[kictanet] Australia backs UN telco treaty changes

[Chip Sharp]

Fwiw, 
In the CWG- WCIT meetings I've attended, the interventions by Australia have been reasonable.  I've not seen (m)any written contributions from au.
Chip

On Jun 9, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Alice Munyua <alice at apc.org> wrote:

> Yes it is not clear from the article what the Australians are supporting.
> It's a pity this process WCIT and the ITR's seem to be attracting so much propaganda rather than balanced discussions on the various provisions and the reviews being proposed.
> 
> Best
> Alice
> 
> 
> On 09/06/2012 22:36, McTim wrote:
>> Too bad it doesn't say what the Ozzies are supporting, there are
>> literally hundreds of different provisions of the ITRs!!
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet
> 
> Unsubscribe or change your options at https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/chsharp%40cisco.com
> 
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
> 
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors online that you follow in real life: respect people's times and bandwidth, share knowledge, don't flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.