[kictanet] DAY 10: The Name "The Independent Communications Commission of Kenya"

[muriuki mureithi]

Indeed Catherine , the same issue was raised by Wamuyu Gatheru 

I not a lawyer – but  the constitution  is supreme

 

 

cheers 

 

Muriuki Mureithi 

 

The happiest of people don't necessarily 
HAVE the best of everything; 
They just MAKE the best of everything

 

From: kictanet-bounces+mureithi=summitstrategies.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke [mailto:kictanet-bounces+mureithi=summitstrategies.co.ke at lists.kictanet.or.ke] On Behalf Of Catherine Adeya
Sent: 25 February 2011 07:32
To: mureithi at summitstrategies.co.ke
Cc: KICTAnet ICT Policy Discussions
Subject: [kictanet] DAY 10: The Name "The Independent Communications Commission of Kenya"

 

Dear Listers,

 

Today is the final day on the discussions on the Independent Communications Commission of Kenya Bill 2010.  I think it would be worthwhile to revisit a concern Mr Wangusi raised on the first day. He was concerned that in the new Constitution -- specifically  in Chapter 15, Clause 248 (1&2) which establishes Commissions in this country -- the ICCK name does not appear to be among those listed. So is this title in contravention of the Constitution and should we suggest another name like “Communications Regulatory Authority of Kenya” or something like that. 

 

We would appreciate your thoughts.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Nyaki

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.kictanet.or.ke/pipermail/kictanet/attachments/20110225/2037b380/attachment.htm>