[kictanet] Has the ICT Sector Failed?

[Daudi Were]

On 6 March 2013 09:56, Agosta Liko <agostal at gmail.com> wrote:

> about the RFP ...
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
> THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) IS THE EXCLUSIVE, CONFIDENTIAL,
> PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF THE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ELECTORAL SYSTEMS
> (IFES). IT MAY NOT BE COPIED, TRANSMITTED, OR DISCLOSED BY ANY MEANS
> WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF IFES . BY ACCEPTING A COPY HEREOF,
> RECIPIENT AGREES TO (I) BE BOUND BY THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED
> HEREIN (INCLUDING BUT NO T LIMITED TO THE CONFIDENTIALITY PROVISONS), (II)
> USE THE RFP (AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS) SOLE LY FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES AND
> FOR RESPONDING TO THIS RFP, AND (III) RETURN OR DESTROY THE RFP (AND ANY
> RELATED DOCUMENTS) UPON IFES REQUEST OR UPON YOUR DECISION NOT TO RESPOND
> TO THIS RFP
>
> ----------------------------------------


Liko,

The RFP maybe belong to IFES (and that can be disputed), the election and
the electoral process belongs to Kenyans.
We not only have the right, we have the RESPONSIBILITY to question what is
going on with the ICT systems at Bomas.
Since you keep telling us to expect things to fail and then expect them to
be fixed why don't you tell us WHAT failed and WHAT is being fixed. Simple
enough. If you don't want to tell us what is failing and what is being
fixed then tell us WHY you can not tell us. Is it that you don't know, in
which case you should join is trying to find out WHAT is going on.

The integrity of our election is much more important that a warning IN CAPS
about which obscure company owns which document.

We ask these questions are patriots, as concerned citizens who want our
electoral commission to succeed. Obscure confidentially clauses or not.

D
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20130306/d6c5ce3d/attachment.htm>