[kictanet] Our Response to Systematic ICT Systems Failure at IEBC

Mark Mwangi mwangy at gmail.com
Tue Mar 12 18:42:44 EAT 2013


For starters the digital system was never meant to be the official system
and for trust purposes, was meant to be for accountability purposes. I may
be wrong on this but I have not seen any evidence of the situation being
contrary to this.

There was thus no reversion per say only abandonment of one of the parallel
systems.


On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Edith Adera <eadera at idrc.ca> wrote:

>  Harry,****
>
> ** **
>
> Not sure you were in Kenya or buried your head in the sand!****
>
> ** **
>
> It’s a fact that the system did not work and IEBC had to revert to the
> manual system as reported by the Chair of the IEBC on TV.****
>
> ** **
>
> We need to learn to tell the truth as a country and confront our issues.
> Someone suggested on this list, can’t remember who,  that as an ICT
> industry an audit should be carried out so we know what went wrong and
> learn for the future.****
>
> ** **
>
> Why do we always turn to the easy targets….tribalism, partisan interests
> etc when hard questions are asked?****
>
> ** **
>
> Edith****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* kictanet [mailto:kictanet-bounces+eadera=
> idrc.ca at lists.kictanet.or.ke] *On Behalf Of *Harry Delano
> *Sent:* March 12, 2013 3:22 PM
> *To:* Edith Adera
> *Cc:* KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
> *Subject:* [kictanet] Our Response to Systematic ICT Systems Failure at
> IEBC****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Aye..!****
>
> ** **
>
> Could someone please aver what the furor was all about on this list when
> systems failed at IEBC last week. I thought it was so that****
>
> we could address systemic issues in that part of the election process..?
> Please someone correct me, but I seem to be settling on****
>
> this conclusion that we collectively only raise hue and cry when the
> system(s) are perceived to be working  against “us”, or not in ****
>
> “our” interests – whichever side of divide each one of us sits. Once they
> serve ‘our’ interests, we quickly move on.. So where is ****
>
> posterity in all this..? A pattern emerges where well calculated
> intellectual arguments everywhere nowadays, that  thinly  veil and ****
>
> mask the real motives in us. We completely bury our heads in the ground
> and deny that we have deeply rooted issues that stem****
>
> from tribe, class etc and as a result,  we are caught up in this  vicious
> cycle that we cannot seem to free ourselves from and which ****
>
> clouds our entire vision as a nation. Who will free us, if we do not take
> initiative ourselves..? How and when will we as a nation ****
>
> confront this ‘monster’ head on, by first of all acknowledging it exists.
> Then moving to deal with it. Can this list be at the forefront ****
>
> of it..?****
>
> ** **
>
> If so,  let’s start now..****
>
> ** **
>
> Harry****
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/mwangy%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>



-- 
Regards,

Mark Mwangi

markmwangi.me.ke
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20130312/7f335e7b/attachment.htm>


More information about the KICTANet mailing list