[kictanet] what really merits discussion on KICTANET

[Francis Hook]

Hi All,
With all due respect to various subscribers of data/voice and other services
who have genuine grievances against various operators and their services, I
feel compelled to ask what the scope of discussions is on KICTANET?   And
could those discussions be within an actionable framework e.g. what does the
comms act say abt poor QoS, what are the metrics for measuring network
quality, etc.

Otherwise as it stands, its no more different than the "Watchman" column in
the Daily Nation.   And to a certain extent I suspect its being used as an
online focus group - to test waters and gauge opinions.  In other instances
some subliminal (individual or corporate) marketing creeps in.

Can the moderators please stand up and offer clarity on what really merits
discussion?

-- 
Francis Hook
+254 733 504561
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20110307/5b8816f8/attachment.htm>