[kictanet] CCK shuts down illegal broadcast transmitters

Gilda Odera godera at skyweb.co.ke
Mon Feb 4 12:11:32 EAT 2013


And I wish to see the DG move swiftly on all other such issues so he is not seen to be partisan. Over to you DG. I am looking forward to reading more updates from Christopher Wambua this week on the various such activities you will undertake this week. Let us get busy.........especially with those who are hoarding frequencies. Why are they still holding them? And Wambua can you name and shame them today?   

Gilda Odera
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Odhiambo Washington 
  To: godera at skyweb.co.ke 
  Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions 
  Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 11:54 AM
  Subject: Re: [kictanet] CCK shuts down illegal broadcast transmitters


  CCK was simply keeping off the sacred cows. Don't be fooled. We still have sacred cows even in this new constitutional dispensation. The untouchables will all soon be touchable. It's just a matter of time, usually.
  It's common knowledge that there are others (in govt) who are holding/hoarding frequencies too, but CCK is not  yet talking about them.



  On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Paul Roy <roykoikai at gmail.com> wrote:

    Politics politics and more politics. It took CCK over 5 years to realize that RMS was using illegal frequencies? Surely CCK had a political motive to act now especially around the election time. If RMS has been operating illegal frequencies for all this time, then someone at CCK needs to answer some questions and step aside for investigations.





    On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:44 AM, George Nyabuga <george at afrinic.net> wrote:

      I find it funny that people are reading 'politics' here when it is clear that Royal Media Services had clearly broken the law, 'grabbed' frequencies and acted with 'impunity'. Although I am a great supporter of the freedom of the media, and right to information, CCK acted within the law by shutting down the transmitters. I also find it odd that Justice David Majanja issued the order restraining the Communications Commission of Kenya from interfering with 18transmitters on Sunday. I hope such court services can be extended to the 'common people' who continue to suffer injustice. Perhaps CCK can also tell us how many 'legitimate' frequencies Royal Media Services has besides  62 FM ones( is this figure correct) it reportedly 'hoards'. Why does Royal Media Services think it's above the law? I find it absolutely ludicrous that this can be allowed to continue, and that some (especially (even senior) politicians) think the shut down is politically motivated.




      Dr George Nyabuga                                                 Tel:   +230 403 51 00
      Head, Communications and PR, AFRINIC           Fax:  +230 466 67 58
      george at afrinic.net - www.afrinic.net
       
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Please join us at the Africa Internet Summit, Lusaka, Zambia, 9 – 21 June 2013
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


      On Feb 3, 2013, at 11:46 PM, "Grace Mutung'u (Bomu)" <nmutungu at gmail.com> wrote:


        and  then came the court orders...on a good sunday!

        2013/2/3, Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga at hotmail.com>:


          Finally!
          CCK has taken the right direction and should not be cowed by all the noise
          in
          the blogsphere. The law must be enforced regardless of the timing. An
          illegality is an illegality. Kindly let us not politicize the matter.
          Enforcement of this judgment does not in any way relate to SK supporting
          CORD.
          This should be seen as a pure enforcement of a broadcast requirement.



          Broadcast
          licences have conditions and CCK does warn against their breaching.
          For example CCK is usually clear on power of transmitter, the radius of
          broadcast, the equipment that is approved etc. If for example you go beyond
          that radius, or use a more powerful transmitter and therefore interfere
          with
          other stations' signals, you breach the law and CCK has to come in. Further,
          in
          this case, RMS was given sufficient time to put in corrective measures.



          This
          court case between RMS and CCK has been going on for a while. Please read:
          http://kenyalaw.org/CaseSearch/view_preview1.php?link=70542457891338696266282



          Just
          to highlight a few things:

          CCK
          issued a public notice on May 17, 2012 where it warned of  "UNAUTHORISED USE
          OF BROADCAST FREQUENCIES"   in the Daily Nation, and
          reminded "the licensed
          frequency users that all radio frequency transmitters must be operated under
          a
          valid licence whose conditions must be adhered to. In accordance with
          the Kenya Information and
          Communications Act, Cap 411A, operation of radio services without a licence
          is an offence that
          attracts a fine of Kshs.5 million and imprisonment for a term not exceeding
          three years or both"



          Those operating illegal licences were given a
          30 day notice to surrender the frequencies, failure to which CCK warned that
          it
          would take action. Several radio stations among them Neutral Digital
          Broadcasters Limited, Trans World Radio – Kenya, Real-Time Solutions
          Limited,
          Imani Radio & TV Ministries, Capital FM and other stations duly complied
          with the direction and informed CCK that they had installed band filters to
          minimise harmful interference.



          CCK wrote to RMS a “Notice of Violation” letter dated 3rd August
          2012, where several non conformities were noted. CCK was concerned
          that that despite having asked RMS to correct the anomalies, no action had
          been taken. CCK further asked RMS to take corrective measures within 30
          days
          from the date of the letter to ensure that it installs "the band pass
          filters, obtain Type Approval for its transmitters, shut down unauthorised
          stations and relocate to the designated broadcast sites". RMS on different
          dates received more letters from CCK on unauthorized use
          frequencies.



          Needless to say, RMS did not comply and instead
          went to court (it enjoined the AG and the Minister of Information) arguing
          that it was entitled to continued use of the frequencies since the body
          envisaged by Article 34 (5) of Kenya's 2010 Constitution for licensing and
          issuing broadcaster’s frequencies was
          yet to be established. Further, RMS argued that the letters and Notice
          issued
          by CCK contravened/violated its fundamental rights and freedoms under
          Articles
          34, 40, 47 and 48 of Kenya's Constitution and requested the court.
          Additionally, RMS wanted (14) (g) A permanent injunction restraining the 2nd
          (Minister) and
          3rd (CCK) respondents
          or any of them from cancelling, stopping, suspending, restricting or in any
          way
          whatsoever interfering with the petitioner’s licences frequencies,
          broadcasting
          spectrums and broadcasting services.



          The
          courts (Justice Majanja) already re-emphasized the regulatory role of CCK
          in
          issuance of licences and frequencies on 18th January 2013.



          This
          is the summary of the ruling.



          Conclusion and disposition

          62.  In summary, I find and hold that the CCK is
          entitled to exercise regulatory authority over broadcasting and other
          electronic media pursuant to the Kenya Information and
          Communications Act until such time as Parliament establishes the
          body contemplated under Article 34(5) of the
          Constitution. Thus prayers (a), (b) and (c) of the amended petition are
          dismissed.

          63.   I find and hold that the letters dated 6th March
          2012, 3rd August 2012, the Notice of Violation dated 3rd August
          2012 and the notice issued in the Daily Nation of 17th May 2012
          are not in contravention of the petitioners rights protected by Articles
          34, 40 and 47 of the Constitution as they
          are in the nature of notices that afford RMS to show cause why regulatory
          action should not be taken against it. As a consequence, I reject prayers
          (d),
          and (e) of the amended petition.

          64.  The grant of prayers (f) and (g) of the amended
          petition would have the effect of excluding RMS from statutory regulations.
          As
          I have held, I do not think regulatory action, which entitles the RMS to
          due
          process is a violation of the Constitution nor does such action interfere
          with
          its fundamental rights and freedoms of the petitioner.

          65.   In view of the findings I have made, the
          petition is dismissed. As this is a matter for the enforcement of
          fundamental
          rights and freedoms I decline to make an award for costs.

          66.   I thank counsel who appeared in this matter
          for their detailed submissions.

          DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this
          18th day of January 2013.


             



        -- 
        Grace L.N. Mutung'u (Bomu)
        Kenya
        Skype: gracebomu
        Twitter: @Bomu
        Website: http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/profile/GraceMutungu

        _______________________________________________
        kictanet mailing list
        kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
        https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet


        Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/george%40afrinic.net


        The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

        KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.





      _______________________________________________
      kictanet mailing list
      kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
      https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet


      Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/roykoikai%40gmail.com


      The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

      KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.




    -- 
    "Change is slow and gradual. It requires hardwork, a bit of
    luck, a fair amount of self-sacrifice and a lot of patience."

    Roy. 

    _______________________________________________
    kictanet mailing list
    kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
    https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

    Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/odhiambo%40gmail.com

    The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

    KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.




  -- 
  Best regards,
  Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
  Nairobi,KE
  +254733744121/+254722743223
  _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
  I can't hear you -- I'm using the scrambler.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  kictanet mailing list
  kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
  https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet

  Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/godera%40skyweb.co.ke

  The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.

  KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20130204/193dac24/attachment.htm>


More information about the KICTANet mailing list