[kictanet] Updates on the Operationalization of the Universal Service Fund

Barrack Otieno otieno.barrack at gmail.com
Tue Jan 17 12:20:38 EAT 2017


Many thanks Rachel, this is great.

Regards

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Alwala, Rachel via kictanet
<kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
> Dear listers,
>
> Happy New Year to you all!
>
>  Following some enquiries, I thought it would be helpful to share an update
> of the operationalization of the Universal Service Fund.   All this
> information is  available for public consumption.  This gives an overview of
> the status of the country’s network connectivity and initiatives currently
> under implementation by Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) with respect
> to the Universal Service Fund (USF) projects.
>
>
>
> BACKGROUND
>
>
>
> The Kenya Information Communications Act 2009 (KICA 2009) and the Kenya
> Information and Communications Regulations 2010 (KICR US&A 2010) mandate the
> Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) to manage and administer the
> Universal Service Fund (USF). During the FY 2015/16, the Authority conducted
> an ICT Access Gaps study to identify ICT infrastructure and services gaps /
> high cost areas and estimate the appropriate financial subsidy amounts
> required from the Universal Service Fund (USF) to facilitate closing of the
> identified ICT gaps.
>
> The Authority in the FY 2015/16 undertook an ICT Access Gaps study to
> identify gaps / high cost areas and establish the subsidy amounts required
> from the Universal Service Fund (USF) to facilitate closing the voice and
> data services gaps.  This study findings were released in mid 2016.
>
>
>
> KEY FINDINGS OF THE ACCESS GAPS STUDY
>
>
>
> 1.1      2 G Coverage
>
> The study established that 94.4% of Kenyan population is covered by 2G
> leaving out only 5.6% of Kenyan population that has no access to voice
> communications services.  Only 164 out of a total of 7,149 sub-locations
> remain totally uncovered, while a further 418 have less than 50% of their
> populations covered by 2G.
>
>
>
> Table 1: Sub-location population 2G coverage
>
> Coverage
>
> 100%
>
>>90%
>
> 50% - 90%
>
> < 50%
>
> 0%
>
> Sub-locations
>
> 5,655
>
> 487
>
> 425
>
> 418
>
> 164
>
>
>
> 1.2      3G Broadband coverage
>
> 78% of the population in Kenya are covered by 3G.
>
> Table 2: Sub-location population 3G coverage
>
> Coverage
>
> 100%
>
>>90%
>
> 50% - 90%
>
> < 50%
>
> 0%
>
> Sub-locations
>
> 2,454
>
> 1,324
>
> 1,146
>
> 977
>
> 1,244
>
>
>
>
>
> 1.3      The Broadcasting Sector
>
> Kenya’s broadcasting market includes over 100 FM radio stations and around
> 40 digital Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) sites.
>
>
>
> Digital Terrestrial Television sites rollout.
>
> The digital signal currently covers 60 per cent of the Kenyan population.
> The signal is available in; Nairobi, Nakuru, Nyeri, Mombasa, Kisumu,Webuye,
> Eldoret, Malindi, Meru (Nyambene), Kisii, Kericho, Narok, Nyahururu, Embu,
> Kisii, Machakos, Murang’a, Naivasha, Nyeri, Webuye, Narok, Mbuinzau,
> Kapenguria, Wajir, Kitui, Lamu and Namanga.
>
>
>
>
>
> 1.4      Post and Courier Sector
>
> There are 623 post offices distributed across all counties as captured in
> Table 3.
>
>
>
> Table 3: Country wide distribution of Post Offices
>
> Administrative Level
>
> Total
>
> At least one PO present
>
> Penetration of post offices
>
> Min
>
> Average
>
> Max[1]
>
> County
>
> 47
>
> 47
>
> 2
>
> 13
>
> 55
>
> Constituency
>
> 295
>
> 264
>
> 0
>
> 2
>
> 14
>
> Ward
>
> 1,450
>
> 480
>
> 0
>
> 33%
>
> 10
>
> Sub-location
>
> 7,149
>
> 524
>
> 0
>
> 7%
>
> 7
>
>
>
> 1.5      Percentage 2G and 3G Network Coverage per County
>
>
>
> Table 4: Estimated 2G and 3G Network coverage by County
>
>
>
> County
>
> 2G (%)
>
> 3G (%)
>
> Baringo
>
> 87.7
>
> 49.1
>
> Bomet
>
> 99.8
>
> 97.7
>
> Bungoma
>
> 96.4
>
> 95.2
>
> Busia
>
> 99.1
>
> 95.4
>
> Elgeyo Marakwet
>
> 97.1
>
> 34.7
>
> Embu
>
> 99.6
>
> 88.3
>
> Garissa
>
> 58.1
>
> 4.6
>
> Homa Bay
>
> 97.8
>
> 87.6
>
> Isiolo
>
> 54.7
>
> 16.4
>
> Kajiado
>
> 74.4
>
> 38.9
>
> Kakamega
>
> 99.9
>
> 93.5
>
> Kericho
>
> 99.6
>
> 87.7
>
> Kiambu
>
> 99.8
>
> 98.3
>
> Kilifi
>
> 91.9
>
> 51.5
>
> Kirinyaga
>
> 100.0
>
> 98.5
>
> Kisii
>
> 99.9
>
> 90.2
>
> Kisumu
>
> 99.9
>
> 98.8
>
> Kitui
>
> 89.2
>
> 49.8
>
> Kwale
>
> 91.5
>
> 46.4
>
> Laikipia
>
> 90.8
>
> 48.9
>
> Lamu
>
> 82.4
>
> 34.4
>
> Machakos
>
> 99.9
>
> 73.0
>
> Makueni
>
> 99.6
>
> 68.7
>
> Mandera
>
> 66.9
>
> 9.4
>
> marsabit
>
> 56.6
>
> 25.2
>
> Meru
>
> 99.8
>
> 85.4
>
> Migori
>
> 99.1
>
> 69.5
>
> Mombasa
>
> 99.7
>
> 99.8
>
> Muranga
>
> 99.7
>
> 80.8
>
> Nairobi
>
> 100.0
>
> 99.9
>
> Nakuru
>
> 99.7
>
> 74.6
>
> Nandi
>
> 99.6
>
> 85.9
>
> Narok
>
> 86.7
>
> 29.9
>
> Nyamira
>
> 99.9
>
> 96.2
>
> Nyandarua
>
> 99.7
>
> 66.1
>
> Nyeri
>
> 99.8
>
> 86.5
>
> Samburu
>
> 55.5
>
> 14.0
>
> Siaya
>
> 99.6
>
> 94.5
>
> Taita-Taveta
>
> 96.4
>
> 43.4
>
> Tana River
>
> 85.8
>
> 12.8
>
> Tharaka Nithi
>
> 97.9
>
> 77.6
>
> Trans Nzoia
>
> 99.9
>
> 81.1
>
> Turkana
>
> 34.8
>
> 10.2
>
> Uasin Gishu
>
> 99.8
>
> 76.2
>
> Vihiga
>
> 99.9
>
> 99.0
>
> Wajir
>
> 48.2
>
> 8.4
>
> West pokot
>
> 69.0
>
> 13.3
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2.0        UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUND INITIATIVES TO IMPROVE ON CONNECTIVITY
>
>
>
> 2.1 USF PRIORITY PROJECTS AND PROJECTS IMPLEMENTATION STATUS
>
> The ICTs Access Gaps study identified two priority projects namely;
>
>
>
> a)   ICT Infrastructure projects to address Voice services: Voice services
> make a large contribution to closing the remaining gaps. This will reduce
> the population coverage gap from 5.6% of the population to around half
> (2.8%) by 2018.
>
>
>
> ·      The Voice gap project were to be tendered as multiple bidding lots at
> the sub-location or ward level. The NFP (Tier 1) operators were to be
> invited to bid for as many or few of the Lots as interests them.
>
>
>
> b)   Education Broadband connectivity projects - Establish a first step
> towards addressing the critical national gap, which exists in connectivity
> of schools in Kenya.
>
>
>
> ·      The education broadband project was to be implemented through a
> framework of partnership with the Ministry of Education, Science and
> Technology. The tender for schools connectivity was to be implemented
> through competitive tendering process.
>
>
>
> ·      The above two USF priority projects shall be implemented under the
> accepted guidelines for USF, which stress on transparency and competitive
> bidding processes as per the procurement Laws in Kenya.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2.1.1     The Voice Service Projects and Implementation Status
>
> A total of 348 sub-locations were identified through the combined GIS and
> Access Gap Model methodology as the priority cases which best meet the
> critical performance criteria suited to “smart subsidies”, meaning that they
> will result in sustainable service provision in the gap areas.
>
> The total of sub-locations to be included in the USF competition reduces to
> 202 after consideration of operator licence obligations between 2016 and
> 2018.
>
> ·        Implementation Status /Achievements
>
> The Authority in August 2016 tendered for the Voice Infrastructure projects,
> which were structured into multiple bidding lots at the sub-location or ward
> level that yielded into 105 lots.
>
> Telecommunications Voice Infrastructure and Services Tender was a restricted
> Tender for Network Facility Providers (NFPs), Tier 1 operators licensed to
> provide GSM mobile services in Kenya.
>
> The Network Facility Providers (NFP, Tier 1) licensed operators were invited
> to bid for as many or few of the Lots as interests them. The Authority on
> 2nd  August shared the restricted tender document with the three NFP Tier 1
> licensees with tender closing date being 5th October 2016.
>
> The Authority held Pre-bidders conference on the 18th August 2016 attended
> by all the NFP Tier 1 operators. Tender evaluations commenced immediately
> after the closing on 5th October 2016.
>
>   Analysis of the USF Voice Project Bids
>
> The Table below shows the numeric results of the competition, indicating
> geographical area, populations and subsidy budget lots bidded and the
> subsidy amount awarded per bidder.
>
> Table 5: Results of the USF Bid Competition
>
>
>
> Lots
>
> Sub-locations
>
> Geog Area
>
> 000’s Km2
>
> Unserved population
>
> Subsidy
>
> Expected Budget
>
> Original Tender
>
> 105
>
> 202
>
> 45,304
>
> 697,971
>
> Max.
> 2.362 Bn
>
> 1.600 Bn
>
> Bid
>
> 37
>
> 86
>
> 29,906
>
> 389,778
>
> 1.458 Bn
>
>
>
> Awards
>
> 34
>
> 78
>
> 24,291
>
> 319,318
>
> Awards 1.245 Bn
>
> 1.245 Bn
>
> Percentage awarded
>
> 32.3%
>
> 38.6%
>
> 53. 6%
>
> 45.7%
>
> 52.7%
>
> 77.8%
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Additional Lots bid but subject to clarification and finally rejected
>
> 2
>
> 7
>
> 5,615
>
> (12.4%)
>
> 70,460
>
> (10.1%)
>
> 0.293 Bn
>
> N/A
>
>
>
> Way Forward
>
> Out of the 105 lots, 37 lots (86 sub-locations) were bided for and 34 (78
> sub-locations) awarded for voice infrastructure development.
>
> Based on the awards, 38.6% of the targeted sub-locations will be reached,
> against the 60-70% projected in the Access Gap Report.
>
> The Authority intends to close the voice gaps in all sub-locations through a
> phased approached with the first batch of 78 sub-locations being contracted
> for infrastructure development in the current fiscal year.
>
>  The Authority noted that Operators generally targeted large service areas
> with heavy subsidies for several new towers rather than smaller areas
> requiring more complex network optimisation.
>
> The Authority is also planning to offer spectrum waivers to encourage roll
> out to the areas considered unattractive by the Mobile Network Operators.
>
> Summary of results
>
> The following graph shows the results on a county-by-county basis indicating
> tendered versus awarded numbers of sub-locations.
>
>
>
> It will be noted that the most successful in terms of targeted sub-locations
> versus awards made were Marsabit, Kwale and Bungoma (100%), followed by
> Wajir (63%) and Narok (57%).
>
>
>
> 2.1.2     Education Broadband Connectivity Projects and Implementation
> Status
>
> The ICT Access Gaps study identified a national gap in access to broadband
> connectivity for the education sector.
>
> In implementing the schools connectivity project, the Authority has
> partnered with the Ministry of Education Science and Technology (MoEST)
> through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to provide broadband
> connectivity to all secondary schools in Kenya.
>
> The first phase of the Education Broadband Connectivity project has been
> designed to provide 5Mbps dedicated Internet connectivity to 896 secondary
> schools identified by the Ministry of Education Science and Technology
> spread across all the 47 counties. The project targeted to connect up to
> 1,000 schools but MoEST provided only 896 secondary schools drawn from all
> the 47 counties in Kenya that met the Internet e-readiness criterion.
>
> Secondary schools designated as “Internet-ready: for the purposes of this
> project shall be those certified by MoEST as meeting the following criteria:
>
>                i.         Connected to the Grid / electricity;
>
>               ii.         A secured computer laboratory with working
> computers;
>
>             iii.         A qualified ICT / computer teacher;
>
>             iv.         Offering students the KCSE Computer studies
> curriculum and submission of students for KNEC examination at Form 4 in 2015
> and/or 2016.
>
> Implementation Status / Achievements
>
> The Authority advertised the Tender for the Education Broadband Connectivity
> Project. This was an “Open Tender” to all licensees contributing to the USF
> levy. The tender was grouped into 9 lots and the tender closed on 19th
> October 2016”. The tender has been awarded to three (3) bidders at total
> cost Kshs. 837 Million.
>
>
>
>
> Based on the data from the Ministry of Education Science and Technology
> (MoEST) Kenya has about 7000 secondary school.  The Authority is connecting
> 896 Secondary school to Broadband within the current financial year.
> Subsequently, the Universal Service Fund will be used to connect all the
> remaining secondary schools.
>
>
>
> STATUS OF 4G COVERAGE
>
>
>
> The Authority has issued LTE spectrum in the 800MHz on trial basis to the
> three (3) Mobile Network Operator i.e Safaricom Ltd in 2014, Airtel Ltd and
> Telkom Ltd in 2016.
>
>
>
> Safaricom Limited has so far rolled out the 4G network in the following five
> (5) major towns i.e Nairobi, Mombasa, Nakuru, Kisumu and Eldoret while the
> other two operators are preparing to commence their 4G network roll.
>
>
>
>
> Annex 1:  Voice Infrastructure Project – Financial Year 2016/17
>
> LOT
>
> COUNTY LOT NO.
>
> COUNTY
>
> WARD
>
> SUBLOCATION
>
> UNSERVED POP’N
>
> MAX. SUBSIDY (KSHS)
>
> B1
>
>
>
>
>
> B2
>
> 202
>
> 697,971
>
> 2,362.011
>
>
>
>
>
> 1
>
> BAR-3
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> MUKUTAN
>
> MUKUTANI
>
> 1,284
>
>     7.940
>
>
>
>
>
> 15,720,000
>
> BARINGO
>
> MUKUTAN
>
> ARABAL
>
> 1,471
>
> 2
>
> BAR-6
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> TIRIOKO
>
> NGORON
>
> 1,501
>
>  18.139
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> TIRIOKO
>
> KULAL
>
> 3,021
>
> 3
>
> BAR-7
>
>
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> TIRIOKO
>
> LOKIS
>
> 2,445
>
>  15.720
>
>
>
> BARINGO
>
> TIRIOKO
>
> NGAINA
>
> 2,516
>
> WEST POKOT
>
> MASOOL
>
> CHEPSERUM
>
> 1,386
>
> 8
>
> BUNG-1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> KORN'GOTUNY
>
> 1,886
>
>
>
> 17.763
>
>
>
> 17,762,999
>
> (13)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 17,763,000
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> CHEPKURKUR
>
> 3,285
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> EMIA
>
> 1,452
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> KUBURA
>
> 3,890
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> 5,467
>
> BUNGOMA
>
> CHEPYUK
>
> KAIMUGUL
>
> 5,709
>
> 12
>
> GAR-7
>
> GARISSA
>
> GOREALE
>
> GOREALE
>
> 4,523
>
>     32.389
>
>
>
> 32,389,000
>
> 14
>
> GAR-2
>
> GARISSA
>
> SANGAILU
>
> HANDARO
>
> 5,102
>
>     24.120
>
> 24,119,999
>
>
>
> 18
>
> IS-3
>
> ISIOLO
>
> GARBATULLA
>
> MALKADAKA
>
> 3,632
>
> 24.860
>
> 24,859,999
>
> (16)
>
> 24,860,000
>
> 19
>
> IS-4
>
> ISIOLO
>
> KINNA
>
> KULAMAWE
>
> 3,532
>
> 28.595
>
> 28,594,999
>
> (4)
>
> 28,595,000
>
> 26
>
> KAJ-7
>
> KAJIADO
>
> KEEKONYOKIE
>
> KISAMIS
>
> 2,429
>
> 28.929
>
>
>
> 28,928,999
>
>
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MOSIRO
>
> EMBARBAL
>
> 2,429
>
> 29
>
> KAJ-10
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MAGADI
>
> ENDOINYO-OLASHO
>
> 1,728
>
> 43.669
>
>
>
> 41,485,549
>
>
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MAGADI
>
> OLOIKA
>
> 1,744
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MAGADI
>
> PAKASE
>
> 3,377
>
> KAJIADO
>
> MAGADI
>
> SHOMPOLE
>
> 2,085
>
> 30
>
> KIL-2
>
>
>
>
>
> KILIFI
>
> SOKOKE
>
> NDUGUMANI
>
> 1,123
>
> 7.169
>
>
>
> 7,168,999
>
>
>
> KILIFI
>
> SOKOKE
>
> MWANGEA
>
> 1,215
>
>
>
> KILIFI
>
> JILORE
>
> MKONDONI
>
> 1,572
>
>
>
> 33
>
> KIT-3
>
>
>
>
>
> KITUI
>
> ENDAU/MALALANI
>
> MALALANI
>
> 2,136
>
> 55.354
>
>
>
>        55,353,999
>
>
>
> KITUI
>
> ENDAU/MALALANI
>
> MAKUKA
>
> 2,033
>
>
>
> KITUI
>
> NUU
>
> MALAWA
>
> 4,352
>
>
>
> KITUI
>
> KANZIKO
>
> ILAMBA
>
> 1,467
>
>
>
>
>
> 37
>
> KIT-5
>
> KITUI
>
> NGOMENI
>
> KIMELA
>
> 2,161
>
> 12.222
>
> 12,221,999
>
>
>
> 38
>
> KW-1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> KWALE
>
> PUMA
>
> BUSA
>
> 7,323
>
> 123.377
>
>
>
>
>
> 123,377,000
>
> KWALE
>
> PUMA
>
> VIGURUNGANI
>
> 3,244
>
> KWALE
>
> NDAVAYA
>
> MWANDIMU
>
> 8,925
>
> KWALE
>
> MACKINON ROAD
>
> KILIBASI
>
> 1,139
>
> KWALE
>
> MWERENI
>
> KASEMENI
>
> 3,060
>
> KWALE
>
> MWERENI
>
> KILIMANGODO
>
> 10,848
>
> 41
>
> MAN-1
>
> MANDERA
>
> KOTULO
>
> EL RAMU
>
> 9,165
>
> 17.990
>
> 17,989,999
>
>
>
> 42
>
> MAN-2
>
>
>
> MANDERA
>
> KOTULO
>
> BORJI GARSE
>
> 3,525
>
> 15.212
>
>
>
> 15,211,999
>
>
>
> MANDERA
>
> KOTULO
>
> KUTAYU
>
> 3,447
>
>
>
> 44
>
> MAN-5
>
> MANDERA
>
> WARANKARA
>
> WARANKARA
>
> 9,387
>
> 13.200
>
> 13,199,999
>
>
>
> 47
>
> MAN-4
>
> MANDERA
>
> TAKABA SOUTH
>
> WANGAI DAHAN
>
> 10,763
>
> 16.760
>
> 15,921,999
>
>
>
> 48
>
> MARS-2
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KARARE
>
> SCHEME
>
> 1,530
>
> 33.111
>
>
>
> 33,110,999
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KARARE
>
> KARARE
>
> 2,576
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KARARE
>
> SONGA
>
> 1,084
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KARARE
>
> KITURUNI
>
> 1,230
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> SAGANTE/ JALDESA
>
> BADASA
>
> 1,204
>
>
>
> 49
>
> MARS-3
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> DUKANA
>
> BALESA
>
> 4,661
>
> 48.554
>
>
>
> 48,553,999
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> DUKANA
>
> EL-HADI
>
> 3,051
>
>
>
> 50
>
> MARS-1
>
>
>
>
>
> MARSABIT
>
> LAISAMIS
>
> NDIKIR
>
> 1,814
>
> 65.669
>
>
>
>
>
> 65,669,000
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KORR/NGURUNIT
>
> NGURUNIT
>
> 3,728
>
> MARSABIT
>
> KORR/NGURUNIT
>
> LONYORI PICHAU
>
> 3,015
>
> SAMBURU
>
> NDOTO
>
> ILLAU
>
> 1,017
>
> SAMBURU
>
> NDOTO
>
> NGURUNIT
>
> 1,611
>
> 53
>
> NAR-3
>
> NAROK
>
> MAJI MOTO/ NAROOSURA
>
> MAJI-MOTO
>
> 1,251
>
> 9.145
>
> 9,144,999
>
>
>
> 54
>
> NAR-4
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> MAJI MOTO/ NAROOSURA
>
> ELANGATA ENTERIT
>
> 3,831
>
> 25.722
>
> 25,721,999
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> MAJI MOTO/ NAROOSURA
>
> ENKUTOTO
>
> 4,568
>
>
>
> 57
>
> NAR-7
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> OLNGARUA
>
> 1,499
>
> 69.787
>
>
>
> 69,786,999
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> OLORTE
>
> 3,114
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> MAUSA
>
> 3,575
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> ENTASEKERA
>
> 3,231
>
>
>
> NAROK
>
> LOITA
>
> OLMESUTIE
>
> 2,031
>
>
>
> 62
>
> SAM-4
>
>
>
> SAMBURU
>
> NYIRO
>
> LONJORIN
>
> 2,164
>
> 22.229
>
>
>
> 22,228,999
>
>
>
> SAMBURU
>
> NYIRO
>
> LKAYO
>
> 3,581
>
>
>
> 68
>
> TKN-7
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KERIO DELTA
>
> NAKURIO
>
> 9,426
>
> 56.435
>
>
>
> 56,434,999
>
> (9)
>
> 56,435,000
>
> TURKANA
>
> KERIO DELTA
>
> NAKORET
>
> 5,155
>
> 70
>
> TKN-11
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOIMA
>
> PUCH
>
> 12,002
>
> 59.938
>
> 59,937,999
>
> (14%Coverage)
>
>
>
> Rejected
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 72
>
> TKN-12
>
> TURKANA
>
> TURKWEL
>
> KAPUS
>
> 8,320
>
> 26.167
>
>
>
> 26,167,000
>
> 73
>
> TKN-9
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KOTARUK/LOBEI
>
> NAIPA
>
> 4,207
>
> 19.160
>
>
>
>
>
> 19,160,000
>
> TURKANA
>
> KOTARUK/LOBEI
>
> LOKIPETOT ARENGAN
>
> 4,861
>
>
>
> 75
>
> TKN-19
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KIBISH
>
> KARACH 1
>
> 5,502
>
> 29.603
>
>
>
> 29,602,999
>
> (26% Coverage)
>
> Rejected
>
>
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KIBISH
>
> KAITEDE
>
> 6,333
>
> 76
>
> TKN-13
>
> TURKANA
>
> LETEA
>
> LOKIPOTO
>
> 18,956
>
> 18.451
>
> 18,450,999
>
> (61% Coverage)
>
> Rejected
>
>
>
> 79
>
> TKN-17
>
>
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOPUR
>
> LOPUSIKI
>
> 3,947
>
> 104.377
>
>
>
> 104,376,999
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> SONGOT
>
> LOKUDULE
>
> 3,216
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> SONGOT
>
> LOKANGAE
>
> 11,599
>
>
>
> 81
>
> TKN-2
>
>
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOKORI/KOCHODIN
>
> KANGITIT
>
> 4,794
>
> 81.124
>
>
>
> 81,123,999
>
> (67% coverage)
>
> Clarification
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOKORI/KOCHODIN
>
> LOTUBAE
>
> 22,129
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KAPEDO/NAPEITOM
>
> NGILUKIA
>
> 4,356
>
>
>
> 82
>
> TKN-4
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KATILIA
>
> KATILIA
>
> 9,513
>
> 223.315
>
>
>
> 212,149,249
>
> (60% coverage)
>
> Clarification
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KATILIA
>
> PARKATI
>
> 11,455
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KALAPATA
>
> KALAPATA
>
> 10,869
>
>
>
> TURKANA
>
> KALAPATA
>
> LOPEROT
>
> 7,344
>
>
>
> 84
>
> TKN-1
>
> TURKANA
>
> KAPEDO/NAPEITOM
>
> NADOME
>
> 3,653
>
> 24.684
>
> 24,683,999
>
>
>
> 85
>
> TKN-6
>
> TURKANA
>
> LOKICHAR
>
> NAPOSUMURU
>
> 6,034
>
> 25.6
>
>
>
> 25,600,000
>
> 87
>
> WAJ-6
>
> WAJIR
>
> BATALU
>
> BUNA
>
> 3,465
>
> 51.493
>
>
> 51,492,999
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> BATALU
>
> KUROW
>
> 3,129
>
>
> 89
>
> WAJ-2
>
> WAJIR
>
> KHOROF/HARAR
>
> RIBA
>
> 11,042
>
> 50.496
>
> 47,971,199
>
>
>
> 91
>
> WAJ-5
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> ELBEN
>
> MANSA
>
> 12,247
>
> 87.429
>
>
>
> 87,428,999
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> SARMAN
>
> DUNTO
>
> 10,733
>
>
>
> 92
>
> WAJ-4
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> ELDAS
>
> KILKILEY
>
> 4,107
>
> 47.673
>
>
>
> 47,672,999
>
>
>
> WAJIR
>
> ELNUR/TULA TULA
>
> LAKOLE
>
> 9,066
>
>
>
> 98
>
> WPOK-6
>
> WEST POKOT
>
> CHEPARERIA
>
> SHALPOGH
>
> 4,248
>
> 5.841
>
>
> 5,841,000
>
>
> 99
>
> WPOK-11
>
>
>
> WEST POKOT
>
> ALALE
>
> APUKE
>
> 1,442
>
> 24.696
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> WEST POKOT
>
> KIWAWA
>
> LOPET
>
> 2,300
>
>
>
>
>
> TOTAL
>
> 1,182,081,961
>
> 385,141,000
>
>
>
>
> Annex 2:  Counties and number of Internet-ready Schools to be connected in
> 2016/17
>
> Lotting of the Counties and number of Internet-ready Schools
>
> Lot 1:
>
> Lot 2:
>
> Lot 3:
>
> Lot 4:
>
> Lot 5:
>
> Lot 6:
>
> Lot 7:
>
> Lot 8:
>
> Lot 9:
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> County
>
> Sch
>
> Garissa
>
> 3
>
> Mandera
>
> 7
>
> Wajir
>
> 4
>
> Samburu
>
> 3
>
> Marsabit
>
> 4
>
> Turkana
>
> 4
>
> W. Pokot
>
> 7
>
> Baringo
>
> 10
>
> Narok
>
> 10
>
> Tana River
>
> 2
>
> Nairobi
>
> 39
>
> Isiolo
>
> 4
>
> Laikipia
>
> 11
>
> Meru
>
>   19
>
> Elegeo Marakwet
>
> 10
>
> Trans-Nzoia
>
> 18
>
> Kericho
>
> 21
>
> Migori
>
> 11
>
> Lamu
>
> 5
>
> Murang'a
>
> 35
>
> Tharaka Nithi
>
> 14
>
> Nyandarua
>
> 5
>
> Embu
>
> 24
>
> Uasin Gishu
>
> 17
>
> Bungoma
>
> 54
>
> Kisumu
>
> 23
>
> Homa Bay
>
> 15
>
> Kilifi
>
> 13
>
> Kajiado
>
> 8
>
> Kitui
>
> 31
>
> Nakuru
>
> 35
>
> Nyeri
>
> 29
>
> Kakamega
>
> 55
>
> Busia
>
> 24
>
> Vihiga
>
> 20
>
> Siaya
>
> 24
>
> Mombasa
>
> 12
>
>
>
>
>
> Makueni
>
> 26
>
> Kiambu
>
> 45
>
> Kirinyaga
>
> 22
>
> Nandi
>
>   28
>
>
>
>
>
> Bomet
>
> 10
>
> Kisii
>
> 24
>
> Kwale
>
> 7
>
>
>
>
>
> Taita. Taveta
>
> 14
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nyamira
>
> 20
>
> Machakos
>
> 69
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sub-total
>
> 111
>
>
>
> 89
>
>
>
> 93
>
>
>
> 99
>
>
>
> 99
>
>
>
> 114
>
>
>
> 103
>
>
>
> 84
>
>
>
> 104
>
> TOTAL NO.
>
> SCHOOLS
>
> 896
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Rachel Alwala
> Assistant Director/Communications and External Affairs
> Communications Authority of Kenya
> PO Box 14448
> Nairobi 00800
>
> Tel:  +254 703042000
> Email:  alwala at ca.go.ke
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/otieno.barrack%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for
> people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.



-- 
Barrack O. Otieno
+254721325277
+254733206359
Skype: barrack.otieno
PGP ID: 0x2611D86A




More information about the KICTANet mailing list