<div>Hi Alice, </div>
<div><br>Thanks for sharing this information. It answers some of the concerns that have been raised. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>One issue that is still not addressed is the statement below, if XYZ Ltd said it was a Kenyan registered company and someone went to the registrar of companies and failed to locate any evidence of its existence it would be sure to raise an eyebrow.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>>The remaining 25% is owned by Herakles Telecom, our >New York based development company.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Herakles Telecom doesn't show up as a New York state registered entity, so it might help to clarify if this is a yet to be formed entity or what the nature/status of the entity is. </div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="http://appsext8.dos.state.ny.us/corp_public">http://appsext8.dos.state.ny.us/corp_public</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Mike Theuri</div>
<div> </div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 17, 2008 9:20 AM, alice <<a href="mailto:alice@apc.org">alice@apc.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Hi all<br><br>FYI<br><br>-------- Original Message --------<br>Subject: [Fibre-for-africa] Q&A with SEACOM President
<br>Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:39:47 +0100 (CET)<br>From: Wairagala Wakabi <<a href="mailto:wakabi@cipesa.org">wakabi@cipesa.org</a>><br>Reply-To: APC - Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants<br>
<<a href="mailto:fibre-for-africa@lists.apc.org">fibre-for-africa@lists.apc.org</a>><br>To: APC - Private list for use by EASSY Workshop Participants<br><<a href="mailto:fibre-for-africa@lists.apc.org">fibre-for-africa@lists.apc.org
</a>><br>References: <<a href="mailto:478EEA7B.7040702@apc.org">478EEA7B.7040702@apc.org</a>><br><<a href="mailto:FB0CFC3EE5CB18438CE7E5D638A91B8082084F@SFCMAIL01.safaricom.net">FB0CFC3EE5CB18438CE7E5D638A91B8082084F@SFCMAIL01.safaricom.net
</a>><br><<a href="mailto:2526.217.113.73.239.1200565276.squirrel@mail.cipesa.org">2526.217.113.73.239.1200565276.squirrel@mail.cipesa.org</a>><br><br><br><br>Q&A with SEACOM President<br><br>Construction of the13,700 km Sea Cable System (SEACOM,
<a href="http://www.seacom.mu/" target="_blank">www.seacom.mu</a>) is<br>underway and expected to reach completion by June 2009. The cable will<br>comprise of two fibre pairs, connecting South Africa, Mozambique,<br>Madagascar, Tanzania, and Kenya to India and Egypt, with an option for
<br>connectivity into the UAE and Djibouti. Fibre-for-Africa<br>(<a href="http://www.fibreforafrica.net/" target="_blank">www.fibreforafrica.net</a>) spoke to SEACOM Ltd. president Brian Herlihy.<br>Excerpts:<br><br>Q. Who are the partners in SEACOM and how much are they investing in the
<br>network?<br><br>A. SEACOM has publicly announced its investors, it is 75% African owned<br>with Agha Khan Economic Development Group (IPS) out of East Africa,<br>Venfin, Convergence Partners and Shanduka group from South Africa. The
<br>remaining 25% is owned by Herakles Telecom, our New York based development<br>company. Herakles management is also the management of Sithe Global<br>(developer and investor of the Bujagali Hydro in Uganda) and Global<br>
Alumina, a $4.5 billion alumina refinery in Guinea.<br><br>Q. What do you envisage will be the prices for SEACOM's bandwidth?<br>A. SEACOM's pricing is the equivalent of $100 to $170 per Mb/s per month.<br><br><br>Q. In what ways will SEACOM be competitive compared to other fibre
<br>initiatives in the region, such as TEAMS and EASSy?<br><br>A. SEACOM is the only cable offering a PoP to PoP solution for Europe and<br>Asia. I believe this is a large advantage and the purchase of onward<br>capacity is a difficult process. SEACOM understands that TEAMS has very
<br>competitive pricing to Fujairah. SEACOM believes that its pricing to<br>Europe is more competitive than EASSy's pricing to Sudan.<br><br>Q. How will SEACOM assure affordability of services, and how has it been<br>responsive to NEPAD's calls for Open Access?
<br>A. SEACOM has structured each landing point as an open access unit. This<br>has been accomplished in two formats. First, the capital cost of the<br>landing stations is a sunk cost for SEACOM, in other words SEACOM does not
<br>seek to recover the investment costs of the landing station through<br>co-location fees.<br><br>Secondly, each landing station is built with an additional building<br>whereby customers can put their own equipment at the cable station. SEACOM
<br>has published its prices through many different forums. The pricing is an<br>80% discount over current satellite charges and is the only cable offering<br>capacity directly from a PoP (Point of Presence) in Nairobi to a PoP in
<br>Europe or India without the requirement to purchase onward capacity.<br><br>Q. Would you say the fact that SEACOM is not a local company in the<br>countries where it is going to land fibre places it at a disadvantage<br>
compared to pother cable systems such as EASSy and TEAMS?<br><br>A. Depending on each country's regulatory regime, SEACOM has either<br>established a local entity to operate the cable or partnered with an<br>existing cable. SEACOM will bring experienced operators to the cable to
<br>ensure that the local entities maintain world class quality service.<br><br>Q. What are your comments to the assertion that it is not viable for the<br>eastern coast of Africa to have three competing cables? Do you see a need
<br>for the cables to cooperate in some areas rather than duplicate<br>everything?<br><br>A. The current capacity demand on the East Coast of Africa is very small.<br>However, we believe that the future demand will experience exponential
<br>growth. Having said the three competing systems would create a large<br>over-supply which could create a short term glut.<br><br>Q. What is Herakles Telecom and where does it operate from?<br>A. Herakles Telecom is a development company set in New York. The
<br>management is the same management that works with Sithe Global<br>(<a href="http://www.sitheglobal.com/" target="_blank">www.sitheglobal.com</a>) and Global Alumina (<a href="http://www.globalalumina.com/" target="_blank">
www.globalalumina.com</a>)<br><br>Q. There has been talk that Herakles staff were involved in the Africa One<br>project which did not materialise, and that they collected money from<br>African telecom, which money has purportedly not been refunded. How true
<br>is this, and how could it affect SEACOM's operations?<br><br>A. I have noted the slander towards myself and JP (Jean Pierre de Leu) out<br>of Kenya. I can confirm that both of us worked and spent many years with<br>Africa ONE for the hope that this project would go forward. However,
<br>neither of us were principals of this project and left the project from<br>2002. It was our understanding that the only countries that made a deposit<br>were Eritrea and Mauritania.<br><br>We understand that the sales person for Eritrea was able to help that
<br>money be returned. It should be noted that the Africa ONE name was sold<br>by AT&T to a private investment group in 1998 and it was this group who<br>was responsible for that money � JP and myself have nothing to do with
<br>this entity. Since Africa (2002) I have worked as a developer on over $5<br>billion of projects in Africa, each of which have excellent reputations<br>and large impacts in their respective countries, including Bujagali in
<br>Uganda. - <a href="mailto:wakabi@cipesa.org">wakabi@cipesa.org</a><br><br>---<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Fibre-for-africa mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Fibre-for-africa@lists.apc.org">
Fibre-for-africa@lists.apc.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.apc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa" target="_blank">http://lists.apc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fibre-for-africa</a><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>kictanet mailing list<br><a href="mailto:kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke">kictanet@lists.kictanet.or.ke</a><br><a href="http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet" target="_blank">http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
</a><br><br>This message was sent to: <a href="mailto:mike.theuri@gmail.com">mike.theuri@gmail.com</a><br>Unsubscribe or change your options at <a href="http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mike.theuri%40gmail.com" target="_blank">
http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mike.theuri%40gmail.com</a><br></blockquote></div><br>