[kictanet] ICT Authority request on Connected Kenya

[Brian Munyao Longwe]

Hi all,

This is a positive step. As others have pointed out - the most important
factor is relevance, followed by usability (user interface, simple steps
etc) and of course the all important factor of accessibility - both in
terms of site/service responsiveness as well as last mile/end user device
options.

In 2005 (yes, 2005!) AfrISPA comissioned a study (
http://www.internetafricanews.com/afrispa/strategy.pdf)  on strategies to
increase internet growth. This study was conducted by our own Muriuki
Mureithi via Summit Strategies and came up with some illuminating facts. A
study of informal businesses in Kenya's Kariobangi Light industries
revealed that most of the businesses were aware of the internet, could use
a computer and most importantly - could afford dedicated internet access at
the prices of the day! The main reason why they didn't have, want or need
internet access was that there was no content that they found relevant
available. At the top of their list of required content was government
services!

I hope that this debate brings our more ideas and proposals on how
Government can better serve the populace.

Best regards,

Brian

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Nanjira Sambuli via kictanet <
kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:

> Good points raised thus far.
>
> iHub Research conducted a study in 2014, assessing how ICTs
> facilitate/hinder two-way interaction between citizens and governments in
> four key areas: access to information, tracking corruption,
> monitoring/accessing government service delivery, and citizen
> participation.
>
> The study was carried out in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. In Kenya, we
> looked at Nairobi and Nakuru (where infrastructure to support access to
> eGovernment services exists to some extent), and very interesting insights
> emerged. A one page summary on the study’s findings and recommendations is
> accessible here <http://www.ihub.co.ke/ict4gov>. The full report can be
> downloaded here <http://www.ihub.co.ke/downloads/ict_4_gov_report.pdf>;
> the report is in an easy-to-read format, highlighting citizen’s voices and
> anecdotes on their interactions with ICTs).
>
> Key points:
> 1. *SMS and radio are still king! *To disseminate information, raise
> awareness to many, and especially in rural areas, those two mechanisms
> remain the most effective. And, as Grace pointed out, if SMS queries can be
> sent at no cost to users, then many citizens are likely to leverage them.
> *Recommendation*: Non-Internet based ICTs used in governance such as
> mobile phones and radios need to be integrated more in ICT and governance
> initiatives since they are the most widely used and most accessible.
> 2. *User experience on government websites:* "*Citizens only visit
> governance-related sites that are a priority for their needs at a specific
> time, and even then, they reported that the websites are clunky and ugly.
> User experience is not a key factor in the creation of these websites.* “
> The iTax platform and KRA website were a common reference on this.
> *Recommendation*: embrace user experience considerations
> <http://www.ihub.co.ke/uxlab> before deploying or upgrading ICT tools.
> 3. *Design- reality gap:* "*citizen consultations do not seem to inform
> the creation or prioritization of eGovernment efforts.” *
> *Recommendation: *The design of ICT initiatives in governance that are
> meant to facilitate two-way interaction between citizens and government
> should include the input of citizens who are intended to use them.
> *4. *A major hurdle faced in the deployment and use of ICT tools in
> governance is *a lack of trust in the government*, as well as *apathy
> among citizens *that is brought about by perceived government failure to
> respond to complaints or issues raised along various governance lines. As
> one FGD participant put it: *“If my going to the office, physical
> presence, does not inspire the [government] official to act on a problem,
> how will communication using their websites or Facebook be different?” *
> *Recommendation: *eGovernment services need to activate interaction and
> feedback mechanisms, including transparent response mechanisms to queries
> raised or complaints. (Government officials indicated that resources
> to facilitate this are often lacking).
> 5. Lack of involvement of citizens (who are the primary target/end users
> of most of the ICT tools for governance) in the development of ICTs for
> governance leads to poor prioritization of the citizens’ needs. Awareness
> creation about the existence of these tools, why and how they should be
> used is not done by the implementers of the tools.
>
> We hope that the study’s findings and recommendations prove useful.
>
>
>
>
> On 18 Jan 2016, at 13:03, kictanet-request at lists.kictanet.or.ke wrote:
>
>  ICT Authority request on Connected Kenya
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Nanjira Sambuli
> Research Lead
>
>
>
>
>
> iHub <http://www.ihub.co.ke/> | Research <http://www.ihub.co.ke/research>
>  | UXLab <http://www.ihub.co.ke/uxlab> | Consulting
> <http://www.ihub.co.ke/consulting>
> *Mobile:* +254722481566
> *Skype:* nanjirasambuli | *Twitter:* @NiNanjira
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/blongwe%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20160118/33287987/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature_logo.png
Type: image/png
Size: 361 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20160118/33287987/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature_line.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20160118/33287987/attachment.gif>