[kictanet] Planned amendments bode ill for Communications Authority

Wed Oct 21 10:57:45 EAT 2015

Ali, Colleagues,

This is purely a leadership issue Ali, fortunately there is a time and
season for everything. The current stewards of the sector will be
remembered for their deeds or misdeeds. The same laws will  be amended
some day by another parliament that is full of wisdom not numbers.

Regards

On 10/21/15, Ali Hussein via kictanet <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
> Mwendwa
>
> Thanks for bringing this up.
>
> On a light note..Does my brother Walu still have a job at the Uni? :-)
>
> Seriously though, this sort of thing just takes us back 10+ years to the
> days of KANU.
>
> Ministry - Policy & Leadership
> Regulator - Regulate
>
> How difficult is that?
>
> I recall that after the new constitution was promulgated the hopes of the
> industry was that we will have a more robust and independent Regulator
> fashioned around the US Regulator - The Federal Communications Commission.
>
> It is my humble view that we owe it to the world to set the highest
> standards for Regulation & Policy Formulation in the world as we are now a
> recognised leader in innovation in the mobile space. Instead of the
> Executive looking to surround itself with more regulatorY powers they would
> do better to recognise their role of formulating & guiding policy &
> leadership to move this country forward in the ICT Sector.
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Ali Hussein
> ali at hussein.me.ke
>
> +254 713 601113
> Twitter: @AliHKassim
> Skype: Abu-Jomo
> LinkedIn: http//ke.linkedin.com/in/alihkassim
> Blog: www.alyhussein.com
>
>> On Oct 21, 2015, at 10:01 AM, Mwendwa Kivuva via kictanet
>> <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Walubengo seems to have captured the controversial issues surrounding the
>> new KICA amendments where the executive is unsurprising powers from the
>> "independent" Communications Authority. The emphasis of the community is
>> that these amendments are unconstitutional and will not be allowed to
>> pass.
>>
>> read on ...
>> http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/-/2274560/2921856/-/xolkx9z/-/index.html
>> <http://www.nation.co.ke/oped/blogs/dot9/walubengo/-/2274560/2921856/-/xolkx9z/-/index.html>
>>
>> There is a proposed bill, the Miscellaneous Amendment Bill 164 of 2015
>> <http://kenyalaw.org/kl/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/bills/2015/StatuteLaw__MiscellaneousAmendmens_Bill_164of2015.pdf>
>> that proposes to move most of the communications regulatory powers to the
>> Cabinet secretary.
>>
>> It is not clear why the Executive suddenly wants to become the regulator
>> in a day and age when global practice seems to be to keep the two as
>> separate as possible.
>>
>> In seeking to understand the rationale, one needs to look at the
>> 'Memorandum of Objects and Reason’ section, which states as follows:
>>
>> ‘The Bill seeks to amend the Kenya Information And Communications Act,
>> 1998  section 2 of 1998) so as firstly to align it with the Competitions
>> Act, 2014 in respect of the criteria for being a dominant market
>>
>> undertaking and secondly to harmonize the regulation making power so that
>> it is exercised by the Cabinet Secretary in consultation with the
>> Authority’.
>>
>> Two aims seem to drive the new amendments. One is to put the contentious
>> issue of dominance under the Competition Authority rather than the
>> Communications Authority. The second is to enhance the Cabinet Secretary’s
>> role in communication regulatory matters.
>>
>> For those with a little bit of communications history, it is easy to see
>> the deliberate shift towards the old days when communications regulation
>> was strictly under the Minister of Transport and Communications.
>>
>> In those days, prior to the Kenya Communications Act 1998, the then Kenya
>> Posts and Telecommunications Corporation (KPTC), a fully-owned government
>> parastatal, was the father, mother and grandparent of all regulatory
>> matters in Kenya.
>>
>> The performance of regulation then is well documented and it was clearly a
>> case study in ‘how not to regulate’.
>>
>> So it still beats all logic, despite the intended rationale for the
>> amendments, why a modern, self-declared digital government would want to
>> drag the whole country back to the so-called dark days.
>>
>> 'DEPARTMENT OF THE ICT MINISTRY'
>>
>> Indeed, the Kenyan Constitution (2010) anticipates and clearly states that
>> we should have a more independent regulator than what we have always had.
>>
>> As stated in Article 34: Section (5)-:
>>
>> ‘ Parliament shall enact legislation that provides for the establishment
>> of a body, which shall—
>>
>> (a) be independent of control by government, political interests or
>> commercial interests;
>>
>> (b) reflect the interests of all sections of the society; and
>>
>> (c) set media standards and regulate and monitor compliance with those
>> standards.’
>>
>> Several court battles have recently been filed against the current
>> regulator simply because their decisions, however well-intentioned were
>> deemed not to have been undertaken by an independent regulator as
>> envisioned in the new constitution.
>>
>> Why, then, would the government deliberately plan to set itself up for
>> more of these court battles by proposing amendments that clearly make the
>> regulator a department of the ICT Ministry and therefore not independent
>> from the Executive?
>>
>> JUST WIND UP THE CA
>>
>> Most of the proposed amendments are about replacing the role of the
>> regulator with that of the Cabinet secretary by inserting the words ‘The
>> Cabinet secretary in consultation with the Communication Authority shall
>> make regulations for…’
>>
>> As an example, see Section 5(b)(5)  on ‘Freedom of the media’.  The new
>> proposals say that  ‘The Cabinet secretary in consultation with the
>> Communication Authority shall make regulations for the better carrying out
>> of the provisions in this section’.
>>
>> In Section 27(d) on ‘SIM cards’, the new proposals say that ‘The Cabinet
>> secretary in consultation with the Communication Authority may make
>> regulations with respect to SIM Card registration, storage, retention,
>> transfers….’
>>
>> There are many other amendments of similar a nature, and the clear message
>> is that the regulator cannot make operational decisions unless in
>> consultation with the minister.
>>
>> Indeed, one could argue that it is effectively the other way round - the
>> Minister making the decision in consultation with the regulator.
>>
>> If the famous voting machine in Parliament, otherwise known as the
>> "tyranny of numbers", is anything to go by, these amendments are likely to
>> pass.
>>
>> However, the government should do Kenyans a favour thereafter and wind up
>> the Communications Authority of Kenya, since its role will essentially
>> have been absorbed by the Ministry.
>>
>> Mr Walubengo is a lecturer at the Multimedia University of Kenya's Faculty
>> of Computing and IT. Twitter: @jwalu  Email: jwalubengo at mmu.ac.ke
>> <mailto:jwalubengo at mmu.ac.ke>
>> ______________________
>> Mwendwa Kivuva, Nairobi, Kenya
>>
>> "There are some men who lift the age they inhabit, till all men walk on
>> higher ground in that lifetime." - Maxwell Anderson
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>
>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com
>>
>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and
>> development.
>>
>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
>

-- 
Barrack O. Otieno
+254721325277
+254-20-2498789
Skype: barrack.otieno
http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/