[kictanet] International remittances straight to your M-PESA account

[Francis Hook]

Washington, I think what is meant stems from the "regular" WU system
where the receiver pays nothing (and the sender does) ...would this
new model depart from that?  If not, how does this affect the WU way
of doing business in terms of the agents who pay out on its behalf?
Do they now have to reconcile in so many more ways (rcv money, pay the
WU agent, pay the mobile money hub, etc).

On 31/03/2011, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 18:10, Erik Hersman <erik at zungu.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know what the transaction cost is for people who receive money
>> locally?
>>
>>    Erik Hersman
>>
>>
> Erik,
>
> I think it should be obvious. The sender incurs the cost of sending and the
> receiver incurs the cost of withdrawal, as published by Safaricom already. I
> don't want to be told I am wrong, because then it does not make much sense,
> no?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
> Nairobi,KE
> +254733744121/+254722743223
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Damn!!
>


-- 
Francis Hook
+254 733 504561