlemeta>By Okuttah Mark (<A id=author_link rel=nofollow>email the author</A>)</DIV>
<P></P>
<DIV>
<P>A new “radiation tax” is threatening to upset household budgets at a time when families are grappling with the rising cost of living despite the recent adoption of a less volatile method of tallying consumer price changes.</P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P>The tax is one of the sticking points in proposals by the Radiation Protection Board to beef up its revenues. </P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P>Besides proposing higher fees for its services, the board has broadened the range of items on which it can charge penalties for releasing harmful rays to the atmosphere to include mobile phone handsets, microwave ovens and transmission masts owned by telecommunications companies. </P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P>Industry players fear the new fees will dampen the recent growth in the telecommunications and consumer electronics sectors by pushing up retail prices for handsets, microwave ovens and other household items deemed to emit electromagnetic rays beyond the reach of the majority.</P></DIV>
<DIV>
<P>The board is seeking public views on the proposed levies, which some stakeholders have vowed to resist because they will mean additional taxation and a burden on consumers. <BR></P>
<P>See full article here: http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/Company%20Industry/New%20tax%20jolts%20mobile%20phone%20pricing%20/-/539550/877542/-/item/0/-/18ln3uz/-/index.html<BR></P></DIV><BR clear=all><BR>-- <BR>Grace L.N. Mutung'u (Bomu)<BR>+254721898732<BR>+254736091242<BR>Kenya<BR><BR></DIV></DIV></div><br>
</body></html>