[kictanet] kictanet Digest, Vol 116, Issue 24

Thu Jan 5 13:33:33 EAT 2017

Kudos for this.

We (ICT practitioners) were certainly being turned into some laughing stock for some of the sentiments that were expressed ostensibly by ICT experts, including our own CS (my friend Joe) who to say the least either for lack of clarity or otherwise chose to express himself unfaithful to his calling and training.

Washington Odhiambo was spot-on in his comments a couple of days ago. Some of us submitted memoranda to the elections ICT working group and expressed very similar sentiments. Like I said last time as a postmortem to the last general elections; Technology didn't fail us, it is people who failed us......enough said.

Regards,

Aquinas

Sent from my iPad,
Powered by: LANTech (Africa) Limited Unified Communications System

> On 5 Jan 2017, at 1:12 PM, "kictanet-request at lists.kictanet.or.ke" <kictanet-request at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>
> Send kictanet mailing list submissions to
>        kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        kictanet-request at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        kictanet-owner at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of kictanet digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: ICT Experts Brush Off Manual IEBC Back UpSystem
>      (Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu)
>   2. Re: ICT Experts Brush Off Manual IEBC Back UpSystem
>      (Barrack Otieno)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:09:12 +0300
> From: Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu <chemukoechk at gmail.com>
> To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Experts Brush Off Manual IEBC Back
>        UpSystem
> Message-ID:
>        <CAApgMtykUCOR0ighLZn0ux6z-RSnfC8_APVVN+ipNwpYzHjtsQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear Listers ,
>
> Below is a link to an article in regards to KictaNET's stand on the above
> matter.
>
> http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/mobile/article/2000228773/ict-experts-brush-off-manual-iebc-back-up-system
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu
> Tel: 0718181644
> Skype: Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu
> LinkedIn: Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu
> Twitter: @Chemu_koech
>
> On 30 Dec 2016 12:02, "Odhiambo Washington via kictanet" <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>
>> Dear Listers,
>>
>> I am at that position where I feel very lost. In fact, I feel like I am
>> quite detached from the reality.
>>
>> All along, I have keenly considered this matter that seems to have divided
>> the country down the middle: *Manual Backup* during the 2017 voting
>> process. From the Jubilee/govt side this is a do or die and so it must be
>> there. This govt side seems hell-bent on confusing the masses, as well as
>> the experts like the ICT Community. From the Opposition side, the agenda
>> seems to be very clear - that of ensuring integrity of the Voters Register
>> and stopping 'ghost voters' from ever casting their votes.
>>
>> That brings us to the famous acronyms - BVI (Biometric Voter Register) /
>> BVI (Biometric Voter Identification).
>> Having been to a Voter Registration Centre (later to become a Polling
>> Station) to register as a voter, I did look at the equipment in use for the
>> registration process. I saw the laptop which was fitted with a camera and
>> fingerprints scanner. All these require power to run. I did not dwell on
>> how they were powered, but probably there was a battery backup somewhere
>> (besides the electricity) given that they needed to run for a whole day for
>> several days during the voter registration process. When it comes to the
>> Elections, they only need to run for about 11 hours. My point here is that
>> of *Backup Power* should it be that there's electricity blackout and the
>> built-in batteries can't last the whole day. That backup is very important.
>>
>> However, I did not see any piece of equipment which could suggest that the
>> equipment in use required any form of connectivity back to some central
>> server in order to function! Which now brings me to the currently national
>> debate - Manual Backup during the Poll Day. What is it? Was the CS honest
>> with his presentation before the Senate/Amos Wako committee yesterday? Does
>> the CS himself really believe in the content of his presentation? I am
>> asking that because I watched him and I don't believe him. I actually think
>> he mislead the committee, and hence the nation at large.
>>
>> Someone please prove me wrong. I am at that point where I believe that the
>> BVR/BVI does NOT require any form of connectivity and so this Manual Backup
>> being touted by the ruling coalition side, strongly supported by  the ICT
>> CS is a big lie. WHY?
>>
>> My very first answer: Simply put, *when there was no requirement for a
>> manual backup during voter registration, it goes without saying that there
>> is NO NEED for on the polling day.*
>>
>>
>> 1. For the issue that is in contention - BVR (used for BVI during polling)
>> - this is a database that can be (and should be) statically stored on the
>> equipment for each polling station. We are not supposed to rely on the
>> Mobile Network to access this voters database. And every polling station
>> can have two/three laptops/Biometrics scanner/Backup batteries to ensure
>> that the voter identification doesn't fail.
>> Some excuse has been fronted about some voters being mechanics, such that
>> their fingerprints wouldn't be recognized by the BVI systems hence need for
>> manual identification. My take on that is that every voter must carry their
>> voter's card on that day. The clerks can check that card number against the
>> electronic system - enter it, and it will bring the person's picture, ID
>> number, etc and let him cast his ballot.
>>
>> 2. For electronics results transmission (ERT), this is not even necessary
>> in the first place. We can have the results collated/announced at the
>> tallying centres after being certified - forms 36A, and such. However, if
>> the ERT must be done, the data footprint is so tiny that a 2G network can
>> be used. Besides, it can be an SMS based system, which doesn't require 3G
>> or VSAT. The results data isn't that large - it can't be in Megabytes to be
>> sincere. Well, VSAT can be used if they MUST, but this is after the voting
>> process itself is complete, has nothing to do with BVI.
>>
>> The ERT and the BVR/BVI are two distinct systems. That is what I want to
>> believe. The ERT gets feedback from a manual process - of voters casting
>> their vote, clerks/agents counting, verifying, and certifying, filling
>> requisite forms then communicating the same via some customized phones
>> which are programmed to communicate to a backend system. Am I right on
>> that??
>>
>> Now the big question here is, where do we need this much touted manual
>> backup where network connectivity is being used as the major reason???
>>
>> (a) Citing terrorism and the possibility of Al Shabaab knocking off base
>> stations seems like well thought out lie meant to cover our eyes! If they
>> attacked an area, I doubt there will be voting in the 1st place.
>>     And even so, the network connectivity is not required for BVI so
>> there is no disenfranchising anyone if there is no manual backup (whatever
>> that is).
>>
>> (b) Citing hacking is neither here nor there for a BVR/BVI system because
>> it's not being accessed live during the voting. It's a static database,
>> unique to the polling station, resident on the laptop used by the clerks.
>> The only hacking that can be done then can only be by an "insider". Quoting
>> Victor Kapiyo from Social Media, "*I guess it's a question of trust.
>> Trust in systems and in trustworthy people to do the right thing. For
>> M-Pesa, or KCSE results, we trust both. For IEBC, I guess the jury is still
>> out*."
>>
>> The main issue is not allowing the dead voters to rise again to vote in
>> the presidential vote, then disappear. So the important component here is
>> the BVR/BVI, the credibility of the register and hence the vote.
>>
>> At what point does the BVI system require this connectivity they are
>> talking about, which then necessitates the so called "manual backup"?
>>
>> Did the CS ICT lie to the Senate?? Did the CAK lie to the Senate in
>> supporting the lie from the CS??
>>
>> There is insincerity in this whole debate about 'manual backup' and the
>> ICT community seems to either support it or is simply lost in the pool of
>> confusion being peddled by politicians.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
>> Nairobi,KE
>> +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223
>> "Oh, the cruft."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>
>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
>> mailman/options/kictanet/chemukoechk%40gmail.com
>>
>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>
>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20170105/a961f8f2/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:23:27 +0300
> From: Barrack Otieno <otieno.barrack at gmail.com>
> To: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] ICT Experts Brush Off Manual IEBC Back
>        UpSystem
> Message-ID:
>        <CAKX6dsGBpGkmM0H6QrnynngoNOpqxbR+uUJ4SHiXp=mCs9zYzA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> ?The employment of technology in elections management is meant to
> address questions of integrity of the election and efficiency in
> transmission of the results,? explains KICTAnet in part.
>
> KICTAnet further states that once the IEBC system has been procured,
> it is possible for the technical committee to agree on the best way of
> mitigating potential system vulnerabilities.
>
> It is my hope that we will put in place all the necessary measures to
> avoid the debacle we experienced in the last elections. I hope as
> professionals we will walk the talk when given a chance to provide
> leadership.
>
> Regards
>
> On 1/5/17, Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu via kictanet
> <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>> Dear Listers ,
>>
>> Below is a link to an article in regards to KictaNET's stand on the above
>> matter.
>>
>> http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/mobile/article/2000228773/ict-experts-brush-off-manual-iebc-back-up-system
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu
>> Tel: 0718181644
>> Skype: Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu
>> LinkedIn: Rosemary Koech-Kimwatu
>> Twitter: @Chemu_koech
>>
>> On 30 Dec 2016 12:02, "Odhiambo Washington via kictanet" <
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Listers,
>>>
>>> I am at that position where I feel very lost. In fact, I feel like I am
>>> quite detached from the reality.
>>>
>>> All along, I have keenly considered this matter that seems to have
>>> divided
>>> the country down the middle: *Manual Backup* during the 2017 voting
>>> process. From the Jubilee/govt side this is a do or die and so it must be
>>> there. This govt side seems hell-bent on confusing the masses, as well as
>>> the experts like the ICT Community. From the Opposition side, the agenda
>>> seems to be very clear - that of ensuring integrity of the Voters
>>> Register
>>> and stopping 'ghost voters' from ever casting their votes.
>>>
>>> That brings us to the famous acronyms - BVI (Biometric Voter Register) /
>>> BVI (Biometric Voter Identification).
>>> Having been to a Voter Registration Centre (later to become a Polling
>>> Station) to register as a voter, I did look at the equipment in use for
>>> the
>>> registration process. I saw the laptop which was fitted with a camera and
>>> fingerprints scanner. All these require power to run. I did not dwell on
>>> how they were powered, but probably there was a battery backup somewhere
>>> (besides the electricity) given that they needed to run for a whole day
>>> for
>>> several days during the voter registration process. When it comes to the
>>> Elections, they only need to run for about 11 hours. My point here is
>>> that
>>> of *Backup Power* should it be that there's electricity blackout and the
>>> built-in batteries can't last the whole day. That backup is very
>>> important.
>>>
>>> However, I did not see any piece of equipment which could suggest that
>>> the
>>> equipment in use required any form of connectivity back to some central
>>> server in order to function! Which now brings me to the currently
>>> national
>>> debate - Manual Backup during the Poll Day. What is it? Was the CS honest
>>> with his presentation before the Senate/Amos Wako committee yesterday?
>>> Does
>>> the CS himself really believe in the content of his presentation? I am
>>> asking that because I watched him and I don't believe him. I actually
>>> think
>>> he mislead the committee, and hence the nation at large.
>>>
>>> Someone please prove me wrong. I am at that point where I believe that
>>> the
>>> BVR/BVI does NOT require any form of connectivity and so this Manual
>>> Backup
>>> being touted by the ruling coalition side, strongly supported by  the ICT
>>> CS is a big lie. WHY?
>>>
>>> My very first answer: Simply put, *when there was no requirement for a
>>> manual backup during voter registration, it goes without saying that
>>> there
>>> is NO NEED for on the polling day.*
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. For the issue that is in contention - BVR (used for BVI during
>>> polling)
>>> - this is a database that can be (and should be) statically stored on the
>>> equipment for each polling station. We are not supposed to rely on the
>>> Mobile Network to access this voters database. And every polling station
>>> can have two/three laptops/Biometrics scanner/Backup batteries to ensure
>>> that the voter identification doesn't fail.
>>> Some excuse has been fronted about some voters being mechanics, such that
>>> their fingerprints wouldn't be recognized by the BVI systems hence need
>>> for
>>> manual identification. My take on that is that every voter must carry
>>> their
>>> voter's card on that day. The clerks can check that card number against
>>> the
>>> electronic system - enter it, and it will bring the person's picture, ID
>>> number, etc and let him cast his ballot.
>>>
>>> 2. For electronics results transmission (ERT), this is not even necessary
>>> in the first place. We can have the results collated/announced at the
>>> tallying centres after being certified - forms 36A, and such. However, if
>>> the ERT must be done, the data footprint is so tiny that a 2G network can
>>> be used. Besides, it can be an SMS based system, which doesn't require 3G
>>> or VSAT. The results data isn't that large - it can't be in Megabytes to
>>> be
>>> sincere. Well, VSAT can be used if they MUST, but this is after the
>>> voting
>>> process itself is complete, has nothing to do with BVI.
>>>
>>> The ERT and the BVR/BVI are two distinct systems. That is what I want to
>>> believe. The ERT gets feedback from a manual process - of voters casting
>>> their vote, clerks/agents counting, verifying, and certifying, filling
>>> requisite forms then communicating the same via some customized phones
>>> which are programmed to communicate to a backend system. Am I right on
>>> that??
>>>
>>> Now the big question here is, where do we need this much touted manual
>>> backup where network connectivity is being used as the major reason???
>>>
>>> (a) Citing terrorism and the possibility of Al Shabaab knocking off base
>>> stations seems like well thought out lie meant to cover our eyes! If they
>>> attacked an area, I doubt there will be voting in the 1st place.
>>>     And even so, the network connectivity is not required for BVI so
>>> there is no disenfranchising anyone if there is no manual backup
>>> (whatever
>>> that is).
>>>
>>> (b) Citing hacking is neither here nor there for a BVR/BVI system because
>>> it's not being accessed live during the voting. It's a static database,
>>> unique to the polling station, resident on the laptop used by the clerks.
>>> The only hacking that can be done then can only be by an "insider".
>>> Quoting
>>> Victor Kapiyo from Social Media, "*I guess it's a question of trust.
>>> Trust in systems and in trustworthy people to do the right thing. For
>>> M-Pesa, or KCSE results, we trust both. For IEBC, I guess the jury is
>>> still
>>> out*."
>>>
>>> The main issue is not allowing the dead voters to rise again to vote in
>>> the presidential vote, then disappear. So the important component here is
>>> the BVR/BVI, the credibility of the register and hence the vote.
>>>
>>> At what point does the BVI system require this connectivity they are
>>> talking about, which then necessitates the so called "manual backup"?
>>>
>>> Did the CS ICT lie to the Senate?? Did the CAK lie to the Senate in
>>> supporting the lie from the CS??
>>>
>>> There is insincerity in this whole debate about 'manual backup' and the
>>> ICT community seems to either support it or is simply lost in the pool of
>>> confusion being peddled by politicians.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
>>> Nairobi,KE
>>> +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223
>>> "Oh, the cruft."
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> kictanet mailing list
>>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>>
>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/
>>> mailman/options/kictanet/chemukoechk%40gmail.com
>>>
>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and
>>> development.
>>>
>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and
>>> bandwidth,
>>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
>
> --
> Barrack O. Otieno
> +254721325277
> +254733206359
> Skype: barrack.otieno
> PGP ID: 0x2611D86A
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of kictanet Digest, Vol 116, Issue 24
> *****************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE:

This e-mail message and any attachments are intended to be received only by persons entitled to receive the confidential information it may contain. E-mail messages to clients of LANTech ( Africa) Limited may contain information that is confidential and legally privileged. Please do not read, copy, forward, or store this message unless you are an intended recipient of it. If you have received this message in error, please forward it to the sender and delete it completely from your computer system.

 Emails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. LANTech (Africa) Limited does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this email if the same is found to have been altered or manipulated. The contents and opinions expressed in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of LANTech (Africa) Limited. LANTech (Africa) Limited disclaims any liability to the fullest extent permissible by law for any consequences that may arise from the contents of this email including but not limited to personal opinions, malicious and/or defamatory information and data/codes that may compromise or damage the integrity of the recipient's information technology systems.