[kictanet] 3 Media houses protest Majanja's Digital Migration Ruling
S.M. Muraya
murigi.muraya at gmail.com
Sun Dec 29 01:03:00 EAT 2013
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Mutua, Muthusi <Mutua at cck.go.ke> wrote:
> There are particular tenders, even in Kenya, that are subject to
> demonstration of a certain percentage of local participation. This cannot,
> however, be used across the board even for services that don't require this
> kind of treatment.
>
Not sure when and by whom was it decided, certain critical services in
Kenya do not have to involve Kenyan firms.
Do we develop local capacity through procurement laws which ensure foreign
firms manage our critical local/distribution infrastructure?
Note Euro vs China Policy:
http://www.slideshare.net/IPRChina/technology-transfer-to-china-guidance-for-business-4312244
Does Kenyan procurement/policy require foreign firms to engage in joint
(technical) ventures with firms majority owned by Kenyans?
Suspect... Mobitelea was a case of politically "correct" ghosts getting a
5% cut in a Telco. Was it a Kenyan firm with even a small track record of
telco/service provision in Kenya, with evidence it was committed to
developing local talent and capabilities?
As we argue through, what's the definition of local media? Is it one local
> player, two or three of them separately or together? Must these entities
> also be separately 100% Kenyan in equity? Is KBC a local media?
>
> The media/content which enters the Kenyan home/office may originate from
MARS, but the "last mile" infrastructure/frequency through which the
digital content enters the home/office, is licensed/managed in Kenya.
In the finance sector is shareholding by any one individual or entity not
limited to 24.99%. Kenyans should own over 50% of the firms managing signal
distribution.
Let's also appreciate that unless anyone has been denied the chance to
> participate in a tender, a loss of the bid doesn't amount to being barred
> from the process.
>
If being required to have prior engagements in multiple million dollar
contracts is not being barred from the tendering process, then you are
correct.
> As it is, Tanzania has already gone digital. Does anyone know the
> ownership of their signal distributor? Its interesting to know that. US
> examples are ok but we need to put them into context. Local and regional
> examples may even be more relevant to our situation.
>
>
> *From*: Ngigi Waithaka [mailto:ngigi at at.co.ke]
> *Sent*: Saturday, December 28, 2013 09:01 AM
> *To*: Watila Alex <awatila at yahoo.co.uk>
> *Cc*: Consumer and Public Affairs; KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>
> *Subject*: Re: [kictanet] 3 Media houses protest Majanja's Digital
> Migration Ruling
>
> Doing some unrelated research and came across this story here
> http://www.jeffhead.com/usn21/p8.htm
>
> Key point
> "...*However, BAE withdrew from the competition in October 2002,
> recognizing the political reality that its failure to locate and team with
> a US-based production partner made the bid unrealistic. *
>
> *..." *
> Relevance, for those advocating that national interest does not matter in
> *critical procurement* and backing for local firms, even a large
> conglomerate as BAE with all the backing from Downling Street can't win a
> large defense contract in the US against US firms.
>
> Another interesting read here
>
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/beltway/2011/02/28/how-boeing-won-the-tanker-war/
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Watila Alex <awatila at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> finally accessed the task force report at www.cck.go.ke/about/downloads/
>> *migration*_*digital*_tv.pdf
>>
>>
>> the report made the flowing observations & recommendations on the digital
>> signal distribution
>>
>>
>> - The signal distributors will provide services to broadcasters on an
>> equitable, reasonable, non-preferential and non-discriminatory basis.
>> - *note the distinction between broadcaster &** signal distributor*. *i
>> was unable to find any obligation placed on broadcasters to avail their
>> content to all the signal distributors. the three broadcasters could decide
>> to only provide their content to their signal distribution company. *
>> - The functions of a signal distributor were previously carried out
>> by the broadcasters and a number of challenges come into focus since the
>> existing broadcasters have already made significant investments in
>> infrastructure. There has to be a mechanism to ensure that this investment
>> is not wasted.- *this has been the argument of the three
>> broadcasters.*
>> - The high set-up costs will limit the number of signal distributors.
>> Furthermore, signal distribution services may not penetrate to areas that
>> are not commercially viable. - *limitation of signal distributors
>> seems to have been based on cost of set-up and not the spectrum. according
>> to the three broadcasters, they are able to upgrade their infrastructure to
>> distribute digital signals at a cost that is affordable to them*
>> - In order to reduce the cost of migration, the existing designated
>> transmitting analogue sites and infrastructure will be used for digital
>> transmission. - *this has been the argument of the three
>> broadcasters.*
>> - Based on the government decision to licence KBC as a signal
>> distributor, KBC shall form an independent company to run the signal
>> distribution services in order to avoid conflict of interests or cross
>> subsidies. - *Signet? shouldn't it have been a locally owned company.
>> not sure how Chinese ownership came in*
>> - The current broadcasters will be allowed to form an independent
>> company to run the signal distribution services in order to utilize their
>> existing infrastructure. This company should be independent to avoid
>> conflict of interests or cross subsidies. This company will be given the
>> first preference to a signal distribution licence. * this seems not
>> to have happened as recommended. would have prevented the current acrimony*
>> - Existing broadcasters who own infrastructure will negotiate
>> commercial terms with the licensed signal distribution provider for
>> transfer of ownership of the infrastructure.* the three broadcasters
>> seem unwilling to pursue this as a means of recovering their "40 billion
>> kes" investment *
>> - A time limit be set after which broadcasters will not be allowed to
>> operate unlicensed signal distribution services - *seems the three
>> broadcasters have a grace period to distribute digitally*.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/27/2013 11:18 AM, Watila Alex wrote:
>>
>> does anyone have a copy of the digital migration task force report
>> that the media houses are referring to in today's appeal?
>>
>> --
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android<http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *Watila Alex <awatila at yahoo.co.uk> <awatila at yahoo.co.uk>;
>> *To: *Wambua, Christopher <Wambua at cck.go.ke> <Wambua at cck.go.ke>;
>> *Cc: *Consumer and Public Affairs <CPA at cck.go.ke> <CPA at cck.go.ke>;
>> KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke><kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>;
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [kictanet] 3 Media houses protest Majanja's Digital
>> Migration Ruling
>> *Sent: *Thu, Dec 26, 2013 6:59:06 PM
>>
>>
>> why was the number of signal distributors limited to two?
>> --
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android<http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: *Wambua, Christopher <Wambua at cck.go.ke> <Wambua at cck.go.ke>;
>> *To: *<awatila at yahoo.co.uk> <awatila at yahoo.co.uk>;
>> *Cc: *Consumer and Public Affairs <CPA at cck.go.ke> <CPA at cck.go.ke>;
>> KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions <kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke><kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke>;
>>
>> *Subject: *Re: [kictanet] 3 Media houses protest Majanja's Digital
>> Migration Ruling
>> *Sent: *Thu, Dec 26, 2013 6:43:55 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kictanet mailing list
>> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>>
>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ngigi%40at.co.ke
>>
>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>
>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
>> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Regards,*
>
> *Wait**haka Ngigi*
> Chief Executive Officer | Alliance Technologies | MCK Nairobi Synod
> Building
> T + 254 (0) 20 2333 471 |Office Mobile: +254 786 28 28 28 | M + 254 737
> 811 000
> www.at.co.ke
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
>
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/murigi.muraya%40gmail.com
>
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20131229/699a177b/attachment.htm>
More information about the KICTANet
mailing list