[kictanet] DAY 10: The Name "The Independent Communications Commission of Kenya"

[k.k. ombati]

hi listers,
i would like to respond to 2issues: the first one being that the ICCK
is not among the commissions listed in article 248 of the constitution
and the second one that article 34(1)&(5) of the constitution only
contemplates one body to regulate the media i.e media council
1:on a careful reading of article 248(1) it states that '...this
chapter applies to the commissions specified in clause (2)'..it does
not say that those are the only constitutionally mandated commissions
2:article34(5) refers to a the establishment of a body that sets media
standards and we are all agreed that it is the media council.
the role of the ICCK is to facilitate development of the
telecoms,broadcasting sector so the functions of the 2 bodies are
distinct and there is no contravention of s34(5) because the ONE BODY
that it contemplates to regulate media standards is the MCK but this
does not in way bar the establishment of the ICCK

On 2/25/11, Grace Githaiga <ggithaiga at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Muriuki
>
> I think Wamuyu had raised the concern of which body (ICCK or the Media
> Council) is envisaged in article 34 (5) of the Constitution.
>
> Having read the article, and having consulted with the a media lawyer Henry
> Maina, the Director of Article 19, that envisaged body is the Media Council
> which will in 5 (c) set media standards and regulate and monitor compliance
> with those standards.
>
> This being the last day of this debate, and in which I believe we can make
> any comments on any of the sections discussed, I  will reiterate that
> article 2 of the ICCK 2010 (Object of the Act) be deleted as it belongs to
> the Media Council.
>
> Rgds
> GG
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you have the strength to survive, you have the power to succeed. Life is
> all about choices we make depending upon the situation we are in. Go forth
> and rule the World!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke
> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 08:03:36 +0300
> Subject: Re: [kictanet] DAY 10: The Name "The Independent Communications
> Commission of Kenya"
> CC: kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> To: ggithaiga at hotmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Indeed Catherine , the same issue was raised by Wamuyu Gatheru
> I not a lawyer – but  the constitution  is supreme
>
>
>
> cheers
>
> Muriuki Mureithi
>
> The happiest of people don't necessarily
> HAVE the best of everything;
> They just MAKE the best of everything
>
>
>
> From: kictanet-bounces+mureithi=summitstrategies.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> [mailto:kictanet-bounces+mureithi=summitstrategies.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke]
> On Behalf Of Catherine Adeya
> Sent: 25 February 2011 07:32
> To: mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke
> Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
> Subject: [kictanet] DAY 10: The Name "The Independent Communications
> Commission of Kenya"
>
>
>
> Dear Listers,
>
> Today is the final day on the discussions on the Independent Communications
> Commission of Kenya Bill 2010.  I think it would be worthwhile to revisit a
> concern Mr Wangusi raised on the first day. He was concerned that in the new
> Constitution -- specifically  in Chapter 15, Clause 248 (1&2) which
> establishes Commissions in this country -- the ICCK name does not appear to
> be among those listed. So is this title in contravention of the Constitution
> and should we suggest another name like “Communications Regulatory Authority
> of Kenya” or something like that.
>
> We would appreciate your thoughts.
>
> Best Wishes,
>
> Nyaki
>
> _______________________________________________ kictanet mailing list
> kictanet at lists.kictanet.or.ke
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/listinfo/kictanet This message was sent
> to: ggithaiga at hotmail.com Unsubscribe or change your options at
> http://lists.kictanet.or.ke/mailman/options/kictanet/ggithaiga%40hotmail.com
>