[kictanet] Kenya opposes internet rules review

[Ali Hussein]

Alice

Yes. Important that we do that. 

It's telling that no major Kenyan media house has run any substantial story on something that has been so emotive worldwide and in the Internet space. Is it that it's too technical an area and it requires a specific skill set that may be lacking? 

I'm looking forward to some sort of rejoinder from the journalists on this list.

Ali Hussein

+254 773/713 601113

Sent from my iPhone®

On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:58 AM, alice at apc.org wrote:

> They are not internet rules. Rather International Telecommunications Regulations (ITRs)
> 
> Ali, I agree there is a disconnect and perhaps a lack of understanding of what the ITRs are. 
> 
> Educate the media?
> 
> Best
> Alice
> ----------
> 
> Http://www.biztechafrica.com/article/
> 
> Kenya opposes internet rules review
> 
> By Semaj Itosno, Nairobi. 
> 
> Kenya will not support a review of the Internet’s governing rules and economic model, which were originally agreed onin Melbourne 25 yearsago.On Tuesday next week, 193 telecommunication regulatory bodies willconverge on Dubai to review  the regulations.The review of the regulations and economic model has split the membercountries into two. One group supports the change of the law, which ifadopted will see content providers pay for the service.  The otherwants the status quo to remain.Communications Commission of Kenya (CCK) and senior officials at theMinistry of Information will represent the country at the meeting,where they will oppose the review.Information Permanent Secretary Bitange Ndemo, said today that Kenyais not supporting the review, because it will stifle innovation andmake internet access more expensive.“ITU should stick with regulating telecoms industry and leave out theinternet, as expanding its mandate to start regulating it will stifleinnovation, especially in the Third World countries which are thebeneficiaries of such content,” said Dr Ndemo. “Our constitutionguarantees freedom of information through the Bill of Rights whichwould also be threatened if the proposal is adopted.”Those supporting the review such as the European TelecommunicationsNetwork Operators’ Association  (ETNO) which drives broadband growthin Europe have based their argument on Article 3 of the Melbournetreaty which says:“Operating Agencies shall endeavour to provide sufficienttelecommunications facilities to meet requirements of, and demand for,international telecommunication services. For this purpose,  and toensure an adequate return on investment in high bandwidthinfrastructures, operating agencies shall negotiate commercialagreements to achieve a sustainable system of fair compensation fortelecommunications services and, where appropriate, respecting theprinciple of sending party network pays.”In the current arrangement it is the receiver who pays for the contentand the delivery, and network quality is not guaranteed.Sally WentworthInternet Society+1 703 439 2146wentworth at isoc.orgwww.isoc.org
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> 
> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/info%40alyhussein.com
> 
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
> 
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.